We have a PgAdmin PLPgSQL debugger issue.
We are running it on the same server with the database and there is not much
else besides Postgres running on that server. Windows server 2012 OS.
We have tried running it as the admin role and a superuser role - neither one
fixes the issue.
While it is
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 7:22 AM, 莎士比亚说: <657985...@qq.com> wrote:
>> Hi moran and others;
>>
>> yesterday i get the pg problem again, and i use perf top Observation
>> follows:
>> PerfTop: 11574 irqs/sec kernel:
Ok . thanks .. this is our first foray into postgresql and we were comparing
retrieve times based on the 'normal' Microsoft SQL environment to ensure that
we were at least functioning properly.
Long term, our goal is to restructure that table into a star-schema/mdm type
format to ease the
I found this link explaining how to launch multiple instances. I was not
able to find detailed steps like these in the postgres docs.
Is this accurate from what you perceive? It also says to have separate
init.d scripts (startup). Thanks
On 11/5/15 12:14 AM, Jiří Hlinka wrote:
I'm doing simple UPDATES, INSERTs and DELETEs on this table, but
frequency of these DMLs is _very_ high (it is a queue table used for a
one-way selective [just part of data are replicated] replication of
queries between two instances of the database, lets
On 11/10/2015 07:39 AM, Mammarelli, Joanne T wrote:
Hi – same rookie user as before.
We have one table
100,000 rows
80 columns
When we try to retrieve the data (select * from table) using pgadmin, we
get a 193456 ms retrieve time.
Where is the client(pgAdmin) relative to the server?
Where
On 11/10/2015 08:20 AM, Mammarelli, Joanne T wrote:
Ok . thanks .. this is our first foray into postgresql and we were comparing
retrieve times based on the 'normal' Microsoft SQL environment to ensure that
we were at least functioning properly.
So what are 'normal times' and where and in
On 11/10/15 8:34 AM, tbro wrote:
What I've read about PostgreSQL is that it's a single-thread disk I/O system
where only one read/write operation executes at a time.
Definitely false. However...
Other databases support asynchronous IO, where the database tries to
issue IO requests before
Pgadmin is on the same server
316ms for a 'query analyze select * from table' when run from the command line
(same directory psql is in)
The biggest concern is that we are hoping to hook up an external BI tool (such
as QlikView, for example) and even with QlikView (through an odbc connector)
I would also like to add that I am very suspicious of a table with 80 columns.
Offhand, it sounds like poor database design where someone was trying
to put all the eggs in one basket (figuratively).
Further, what was the exact query?
Queries of the form SELECT * will always be inherently slow
Hello - I am new to this forum and know nothing about PostgreSQL. I have
managed Microsoft SQL for 15 years (I know )
We have a third party application that uses PostgreSQL for the database
engine. Performance writing to our Dell Compellent SAN is lacking.
What I've read about PostgreSQL is
On 11/10/2015 06:34 AM, tbro wrote:
Hello - I am new to this forum and know nothing about PostgreSQL. I have
managed Microsoft SQL for 15 years (I know )
We have a third party application that uses PostgreSQL for the database
engine. Performance writing to our Dell Compellent SAN is
Are there any options for linking a Microsoft sql database to a postgresql
database?
(I want the postgresql database to be the "puller")
-Original Message-
From: Jim Nasby [mailto:jim.na...@bluetreble.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 10:21 AM
To: Mammarelli, Joanne T;
On 11/10/15 9:39 AM, Mammarelli, Joanne T wrote:
Hi – same rookie user as before.
We have one table
100,000 rows
80 columns
When we try to retrieve the data (select * from table) using pgadmin, we
get a 193456 ms retrieve time.
When I ran a query analyze in the command prompt, we get a
On 10 November 2015 at 14:34, tbro wrote:
> We have a third party application that uses PostgreSQL for the database
> engine. Performance writing to our Dell Compellent SAN is lacking.
>
> What I've read about PostgreSQL is that it's a single-thread disk I/O
> system
> where
2015-11-10 15:34 GMT+01:00 tbro :
> Hello - I am new to this forum and know nothing about PostgreSQL. I have
> managed Microsoft SQL for 15 years (I know )
>
> We have a third party application that uses PostgreSQL for the database
> engine. Performance writing to our Dell
Postgres 9.4
From: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Bradley, Christie D
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 7:24 AM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: [GENERAL] Debugger locks up
We have a PgAdmin PLPgSQL debugger issue.
We are
On 11/10/2015 07:37 AM, Mammarelli, Joanne T wrote:
Are there any options for linking a Microsoft sql database to a postgresql
database?
(I want the postgresql database to be the "puller")
How did you install Postgres on the Windows machine?
If through the graphical installer from EDB, you
On 11/6/15 8:01 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Purely out of curiosity, is there any way of using some sort of "web of
trust" (comparable with GPG or whatever) when verifying server and
client certificates, rather than going back to a centralised CA?
My apologies if this is a silly question, or
On 11/10/15 7:57 AM, Mammarelli, Joanne T wrote:
Hi – rookie user here.
I’d like to access data on my Microsoft sql database from my postgres
database.
I stumbled upon the tds_fdw extension and it reads as if it it’s *nix only.
Would acquiring tds_fdw.control from one of the repos possibly
On 11/10/15 9:30 AM, Bradley, Christie D wrote:
Postgres 9.4
*From:* pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org] *On Behalf Of *Bradley,
Christie D
*Sent:* Tuesday, November 10, 2015 7:24 AM
*To:* pgsql-general@postgresql.org
*Subject:* [GENERAL] Debugger
Hi - same rookie user as before.
We have one table
100,000 rows
80 columns
When we try to retrieve the data (select * from table) using pgadmin, we get a
193456 ms retrieve time.
When I ran a query analyze in the command prompt, we get a 316ms retrieve time.
.. and finally. When we
On 11/10/2015 08:11 AM, Mammarelli, Joanne T wrote:
Pgadmin is on the same server
316ms for a 'query analyze select * from table' when run from the command line
(same directory psql is in)
I know of no such command 'query analyze..' in Postgres.
So are you using some other tool?
Or are you
Jim Nasby wrote:
On 11/6/15 8:01 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Purely out of curiosity, is there any way of using some sort of "web of
trust" (comparable with GPG or whatever) when verifying server and
client certificates, rather than going back to a centralised CA?
My apologies if this is a
On 11/10/2015 10:21 AM, Mammarelli, Joanne T wrote:
Hi .. we’re on a hunt to locate either pgloader or the tds_fdw extension
to assist us with pulling data FROM a Microsoft sql server (we’re a
windows-based postgres installation).
So are we taking about a one time operation or continuously
Fair question
Let me elaborate. The command was simply to test the speed at which data
can be written to disk.
Postgre comes into play with the monitoring application itself. Information
pertaining to the 5000+ devices being monitored is sent to the monitoring
application and written to the
Thanks - I've been dying trying to find the software (on the windows side) for
part 3 ..
https://www.mssqltips.com/sqlservertip/3663/sql-server-and-postgresql-foreign-data-wrapper-configuration--part-3/
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Klaver [mailto:adrian.kla...@aklaver.com]
Sent:
Yes, the instance already running is live in that users are indirectly
querying/writing to it. I just need to launch a 2nd instance.
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 9:57 PM, Adrian Klaver
wrote:
> On 11/09/2015 06:03 PM, anj patnaik wrote:
>
> CCing list
>
>> I used the
The third party application is locked down and we do not have root access to
the server. We have reached out to them for the version number of
PostgreSQL.
The application server is a virtual machine (RedHat 6) running on VMware
5.5. This is a stand-alone host server running only the third party
On 11/10/2015 10:58 AM, tbro wrote:
The application is called Nable and is owned by Solarwinds
http://www.n-able.com
Is it the application that is using Postgres?
What would really help is some sort of schematic of how data is flowing
through the system and exactly where the hangup is.
Are there any type of 'pgadmin' like interfaces for the linux side?
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Klaver [mailto:adrian.kla...@aklaver.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 2:12 PM
To: Mammarelli, Joanne T; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Best tool to pull from
Continuously syncing .. we have database in mssql. Ideally we'd like to
connect to the mssql databases and pull out the fields/content we required and
populate that in a postgres database.
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Klaver [mailto:adrian.kla...@aklaver.com]
Sent: Tuesday,
On 11/10/2015 10:58 AM, tbro wrote:
The application is called Nable and is owned by Solarwinds
http://www.n-able.com
It is not uncommon for DAS to be much faster than NAS/SAN.
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack
Hi .. we're on a hunt to locate either pgloader or the tds_fdw extension to
assist us with pulling data FROM a Microsoft sql server (we're a windows-based
postgres installation).
Is this the proper way to handle the process?
On 11/10/2015 08:23 AM, tbro wrote:
The third party application is locked down and we do not have root access to
the server. We have reached out to them for the version number of
PostgreSQL.
The application server is a virtual machine (RedHat 6) running on VMware
5.5. This is a
On 11/10/2015 10:42 AM, tbro wrote:
Fair question
Let me elaborate. The command was simply to test the speed at which data
can be written to disk.
Postgre comes into play with the monitoring application itself. Information
pertaining to the 5000+ devices being monitored is sent to the
On 11/10/2015 11:13 AM, Mammarelli, Joanne T wrote:
Are there any type of 'pgadmin' like interfaces for the linux side?
You can use pgAdmin on Windows to look at/manage Postgres servers on any
platform as long as it is reachable. You can also install pgAdmin on
Linux if you desire, but that
On 11/10/2015 10:26 AM, Mammarelli, Joanne T wrote:
Continuously syncing .. we have database in mssql. Ideally we'd like to
connect to the mssql databases and pull out the fields/content we required and
populate that in a postgres database.
