高健 wrote:
Please let me dig it a little more:
I think that when a session is accessing a postgersql table. It will be
influenced by the
followings:
Really old data (needed to be vacuumed, eg: old image at one day ago).
Recent data (committed and uncommitted), because they are
I'll try to answer the questions I can.
Pawel Veselov wrote:
I've been struggling with understanding all the necessary pieces for
streaming replication. So I put
down the pieces as I did understand them, and would appreciate if you guys
could point out any of the
stuff I understood or have
Hello,
Is anyone running PostgreSQL on a clustered file system on Linux? By
clustered I actually mean shared, such that the same storage is
mounted by different servers at the same time (of course, only one
instance of PostgreSQL on only one server can be running on such a
setup, and there are a
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Guillaume Lelarge guilla...@lelarge.infowrote:
You divide an integer with an integer, that should give you an integer.
Can you tell me the reasoning behind that idea?
Is it a rule that the output type of an operator must equal the input type?
In this case that
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Willy-Bas Loos willy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Guillaume Lelarge guilla...@lelarge.info
wrote:
You divide an integer with an integer, that should give you an integer.
Can you tell me the reasoning behind that idea?
Is it a rule
Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
It'd be really interesting to enhance the query planner to be smarter
about this particular case,
At least for this particular example, it's not at all clear to me that
it'd be worth the cost. Getting rid of accesses to tables altogether is
Hey everyone,
We recently got bit by this, and I wanted to make sure it was known to
the general community.
In new(er) Linux kernels, including late versions of the 2.6 tree, XFS
has introduced dynamic speculative preallocation. What does this do? It
was added to prevent filesystem
On Nov 12, 2012, at 7:37 AM, Shaun Thomas wrote:
Hey everyone,
We recently got bit by this, and I wanted to make sure it was known to the
general community.
In new(er) Linux kernels, including late versions of the 2.6 tree, XFS has
introduced dynamic speculative preallocation. What
Hello all,
I read this thread with interest but I still have some questions
about cascading replication as you describe it.
Le 12/11/2012 10:36, Albe Laurenz a écrit :
I'll try to answer the questions I can.
3. Recovery. That part is a bit confusing. The majority of the documentation
says
Hello Ivan,
this sounds so mainframe-ish, i recall, in IBM MVS (circa 1990+) we used to
attach two systems to
the same DASDie storage, and then employ disk serialization provided by the
OS to achieve some
integrity to the data. (do not get me wrong i had adequate Unix/SUNOS/Ultrix
experience
I have strange problem. I am trying to achieve streaming replication
between 2 PostgreSQL servers with version 9.2.1. The replications worked
just fine then the servers was without load. The problem is that now then
the servers are loaded I cannot start the replication without receiving
this
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Albe Laurenz laurenz.a...@wien.gv.atwrote:
I'll try to answer the questions I can.
Thank you!
Pawel Veselov wrote:
I've been struggling with understanding all the necessary pieces for
streaming replication. So I put
down the pieces as I did understand
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Pawel Veselov pawel.vese...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Albe Laurenz laurenz.a...@wien.gv.atwrote:
I'll try to answer the questions I can.
Thank you!
Pawel Veselov wrote:
I've been struggling with understanding all the necessary
On 11/10/2012 02:21 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Lists li...@benjamindsmith.com wrote:
...
3) For each of the tables from #2, run the commands
REINDEX TABLE $table;
VACUUM FULL ANALYZE $table;
The end result is a squeaky-clean database server with expected disk
The good news is that we have now resolved our critical problem (disk
space overuse) with a somewhat hackish, slow answer that is nonetheless
good enough for now.
Now I'd like to work out how to get autovacuum to work smoothly within
our cluster. I'm happy to try to clarify my notes and post
Came across this problem when trying to assign to a variable a field from a
record that could come from multiple cursors. PG throws an error -
ERROR: type of parameter 7 (bigint) does not match that when preparing the
plan (unknown). If I make the null column in c1 null::bigint to match cursor
From: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of David Greco
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 3:35 PM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: [GENERAL] plpgsql cursor reuse
Came across this problem when trying to assign to a variable a field
Am 12.11.2012 11:03, schrieb Ivan Voras:
Hello,
Is anyone running PostgreSQL on a clustered file system on Linux? By
clustered I actually mean shared, such that the same storage is
mounted by different servers at the same time (of course, only one
instance of PostgreSQL on only one server can
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Lists li...@benjamindsmith.com wrote:
On 11/10/2012 02:21 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Lists li...@benjamindsmith.com wrote:
2) It was sheer chance that I discovered the need to reindex prior to
vacuum
in order to get the disk
Hello David,
Well, I think this is normal you can t assign null to a variable without a
proper cating in your example you can do somthing like this
c1 cursor FOR SELECT 1 as shipmentid, null::bigint as olmid;
Regards
From: David Greco
On 11/12/2012 1:52 PM, Gunnar Nick Bluth wrote:
Am 12.11.2012 11:03, schrieb Ivan Voras:
Is anyone running PostgreSQL on a clustered file system on Linux? By
clustered I actually mean shared, such that the same storage is
mounted by different servers at the same time (of course, only one
On 11/12/2012 01:31 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Lists li...@benjamindsmith.com wrote:
On 11/10/2012 02:21 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Lists li...@benjamindsmith.com wrote:
2) It was sheer chance that I discovered the need to reindex prior
Lists wrote:
There's a wealth of how to tune PG instruction that's old and
(based on this thread alone) often stale enough to be classified
as disinformative. For example, nearest I can tell, the entirety of
this page is just wrong and/or irrelevant for 9.x and up:
Ivan,
* Ivan Voras (ivo...@freebsd.org) wrote:
Is anyone running PostgreSQL on a clustered file system on Linux? By
clustered I actually mean shared, such that the same storage is
mounted by different servers at the same time (of course, only one
instance of PostgreSQL on only one server can
Kevin --
You wrote:
...
running transactions can cause autovacuum processes to stall
out or be autocancelled. Long running transactions - is now
long? In our system it's rare to have a transaction (even a
prepared transaction) last much longer than a few minutes. Is that
enough time to cause
Hi,
That is what I got from gdb:
TopMemoryContext: 88992 total in 10 blocks; 10336 free (7 chunks); 78656
used
Type information cache: 24576 total in 2 blocks; 11888 free (5 chunks);
12688 used
Operator lookup cache: 24576 total in 2 blocks; 11888 free (5 chunks);
12688 used
Operator class
On 11/13/2012 04:04 AM, Lists wrote:
There's a wealth of how to tune PG instruction that's old and (based
on this thread alone) often stale enough to be classified as
disinformative. For example, nearest I can tell, the entirety of this
page is just wrong and/or irrelevant for 9.x and up:
On 11/13/2012 10:29 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
On 11/13/2012 04:04 AM, Lists wrote:
There's a wealth of how to tune PG instruction that's old and (based
on this thread alone) often stale enough to be classified as
disinformative. For example, nearest I can tell, the entirety of this
page is
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 02:16:21PM +0100, Willy-Bas Loos wrote:
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
guilla...@lelarge.infowrote:
You divide an integer with an integer, that should give you an integer.
Can you tell me the reasoning behind that idea?
Is it a rule that the
29 matches
Mail list logo
