Em 06/09/2012 02:34, Chris Travers escreveu:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Edson Richter
edsonrich...@hotmail.com mailto:edsonrich...@hotmail.com wrote:
Em 05/09/2012 23:49, Chris Travers escreveu:
Regarding MySQL vs PostgreSQL:
MySQL is what you get when app
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Ondrej Ivanič ondrej.iva...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On 5 September 2012 12:14, Chris Travers chris.trav...@gmail.com wrote:
So people are using PostgreSQL in roles that aren't very visible anyway,
DBA's are usually coming to PostgreSQL from other RDBMS's, and
Here's a bit of positive news spin - in a backhanded way perhaps, but still a
compliment:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/08/31/postgresql_too_cool_for_school/
Oliver
www.agilebase.co.uk
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 19:14:28 -0700
Chris Travers chris.trav...@gmail.com wrote:
So people are using PostgreSQL in roles that aren't very visible
anyway, DBA's are usually coming to PostgreSQL from other RDBMS's,
and few applications are really distributed for PostgreSQL.
I know a bunch of
On Î¤ÎµÏ 05 ΣεÏÏ 2012 10:51:49 Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote:
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 19:14:28 -0700
Chris Travers chris.trav...@gmail.com wrote:
So people are using PostgreSQL in roles that aren't very visible
anyway, DBA's are usually coming to PostgreSQL from other RDBMS's,
and few
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Achilleas Mantzios
ach...@smadev.internal.net wrote:
(single master, 80+ slaves in 80+ vessels in the 7 seas (80+ = 80 and
growning))
Cool!! How do your nodes communicate with each other? Is it an
off-line resynchronization, or do you maintain long-range
On Î¤ÎµÏ 05 ΣεÏÏ 2012 23:44:08 Chris Angelico wrote:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Achilleas Mantzios
ach...@smadev.internal.net wrote:
(single master, 80+ slaves in 80+ vessels in the 7 seas (80+ = 80 and
growning))
Cool!! How do your nodes communicate with each other? Is it an
MySQL doesn't even support self referential updates like
update t1 set c1 ='value' where t1.id not in (select id from t1 where id
100);
Nor is it fully ACID compliant.
And its online documentation is a nightmare.
PgAdmin is infintely better than mysql workbench, heck anything is better
than
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 12:43:15AM +0200, Geert Mak wrote:
There is this case studies section as well -
http://www.postgresql.org/about/casestudies/
Which appear to me a little old and a little too little, one could try to
I dunno, perhaps I don't get out the office enough, but I just don't
hear about MySQL any more.
I think this thread is tilting at windmills.
A few years ago about 1 in 2 contracts we had was with a start-up using
MySQL.
The other half were using either PG or Oracle or SQLServer. The years
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:40 AM, Achilleas Mantzios
ach...@smadev.internal.net wrote:
On Τετ 05 Σεπτ 2012 10:51:49 Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote:
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 19:14:28 -0700
Chris Travers chris.trav...@gmail.com wrote:
So people are using PostgreSQL in roles that aren't very
Regarding MySQL vs PostgreSQL:
MySQL is what you get when app developers build a database server.
PostgreSQL is what you get when db developers build a development platform.
There really isn't anything more to say about it.
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Andy Yoder ayo...@airfacts.com wrote:
Hello all,
I would like the community's input on a topic. The words too far out of
the mainstream are from an e-mail we received from one of our clients,
describing the concern our client's IT group has about our use of
Em 05/09/2012 23:49, Chris Travers escreveu:
Regarding MySQL vs PostgreSQL:
MySQL is what you get when app developers build a database server.
PostgreSQL is what you get when db developers build a development
platform.
There really isn't anything more to say about it.
This kind of claim is
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Edson Richter edsonrich...@hotmail.com wrote:
Em 05/09/2012 23:49, Chris Travers escreveu:
Regarding MySQL vs PostgreSQL:
MySQL is what you get when app developers build a database server.
PostgreSQL is what you get when db developers build a development
Em 06/09/2012 00:39, Scott Marlowe escreveu:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Edson Richter edsonrich...@hotmail.com wrote:
Em 05/09/2012 23:49, Chris Travers escreveu:
Regarding MySQL vs PostgreSQL:
MySQL is what you get when app developers build a database server.
PostgreSQL is what you get
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Edson Richter edsonrich...@hotmail.comwrote:
Em 05/09/2012 23:49, Chris Travers escreveu:
Regarding MySQL vs PostgreSQL:
MySQL is what you get when app developers build a database server.
