On 06/01/2010 03:34 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Ivan Sergio Borgonovo m...@webthatworks.it writes:
On Mon, 31 May 2010 08:47:25 -0600
Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com wrote:
Pgsql is pretty easy to build from source.
Yeah it is. But what is it going to be an upgrade process? On a
production
On Wednesday 02 June 2010 07.51:50 Bret S. Lambert wrote:
Getting the wrong answer fast is not an
improvement over the right answer slow.
Doesn't match reality. Listened to any politicians lately?
(sorry, couldn't resist.)
-- vbi
--
In seiner mit Hochspannung erwarteten Rede zur Lage der
2010/5/31 Devrim Gündüz dev...@gunduz.org:
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 21:14 +0530, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
if you install some libraries like python clients or some
software depending on PgSql from the repositories in RPM/DPKG based
OS, you will have a tough time with the dependency stuff.
On Monday 31 May 2010 10.29:22 Michal Szymanski wrote:
for Debian sometimes we had to wait many weeks for
official packages.
FWIW: I've just noticed that Debian experimental carries pg 9.0beta1, it was
uploaded 3.5., so thats not bad, taking into account that it was released
only a few days
Michal Szymanski dy...@poczta.onet.pl writes:
Hi,
Currently we use Debian, but it chosen by our OS admnistrator. Now we
can change our OS and it is question what Linux edition will be the
best. We would like have access to new versions of Postgres as soon
as possible, for Debian sometimes we
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Adrian von Bidder avbid...@fortytwo.ch wrote:
On Monday 31 May 2010 10.29:22 Michal Szymanski wrote:
for Debian sometimes we had to wait many weeks for
official packages.
Experiemntal packages can be installed directly into Debian unstable (sid)
installations
2010/5/31 Nilesh Govindarajan li...@itech7.com:
I run my site (see my signature) on a self managed VPS. I was using
the default PGSQL RPM from the fedora repository, the site was getting
way slow. So I compiled all the stuff apache, php and postgresql with
custom gcc flags, which improved
On 05/31/2010 01:29 AM, Michal Szymanski wrote:
Hi,
Currently we use Debian, but it chosen by our OS admnistrator. Now we
can change our OS and it is question what Linux edition will be the
best. We would like have access to new versions of Postgres as soon
as possible, for Debian sometimes we
In response to Steve Crawford scrawf...@pinpointresearch.com:
On 05/31/2010 01:29 AM, Michal Szymanski wrote:
Hi,
Currently we use Debian, but it chosen by our OS admnistrator. Now we
can change our OS and it is question what Linux edition will be the
best. We would like have access to
On 1 Jun 2010, at 22:03, Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Steve Crawford scrawf...@pinpointresearch.com:
On 05/31/2010 01:29 AM, Michal Szymanski wrote:
Hi,
Currently we use Debian, but it chosen by our OS admnistrator. Now we
can change our OS and it is question what Linux edition will be
Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
I run my site (see my signature) on a self managed VPS. I was using
the default PGSQL RPM from the fedora repository, the site was getting
way slow. So I compiled all the stuff apache, php and postgresql with
custom gcc flags, which improved performance like hell
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 01:32:44AM -0400, Greg Smith wrote:
Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
I run my site (see my signature) on a self managed VPS. I was using
the default PGSQL RPM from the fedora repository, the site was getting
way slow. So I compiled all the stuff apache, php and postgresql
Hi,
Currently we use Debian, but it chosen by our OS admnistrator. Now we
can change our OS and it is question what Linux edition will be the
best. We would like have access to new versions of Postgres as soon
as possible, for Debian sometimes we had to wait many weeks for
official packages.
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Michal Szymanski dy...@poczta.onet.pl wrote:
Hi,
Currently we use Debian, but it chosen by our OS admnistrator. Now we
can change our OS and it is question what Linux edition will be the
best. We would like have access to new versions of Postgres as soon
as
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Michal Szymanski dy...@poczta.onet.pl wrote:
Hi,
Currently we use Debian, but it chosen by our OS admnistrator. Now we
can change our OS and it is question what Linux edition will be the
best. We would like have access to new versions of Postgres as soon
as
Michal Szymanski dy...@poczta.onet.pl wrote:
Hi,
Currently we use Debian, but it chosen by our OS admnistrator. Now we
can change our OS and it is question what Linux edition will be the
best. We would like have access to new versions of Postgres as soon
With which distribution you are
2010/5/31 Michal Szymanski dy...@poczta.onet.pl
Hi,
Currently we use Debian, but it chosen by our OS admnistrator. Now we
can change our OS and it is question what Linux edition will be the
best. We would like have access to new versions of Postgres as soon
as possible, for Debian sometimes
On Mon, 31 May 2010 08:47:25 -0600
Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Michal Szymanski
dy...@poczta.onet.pl wrote:
Hi,
Currently we use Debian, but it chosen by our OS admnistrator.
