Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
...in favor of renaming the database Horizontica.
...should definitely be HorizonticaSQL
Surely that should be capitalized HorizonticASQL, no.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will
On 9/12/07, Ron Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
...in favor of renaming the database Horizontica.
...should definitely be HorizonticaSQL
Surely that should be capitalized HorizonticASQL, no.
I can just see it now.
I've been using Horizont and
followed by
On 9/9/07, Scott Marlowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey! Some of us just figured out how to pronounce PostgreSQL properly.
Postgreh SeeQuell??
/me ducks
--
Please don't top post, and don't use HTML e-Mail :} Make your quotes concise.
http://www.american.edu/econ/notes/htmlmail.htm
%' order by last;
++---+---+
| id | first | last |
++---+---+
| 1 | Jack | Ja |
| 2 | Jill | Ji |
++---+---+
(2 rows)
howto get flip result from vertical??
sincerely
siva
Original Message
Subject: [GENERAL] an other provokative question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Given past history of this project and its relation to
Stonebraker, I was tempted earlier today to suggest that
the Postgres vs. PostgreSQL renaming argument be dropped
in favor of renaming the database Horizontica.
That name could be
On 9/7/07, Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... renaming the database Horizontica.
Following the naming convention, wouldn't it be Horizonta?
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
On 9/8/07, Greg Sabino Mullane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Given past history of this project and its relation to
Stonebraker, I was tempted earlier today to suggest that
the Postgres vs. PostgreSQL renaming argument be dropped
in favor
On Fri, 7 Sep 2007, Ron Johnson wrote:
Definitely a niche product.
Stonebraker's commentary was unfortunately spun by the ComputerWorld
columnist. I hope people followed the link to his actual blog entry at
http://www.databasecolumn.com/2007/09/one-size-fits-all.html where his
arguement
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/07/07 01:37, Greg Smith wrote:
On Fri, 7 Sep 2007, Ron Johnson wrote:
Definitely a niche product.
Stonebraker's commentary was unfortunately spun by the ComputerWorld
columnist.
Tech journalist morphing reality to make a provocative
Relational database pioneer says technology is obsolete
The headline is grossly misleading; the article is only somewhat less
misleading. The actual blog entry:
- Does not claim that relational databases per se are obsolete;
- Claims that the idea of a single one size fits all implementation
Greg Smith wrote:
the idea of one database approach always being right
just isn't true anyway.
Or one software development approach or one application runtime approach
or ... . One of the major contributions of the relational model
compared to the myriad network model implementations
Relational database pioneer says technology is obsolete
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasicarticleId=9034619
kindlt explain how??
sincerely
siva
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched our list
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:pgsql-general-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 12:33 PM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: [GENERAL] an other provokative question??
Relational database pioneer says
Dann Corbit wrote:
All of the database systems
that I know of that use this column-oriented scheme are in-memory
database systems. I don't know if Mr. Stonebraker's is also.
KDB+ (http://kx.com/) is column-oriented and has both on-disk
and in-memory capabilities http://kx.com/faq/#6 . It's
Erik Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm curious, given that Postgres wasn't even an SQL-centric database
when the original project ended, how much of the current Postgres
code base still contains code from the original project before the
incorporation of SQl rename to PostgreSQL?
You
On Sep 6, 2007, at 10:54 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Dann Corbit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Relational database pioneer says technology is obsolete
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?
command=3DviewArticleBasicarticleId=3D9034619
This bit is a hint:
Column-oriented databases -- such as
Dann Corbit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Relational database pioneer says technology is obsolete
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=3DviewArticleBasicarticleId=3D9034619
This bit is a hint:
Column-oriented databases -- such as the one built by Stonebraker's
latest start-up,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/06/07 22:54, Tom Lane wrote:
Dann Corbit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Relational database pioneer says technology is obsolete
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=3DviewArticleBasicarticleId=3D9034619
This bit is a hint:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Relational database pioneer says technology is obsolete
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasicarticleId=9034619
kindlt explain how??
There are several spins relevant to this:
1. He's trying to sell His New Thing, and it certainly
19 matches
Mail list logo
