Hello
2013/6/11 Panneerselvam Posangu panneer...@hotmail.com:
Hi,
I have some Oracle Packages and some standalone procedure in Oracle schema.
As we are converting our application as PostgreSQL compliant we are looking
at these Oracle objects. These packages have no variables declared and
Perhaps someone with a spare server floating around could install Ubuntu
LTS and run some pg-bench benchmarks with the various kernel options?
Like you, I'd have to stick to official updates for production systems.
-Toby
On 07/06/13 15:36, Nikhil G Daddikar wrote:
Folks,
This is bad news as
Hello!
In a PostgreSQL 8.4.13 why doesn't this please
deliver a floating value (a quotient between 0 and 1):
select
id,
count(nullif(nice, false)) - count(nullif(nice, true)) /
count(nice) as rating
from pref_rep where nice is not null
group by id
;
id
Because you're calculating a - (b/c) instead of (a-b)/c
On 11 June 2013 11:51, Alexander Farber alexander.far...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
In a PostgreSQL 8.4.13 why doesn't this please
deliver a floating value (a quotient between 0 and 1):
select
id,
count(nullif(nice,
Hello,
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Alban Hertroys haram...@gmail.com wrote:
Because you're calculating a - (b/c) instead of (a-b)/c
On 11 June 2013 11:51, Alexander Farber alexander.far...@gmail.com wrote:
Alexander Farber wrote:
In a PostgreSQL 8.4.13 why doesn't this please
deliver a floating value (a quotient between 0 and 1):
select
id,
count(nullif(nice, false)) - count(nullif(nice, true)) /
count(nice) as rating
from pref_rep where nice is not null
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Philipp Kraus
philipp.kr...@flashpixx.de wrote:
Hello,
I'm creating a database and I have got a table with a version field.
Not sure, but if the version field is something like the version row
indicator used by some frameworks (e.g., Hibernate), then you are
Whoops, forgot to keep it on the list.
On 06/11/2013 11:51 AM, Alexander Farber wrote:
Hello!
In a PostgreSQL 8.4.13 why doesn't this please
deliver a floating value (a quotient between 0 and 1):
You should upgrade to 8.4.17.
select
id,
count(nullif(nice, false)) -
On 2013-06-11 00:42:59 +0200, John R Pierce said:
On 6/10/2013 12:52 AM, Philipp Kraus wrote:
I'm creating a database and I have got a table with a version field.
Can I update on structure changes (DDL) like create / update table
increment this field automatically?
I would like to create a
Hi,
(2013/05/09 1:39), Joshua Berry wrote:
| I'm using PG 9.1.9 with a client application using various versions of
the
| pgsqlODBC driver on Windows. Cursors are used heavily, as well as some
pretty
| heavy trigger queries on db writes which update several materialized
views.
|
| The server
Hiroshi Inoue in...@tpf.co.jp writes:
It's also better to fix the crash at backend side.
Yeah, definitely. Do we have a self-contained test case for this?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
Aleksandr Furmanov wrote
Thanks,
However I am not just replicating data from 'a' to 'b', I provided
simplified example, in reality table 'b' keeps data which are going to be
merged into 'a', some rows will be updated, some added. There is some
other work has to be done on 'b' before merging
# select tsrange(null)::tstzrange;
ERROR: cannot cast type tsrange to tstzrange
LINE 1: select tsrange(null)::tstzrange;
Is this expected?
select null::timestamp::timestamptz;
works fine.
Hi all,
I am a member of the Charlotte Linux User Group and did a presentation on
PostgreSQL at the SouthEast LinuxFest this past weekend. Our LUG table was
right next to the PostgreSQL table this year, and I am guessing some of you
will find the presentation of some interest. My discussion
Am I doing something silly? Or is the row-estimation for gist indexes not
even close in this case?
https://gist.github.com/joevandyk/503cc3d836ee5d101224/raw/c6fc53b2da06849d3d04effbd1c147fc36124245/gistfile1.txtor
code below:
-- This is not running inside a transaction.
drop table if exists f;
Joe Van Dyk j...@tanga.com writes:
Am I doing something silly? Or is the row-estimation for gist indexes not
even close in this case?
9.2 didn't have any logic for estimating range conditions. I see
reasonable estimates for this case in HEAD, though, presumably thanks
to work by Alexander
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Joe Van Dyk j...@tanga.com writes:
Am I doing something silly? Or is the row-estimation for gist indexes not
even close in this case?
9.2 didn't have any logic for estimating range conditions. I see
reasonable estimates
(2013/06/12 0:03), Tom Lane wrote:
Hiroshi Inoue in...@tpf.co.jp writes:
It's also better to fix the crash at backend side.
Yeah, definitely. Do we have a self-contained test case for this?
Unfortunately no. I'm testing with a modified psqlodbc driver.
The simplest way may be as follows.
18 matches
Mail list logo
