On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 10:10:50AM +0200, Houssais Hugues wrote:
Each distant database works on its own domain of data. Then no conflict
should happen during updates.
One thing I have not specified is that the distant databases don't handle
global data but only data collected at the local
databases to one
global database. But maybe I'm wrong... Can you tell me more about this use of
Slony?
Hugues
-Message d'origine-
De : Scott Marlowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : vendredi 5 mai 2006 19:10
À : Houssais Hugues
Cc : pgsql general
Objet : Re: [GENERAL] Unify distant
Hi,
We desire to implement a multi-site server that unifies
data from distant Postgres databases in a nightly batch. The distant databases
have all the same architecture (schema). The size of data exchanged between
distant servers and the multi-site manager has to be reduced to the
On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 04:21, Houssais Hugues wrote:
Hi,
We desire to implement a multi-site server that unifies data from
distant Postgres databases in a nightly batch. The distant databases
have all the same architecture (schema). The size of data exchanged
between distant servers and the
