On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 11:46 +0200, Andrew Kelly wrote:
Hi folks,
please forgive what feels like a no-brainer even as I ask it, but...
snip
Just wanted to thank everybody who's provided feedback. I'm squared away
now, and very appreciative of all the help.
Andy
Hi folks,
please forgive what feels like a no-brainer even as I ask it, but...
I've read dozens of times in these lists that when one is upgrading from
an older to newer version of PG, the DB being dumped (older version)
should be done so using pg_dump from the newer version. I think I've
Am Dienstag, 9. Oktober 2007 schrieb Andrew Kelly:
Unless my installation is unique in some way of which I'm yet unaware,
Yes, it's a Debian package.
pg_dump seems to be just a handful of lines in a perl script. In fact,
pg_dump, pg_restore and pg_dumpall are all simlinks to the same simple
Andrew Kelly wrote:
I've read dozens of times in these lists that when one is
upgrading from an older to newer version of PG, the DB
being dumped (older version) should be done so using
pg_dump from the newer version.
[...]
Which bit exactly are we supposed to use from the
newer version?
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 13:58 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Am Dienstag, 9. Oktober 2007 schrieb Andrew Kelly:
Unless my installation is unique in some way of which I'm yet unaware,
Yes, it's a Debian package.
Indeed, yes.
Where can I read what that means in the great scheme of things?
Le mardi 09 octobre 2007, Andrew Kelly a écrit :
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 13:58 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Where can I read what that means in the great scheme of things?
Are you saying that Deb is markedly different from other packages (.rpm)
or that any packaged version of PG is different
Andrew Kelly wrote:
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 13:58 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Am Dienstag, 9. Oktober 2007 schrieb Andrew Kelly:
Unless my installation is unique in some way of which I'm yet unaware,
Yes, it's a Debian package.
Indeed, yes.
Where can I read what that means in the great
