Tom Lane wrote:
hubert depesz lubaczewski dep...@depesz.com writes:
was pointed to the fact that security definer functions have the same
default privileges as normal functions in the same language - i.e. if
the language is trusted - public has the right to execute them.
maybe i'm
was pointed to the fact that security definer functions have the same
default privileges as normal functions in the same language - i.e. if
the language is trusted - public has the right to execute them.
maybe i'm missing something important, but given the fact that security
definer
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
hubert depesz lubaczewski dep...@depesz.com writes:
was pointed to the fact that security definer functions have the same
default privileges as normal functions in the same language - i.e. if
the language is trusted - public
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 09:06:50AM +0200, pasman pasmański wrote:
was pointed to the fact that security definer functions have the same
default privileges as normal functions in the same language - i.e. if
the language is trusted - public has the right to execute them.
maybe i'm missing
On 04/06/2011 07:41 AM, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 09:06:50AM +0200, pasman pasmański wrote:
was pointed to the fact that security definer functions have the same
default privileges as normal functions in the same language - i.e. if
the language is trusted - public
hi
was pointed to the fact that security definer functions have the same
default privileges as normal functions in the same language - i.e. if
the language is trusted - public has the right to execute them.
maybe i'm missing something important, but given the fact that security
definer functions
On 04/05/2011 09:41 AM, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
hi
was pointed to the fact that security definer functions have the same
default privileges as normal functions in the same language - i.e. if
the language is trusted - public has the right to execute them.
maybe i'm missing something
hubert depesz lubaczewski dep...@depesz.com writes:
was pointed to the fact that security definer functions have the same
default privileges as normal functions in the same language - i.e. if
the language is trusted - public has the right to execute them.
maybe i'm missing something