Now we can change our OS and it is question what Linux edition
2010/5/31 Ivan Sergio Borgonovo m...@webthatworks.it
On Mon, 31 May 2010 08:47:25 -0600
Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Michal Szymanski
dy...@poczta.onet.pl wrote:
Hi,
Currently we use Debian, but it chosen by our OS admnistrator.
Now
Ivan Sergio Borgonovo m...@webthatworks.it writes:
On Mon, 31 May 2010 08:47:25 -0600
Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com wrote:
Pgsql is pretty easy to build from source.
Yeah it is. But what is it going to be an upgrade process? On a
production box?
If it makes you feel better, build
You should use whatever you are comfortable with.
I would go with ArchLinux for its ease of use and making packages. RPM
and DPKG are much harder to build than ArchLinux's .pkg.tar.xz
Also, if you install some libraries like python clients or some
software depending on PgSql from the repositories
Le lundi 31 mai 2010 10:23:51, Szymon Guz a écrit :
2010/5/31 Ivan Sergio Borgonovo m...@webthatworks.it
On Mon, 31 May 2010 08:47:25 -0600
Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Michal Szymanski
dy...@poczta.onet.pl wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Michal Szymanski dy...@poczta.onet.pl
wrote:
Hi,
Currently we use Debian, but it chosen by our OS admnistrator. Now we
can change our OS and it is question what Linux edition will
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 21:14 +0530, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
if you install some libraries like python clients or some
software depending on PgSql from the repositories in RPM/DPKG based
OS, you will have a tough time with the dependency stuff.
Really?
--
Devrim Gündüz dev...@gunduz.org
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 08:47 -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
Pgsql is pretty easy to build from source.
Right, but some sysadmins don't want to see development libraries on the
machines.
--
Devrim Gündüz dev...@gunduz.org
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 01:29 -0700, Michal Szymanski wrote:
Currently we use Debian, but it chosen by our OS admnistrator. Now we
can change our OS and it is question what Linux edition will be the
best. We would like have access to new versions of Postgres as soon
as possible, for Debian
On Monday 31 May 2010, Devrim Gündüz dev...@gunduz.org wrote:
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 21:14 +0530, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
if you install some libraries like python clients or some
software depending on PgSql from the repositories in RPM/DPKG based
OS, you will have a tough time with the
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 4:40 AM, Alan Hodgson ahodg...@simkin.ca wrote:
On Monday 31 May 2010, Devrim Gündüz dev...@gunduz.org wrote:
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 21:14 +0530, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
if you install some libraries like python clients or some
software depending on PgSql from the
Hi,
I run debian/testing since years and it is the best in my opinion.
Besides the fact that new versions come in quite fast (after the wait
phase from unstable to testing) the upgrade for major versions (eg 8.3
to 8.4) is very simple as it does not override the old files but does
a parallel
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 6:38 AM, Clemens Schwaighofer
clemens_schwaigho...@e-gra.co.jp wrote:
Hi,
I run debian/testing since years and it is the best in my opinion.
Besides the fact that new versions come in quite fast (after the wait
phase from unstable to testing) the upgrade for major
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 11:30, Nilesh Govindarajan li...@itech7.com wrote:
Nope; you're wrong. Even RPM doesn't remove the data. But its always
safer to keep a backup.
I am not talking about removing the data I am talking of not beeing
able to access it because the database itself is still in
Michal Szymanski wrote:
Currently we use Debian, but it chosen by our OS admnistrator. Now we
can change our OS and it is question what Linux edition will be the
best. We would like have access to new versions of Postgres as soon
as possible, for Debian sometimes we had to wait many weeks for
On Tuesday 01 June 2010 03.08:06 Clemens Schwaighofer wrote:
Besides the fact that new versions come in quite fast (after the wait
phase from unstable to testing)
... and you can always mix testing and unstable. If your testing
installation is not too old, usually not much fiddling with
Heyho!
On Tuesday 01 June 2010 06.01:02 Greg Smith wrote:
Put a little time into learning how to build
your own packages instead, to work around this one perceived flaw, and
you'll be way ahead of the mess that comes with switching distributions
altogether.
Note that we can always use
Hi,
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 06:59 +0530, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
Self compilation has the advantage of custom gcc flags like -O3 -march
-msse, etc. which can improve performance.
I started to think that you have zero idea about building binary
packages.
Building RPMs is not a task that
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 07:20 +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
Packaging stuff for Debian is not magic, it's just Makefiles,
Perl/shell scripts and stuff like this.
Given that *even I* ( :P ) could build a few 8.2 .deb packages for my
previous employer, I also want to confirm that building .debs
2010/6/1 Devrim GÜNDÜZ dev...@gunduz.org:
Hi,
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 06:59 +0530, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
Self compilation has the advantage of custom gcc flags like -O3 -march
-msse, etc. which can improve performance.
I started to think that you have zero idea about building binary
37 matches
Mail list logo
