Re: [GENERAL] Replication with non-read-only standby.

2016-07-12 Thread Nick Babadzhanian
echal" <marechal.sylva...@gmail.com> To: "Nick Babadzhanian" <n...@cobra.ru> Cc: "pgsql-general" <pgsql-general@postgresql.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2016 11:00:05 PM Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Replication with non-read-only standby. 2016-06-30 15:15 GMT+02:00

Re: [GENERAL] Replication with non-read-only standby.

2016-07-01 Thread Moreno Andreo
Il 01/07/2016 05:21, Venkata Balaji N ha scritto: On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 11:15 PM, Nick Babadzhanian wrote: Setup: 2 PostgreSQL servers are geographically spread. The first one

Re: [GENERAL] Replication with non-read-only standby.

2016-06-30 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 7:15 AM, Nick Babadzhanian wrote: > Setup: > 2 PostgreSQL servers are geographically spread. The first one is used for an > application that gathers data. It is connected to the second database that is > used to process the said data. Connection is not

[GENERAL] Replication with non-read-only standby.

2016-06-30 Thread Nick Babadzhanian
Setup: 2 PostgreSQL servers are geographically spread. The first one is used for an application that gathers data. It is connected to the second database that is used to process the said data. Connection is not very stable nor is it fast, so using Bidirectional replication is not an option. It