When all else fails you can go the ODBC route. I
On 11/10/2015 11:06 AM, Mammarelli, Joanne T wrote:
Thanks - I've been dying trying to find the software (on the windows side) for
part 3 ..
https://www.mssqltips.com/sqlservertip/3663/sql-server-and-postgresql-foreign-data-wrapper-configuration--part-3/
Another option would be to install
On 11/10/2015 07:49 AM, anj patnaik wrote:
Yes, the instance already running is live in that users are indirectly
querying/writing to it. I just need to launch a 2nd instance.
If you are going to stick with the graphical installer I would probably
post a question here:
På tirsdag 10. november 2015 kl. 17:23:15, skrev tbro >:
The third party application is locked down and we do not have root access to
the server. We have reached out to them for the version number of
PostgreSQL.
The application server is a virtual
The application is called Nable and is owned by Solarwinds
http://www.n-able.com
--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.nabble.com/Disk-I-O-Question-tp5873364p5873428.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing
Excellent! I tried the global flag before but I had it in the wrong
place.
Thanks for the quick service, David!
---
Susan E Hurst
Principal Consultant
Email: susan.hu...@brookhurstdata.com
Mobile: 314-486-3261
On 2015-11-10 14:19, David G.
I would like to extract only letters and numbers [0-9a-z] from an input
string. Using regexp_replace in postgres, I get unexpected results.
The pattern matching seems to stop before the end of the string value is
reached. Some of the values that should have been excluded are still
there.
The following postgresql rpm is installed ..
rpm -qil postgresql-server-9.2.13-1.el7_1.x86_64
on redhat 7
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.1 (Maipo)
Currently following the instructions at the following link in attempt to create
the extension:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Susan Hurst wrote:
> What is the trick for removing all instances of unwanted characters and
> spaces?
(g)lobal flag.
SELECT regexp_replace('hello - world n', '[^0-9a-z]+', '', 'g')
;
David J.
On 11/10/2015 12:53 PM, Mammarelli, Joanne T wrote:
The following postgresql rpm is installed ..
rpm -qil postgresql-server-9.2.13-1.el7_1.x86_64
on redhat 7
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.1 (Maipo)
Currently following the instructions at the following link in attempt to
anj patnaik wrote:
> Can anyone advise if there are problems running postgres over NFS mounted
> partitions?
>
> I do need reliability and high speed.
I have got the advice not to use NFS from a number of people who should know,
but there are also knowledgable people who use PostgreSQL with
Xaver Thum wrote:
> is there an option (provided by Postgres) accessing a Postgres DB via the
> standard XA interface ?
>
> I don't mean the usage of JDBC's class PGXADataSource,
> but the usual XA methods xa_open, xa_prepare, xa_commit, ... of the XA
> standard.
I am not sure why there is no
On 10/11/2015 09:34, Xaver Thum wrote:
Hi all,
is there an option (provided by Postgres) accessing a Postgres DB via the
standard XA interface ?
I don't mean the usage of JDBC's class PGXADataSource,
but the usual XA methods xa_open, xa_prepare, xa_commit, ... of the XA standard.
You
Thanks for the feedback. I have setup a second Linux VM (running RHEL 5.11)
and Postgres 9.4. I ran some insertions today from a client running on
Windows. The client does a loop of 30 updates.
I am seeing about 10-20% increase in latency in the case where DB is on NFS
(over TCP) compared to
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 6:26 PM, anj patnaik wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback. I have setup a second Linux VM (running RHEL
> 5.11) and Postgres 9.4. I ran some insertions today from a client running
> on Windows. The client does a loop of 30 updates.
>
> I am seeing about
On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 7:22 AM, 莎士比亚说: <657985...@qq.com> wrote:
> Hi moran and others;
>
> yesterday i get the pg problem again, and i use perf top Observation
> follows:
> PerfTop: 11574 irqs/sec kernel: 2.2% exact: 0.0% [4000Hz cycles],
> (all, 32 CPUs)
> 81.39% postgres
Hi - rookie user here.
I'd like to access data on my Microsoft sql database from my postgres database.
I stumbled upon the tds_fdw extension and it reads as if it it's *nix only.
Would acquiring tds_fdw.control from one of the repos possibly work on a
windows-based postgres installed database?
Hi adrian,
Thanks for your help. I think I know why the performance is not good.
I misunderstand the document. So in my test, there are thinking time and
keying time for each transaction.
When I remove the thinking time and keying time, the performance become
1500 new order txns/mins.
Your
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 4:26 PM, anj patnaik wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback. I have setup a second Linux VM (running RHEL 5.11)
> and Postgres 9.4. I ran some insertions today from a client running on
> Windows. The client does a loop of 30 updates.
>
> I am seeing about
56 matches
Mail list logo