PostgreSQL is what you get when db developers build a development
On 08/31/2012 01:05 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
..Anyone who thinks that
MySQL, with its sketchy guarantees of data integrity and persistence,
is mainstream-acceptable but Postgres isn't because they haven't read
about it in InfoWorld
And if they want to read about it in InfoWorld, they can:
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Geert Mak po...@verysmall.org wrote:
I have been looking into heroku lately, they run on PostgreSQL -
https://postgres.heroku.com/postgres
Went out to lunch with a guy who worked for Redfin as well. I guess
they're all Postgres over there too..
--
Sent via
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Mike Christensen m...@kitchenpc.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Geert Mak po...@verysmall.org wrote:
I have been looking into heroku lately, they run on PostgreSQL -
https://postgres.heroku.com/postgres
Went out to lunch with a guy who worked for
Andy Yoder ayo...@airfacts.com wrote:
I would like the community's input on a topic. The words too far
out of the mainstream are from an e-mail we received from one of
our clients, describing the concern our client's IT group has
about our use of PostgreSQL in our shop. The group in
On 05/09/12 05:35, Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Mike Christensen m...@kitchenpc.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Geert Mak po...@verysmall.org wrote:
I have been looking into heroku lately, they run on PostgreSQL -
https://postgres.heroku.com/postgres
Went
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Gavin Flower
gavinflo...@archidevsys.co.nz wrote:
On 05/09/12 05:35, Scott Marlowe wrote:
I have read to emails to one of the postgresql lists,
where people in companies with 1000's of databases had
power failures and only the postgresql databases
restarted
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Gavin Flower
gavinflo...@archidevsys.co.nz wrote:
On 05/09/12 08:38, Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Gavin Flower
gavinflo...@archidevsys.co.nz wrote:
On 05/09/12 05:35, Scott Marlowe wrote:
I have read to emails to one of the postgresql
Since this PGCon 2011 page has no slides -
http://www.pgcon.org/2011/schedule/events/361.en.html
I Googled for sharding and PostgreSQL and I found this -
http://www.databasesoup.com/2012/04/sharding-postgres-with-instagram.html
On Tuesday last week we had a terrific SFPUG meeting at which Mike
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.comwrote:
Since there's no reporting requirements for using postgresql
commercially etc, it's kind of a stealth database. It's all over the
place and nobody knows it. Meanwhile, finding qualified PostgreSQL
DBAs is pretty
On 05/09/12 08:38, Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Gavin Flower
gavinflo...@archidevsys.co.nz wrote:
On 05/09/12 05:35, Scott Marlowe wrote:
I have read to emails to one of the postgresql lists,
where people in companies with 1000's of databases had
power failures and only
Hi,
On 5 September 2012 12:14, Chris Travers chris.trav...@gmail.com wrote:
So people are using PostgreSQL in roles that aren't very visible anyway,
DBA's are usually coming to PostgreSQL from other RDBMS's, and few
applications are really distributed for PostgreSQL.
snip
Not only
this
I have been looking into heroku lately, they run on PostgreSQL -
https://postgres.heroku.com/postgres
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
On 04/09/12 10:38, Geert Mak wrote:
I have been looking into heroku lately, they run on PostgreSQL -
https://postgres.heroku.com/postgres
PostgreSQL is the database of choice for reliable web-applications.
Is what they say on that page, not mincing words are they?
Cheers,
Gavin
--
Sent
Chris Travers chris.trav...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:CAKt_ZfvZfYq_VPYXG3p=fy=s1whcc0p9trxkczfrrsjsqms...@mail.gmail.com...
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Andy Yoder ayo...@airfacts.com wrote:
Hello all,
I would like the community's input on a topic. The words too far
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Chris Travers chris.trav...@gmail.com
wrote:
1) While MySQL is perhaps better marketed, PostgreSQL is an older
project
with a proud heritage
On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 12:43:15AM +0200, Geert Mak wrote:
There is this case studies section as well -
http://www.postgresql.org/about/casestudies/
Which appear to me a little old and a little too little, one could try to add
more, perhaps.
I noticed that the Share Your Story link is
Em 31/08/2012 16:52, David Johnston escreveu:
-Original Message-
From: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-general-
ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Andy Yoder
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 3:25 PM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Cc: Andy Yoder
Subject: [GENERAL] Too far
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Andy Yoder ayo...@airfacts.com wrote:
Hello all,
I would like the community's input on a topic. The words too far out of
the mainstream are from an e-mail we received from one of our clients,
describing the concern our client's IT group has about our use of
On 9/1/2012 6:42 AM, Edson Richter wrote:
Nevertheless, when we present our product to customers, they won't get
satisfied until we guarantee we can run same product with major paid
versions (Oracle, MS SQL, and so on).
I think this is a business problem not a technology problem. Forget
trying
Wandering away from the original topic a little but helpful enough to
continue this line of reasoning here.
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 5:42 AM, Edson Richter edsonrich...@hotmail.comwrote:
It's an interesting thing.
