) but it
surely works.
Regards,
Ntinos Katsaros
PS: libpq has nothing to do with the above :-)!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thank you very much for your reply. The thing is that my SRF is written in
C, not plpgsql, but I'll look into RAISE NOTICE anyway.(I think there is
something equevalent in libpq
Thank you very much for your reply. The thing is that my SRF is written in
C, not plpgsql, but I'll look into RAISE NOTICE anyway.(I think there is
something equevalent in libpq)
Thanks again,
Ntinos Katsaros
Kris Jurka writes:
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody
(or other type of)info together with
the result tuples (even if it requiers some hacking i.e. there is no
provision for something like that)? Any ideas?
Regards,
Ntinos Katsaros
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives
where relname=table_name
Ntinos Katsaros
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
query local tables.
I use v7.4.2.
Is this something too obvious to see it :-) ? Is it something with
nonblocking connection establishment? Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance,
Ntinos Katsaros
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze
this and it worked. However, the problem now is that it is slow
(surely slower than using blocking commands).
If the code above is right (?), why is that?
Thanks for your response,
Ntinos Katsaros
Tom Lane writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
if (PQconsumeInput(conn)!=1) elog(ERROR,Error
on its structure. Any pointers?
Thanks,
Ntinos Katsaros
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
in testlibpq.c example in the documentation) but
with no result. Maybe the whole process described above runs in a sigle
transaction block i.e. that of my SRF(?). I'm a little confused here.
Any ideas?
Regards,
Ntinos Katsaros
---(end of broadcast
