On 11/06/2015 05:24 PM, Michael Convey wrote:
Below is from my OpenSUSE command line. I only installed the first
package, but both say, "Installed: Yes". Why is this? Are they really
the same package?
linux-srqm:~ # zypper info postgresql
Loading repository data...
Reading installed
Below is from my OpenSUSE command line. I only installed the first package,
but both say, "Installed: Yes". Why is this? Are they really the same
package?
linux-srqm:~ # zypper info postgresql
Loading repository data...
Reading installed packages...
Information for package postgresql:
On 11/06/2015 09:13 AM, Bertrand Roos wrote:
Le 04/11/2015 16:57, Adrian Klaver a écrit :
On 11/04/2015 07:43 AM, Bertrand Roos wrote:
Le 04/11/2015 14:55, Bill Moran a écrit :
On Wed, 4 Nov 2015 14:32:37 +0100
Bertrand Roos wrote:
I try to configure auto-analyse
Hi,
I have simplified the case and tried to look from a list of json items
(please see test table content). I think I have managed to unpack values in
such a way that also partial matching is possible. However, the end result
has two "value" named columns even if I have tried to rename them.
How
Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> Something among those lines?
>>
>>> +
>>> + WAL file segments and WAL file segments with .partial
>>> + are deleted, while timeline history files and backup history files are
>>> not.
>>> +
>>
>> "WAL file segments with .partial" sounds strange.
>> What about
On 11/5/2015 11:25 PM, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
But having an "alter table drop primary key" would indeed be nice.
is that syntax in the sql standard? or is it just an oraclism? do any
other major sql's have an equivalent ?
--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
--
Sent via
>
> Presumably it doesn't happen without the use of the pipe notation.
>
Indeed, it only happens when a pipe is involved.
>
> I suspect that what's happening is that stdout isn't getting put into
> binary mode, so that Microsoft's CR/NL translation corrupts the data.
> If that's true, though,
Purely out of curiosity, is there any way of using some sort of "web of
trust" (comparable with GPG or whatever) when verifying server and
client certificates, rather than going back to a centralised CA?
My apologies if this is a silly question, or if there are fundamental
reasons why such a
John R Pierce writes:
> On 11/5/2015 11:25 PM, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
>> But having an "alter table drop primary key" would indeed be nice.
> is that syntax in the sql standard? or is it just an oraclism?
AFAICS there is no such syntax in SQL:2011 --- it only offers
Le 04/11/2015 16:57, Adrian Klaver a écrit :
On 11/04/2015 07:43 AM, Bertrand Roos wrote:
Le 04/11/2015 14:55, Bill Moran a écrit :
On Wed, 4 Nov 2015 14:32:37 +0100
Bertrand Roos wrote:
I try to configure auto-analyse task with postgresql 9.4.
I have the
10 matches
Mail list logo