We have a product that runs over PostgreSQL without any problems (well, we
have
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Chris Travers chris.trav...@gmail.com wrote:
1) While MySQL is perhaps better marketed, PostgreSQL is an older project
with a proud heritage (Informix started as a Postgres fork), and top-rate
Pretty sure that's not true. Ingres is a cousin of Postgres started
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Chris Travers chris.trav...@gmail.com
wrote:
1) While MySQL is perhaps better marketed, PostgreSQL is an older
project
with a proud heritage (Informix started as a Postgres fork),
Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Chris Travers chris.trav...@gmail.com wrote:
1) While MySQL is perhaps better marketed, PostgreSQL is an older project
with a proud heritage (Informix started as a Postgres fork), and top-rate
Pretty sure that's
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Chris Travers chris.trav...@gmail.com
wrote:
1) While MySQL is perhaps better marketed, PostgreSQL is an older project
with a proud heritage
2012/9/1 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Chris Travers chris.trav...@gmail.com
wrote:
1) While MySQL is perhaps better marketed, PostgreSQL is an older project
with a proud heritage (Informix started as a Postgres
2012/9/1 Chris Travers chris.trav...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Andy Yoder ayo...@airfacts.com wrote:
Hello all,
I would like the community's input on a topic. The words too far out of
the mainstream are from an e-mail we received from one of our clients,
describing the
On 09/01/2012 01:24 PM, Peter Bex wrote:
On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 12:43:15AM +0200, Geert Mak wrote:
There is this case studies section as well -
http://www.postgresql.org/about/casestudies/
Which appear to me a little old and a little too little, one could try to
add more, perhaps.
I
Hello all,
I would like the community's input on a topic. The words too far out of the
mainstream are from an e-mail we received from one of our clients, describing
the concern our client's IT group has about our use of PostgreSQL in our shop.
The group in question supports multiple
So do they ever go to a site that ends in .org or .info? Tell them to
stop it right now, as they are relying on PostgreSQL for those sites
to resolve, and PostgreSQL is too far out of the mainstream. Once
they've stopped using or visiting .org and .info sites tell them to
get back to you.
On
-Original Message-
From: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-general-
ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Andy Yoder
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 3:25 PM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Cc: Andy Yoder
Subject: [GENERAL] Too far out of the mainstream
Hello all,
I
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 02:25:13PM -0500, Andy Yoder wrote:
I would like the community's input on a topic. The words too far
out of the mainstream are from an e-mail we received from one of
our clients, describing the concern our client's IT group has about
our use of PostgreSQL in our shop.
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Andrew Sullivan a...@crankycanuck.ca wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 02:25:13PM -0500, Andy Yoder wrote:
I would like the community's input on a topic. The words too far
out of the mainstream are from an e-mail we received from one of
our clients, describing
On Aug 31, 2012, at 12:45 PM, Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com wrote:
So do they ever go to a site that ends in .org or .info? Tell them to
stop it right now, as they are relying on PostgreSQL for those sites
to resolve, and PostgreSQL is too far out of the mainstream. Once
they've
A response to this sort of question from the .org TLD redelegation is
still available online:
http://archive.icann.org/en/tlds/org/questions-to-applicants-13.htm#Response13TheInternetSocietyISOC.
The details in that answer are all obsolete, of course, since it's
from several years (and
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 04:00:06PM -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
One of the most fascinating things to come out of the whole Afilias
winning the right to host the .org and .info domains was Oracle's PR
response to the suggestion of using postgresql. Wish I could find it.
It was only the .org
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Steve Atkins st...@blighty.com wrote:
On Aug 31, 2012, at 12:45 PM, Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com wrote:
So do they ever go to a site that ends in .org or .info? Tell them to
stop it right now, as they are relying on PostgreSQL for those sites
to
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Andrew Sullivan a...@crankycanuck.ca wrote:
Anyway, this is all an amusing walk down memory lane. Thanks for the
reminder!
Hard to believe it was so long ago!
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
On Aug 31, 2012, at 4:15 PM, Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com wrote:
Unless things have changed, Andrew Sullivan in this message
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-advocacy/2002-09/msg00012.php
says:
All interactions with the shared registry system, and any whois
queries against
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 03:14:30PM -0700, Steve Atkins wrote:
Mmm. Don't push this line of argument too hard. As I understand it,
Postgresql is used by the registry to keep track of their customers -
whois data, effectively.
No, the Postgres back end in the Afilias implementation I worked on
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 04:31:09PM -0700, Steve Atkins wrote:
dot-org is actually powered by UltraDNS tech (since bought out by
Afilias) rather than bind. And that is directly SQL database backed,
though likely not the database we know and love.
No, it is not.
Afilias did not buy UltraDNS.
57 matches
Mail list logo
