Got it. Thank you very much. :)
-Sudalai
-
sudalai
--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.nabble.com/ERROR-missing-chunk-number-0-for-toast-value-while-using-logical-decoder-tp5909194p5912426.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Sent
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 7:08 PM, sudalai wrote:
> thank u.
> why (select * from pg_logical_slot_peek_changes('slot',NULL,1) ) take share
> lock ?
> any idea ?
My guess is that this lock comes from your plugin code. Please double-check it.
--
Michael
--
Sent via
thank u.
why (select * from pg_logical_slot_peek_changes('slot',NULL,1) ) take share
lock ?
any idea ?
-Sudalai
-
sudalai
--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.nabble.com/ERROR-missing-chunk-number-0-for-toast-value-while-using-logical-decoder-tp5909194p5912411.html
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 4:31 PM, sudalai wrote:
> Please help me, I am using PostgreSQL 9.5.0.
> I don't know much in postgres internals. why does peek_changes trying
> to take share lock on 248486 (primary key of one table).
> Its postgres logical decoder
@micheal,
Thanks for your help. It working now.
But, now I'm getting deadlock, when i peek_changes or get_changes, in
live system.
db=#select count(*) from pg_logical_slot_peek_changes('slot',NULL,100);
/* pid : 25833 */
ERROR: deadlock detected
DETAIL: Process 25833 waits for
Thank u.
The problem is because of the commented line. I forgot about that.
Now, I uncommented it. It working fine.
Thank u very much.
-Sudalai
-
sudalai
--
View this message in context:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 4:55 PM, sudalai wrote:
> Thanks for : https://github.com/michaelpq/pg_plugins/tree/master/decoder_raw
> I will upgrade my servers to PostgreSQL 9.5.3, but i want to find the
> problem.
> Please help me.
> I don't have SQL sequence.
> Does anything i
Thanks for : https://github.com/michaelpq/pg_plugins/tree/master/decoder_raw
I will upgrade my servers to PostgreSQL 9.5.3, but i want to find the
problem.
Please help me.
I don't have SQL sequence.
Does anything i can get from server, that will help us to debug the problem?
Here is
Hi john,
PostgreSQL 9.5.0 has bug !!!, Does 9.5.0 remove unconsumed toast rows
need for slot??
It is fixed in latest!!!.
-Sudalai
-
sudalai
--
View this message in context: