On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Nick Raj nickrajj...@gmail.com writes:
Andrew Sullivan a...@crankycanuck.ca wrote:
It sounds like your index can't actually be used to satisfy your
query. Without seeing the table definition, index definition, and
On 24 May 2011, at 8:22, Nick Raj wrote:
One think i am not able to understand is, if i use ndpoint_overlap method it
is going for seq. scan every time but if i use operator it is using index
scan. Why it is so?
Why these is happening?
Tom already explained that, but in short: Because a
Hi,
I have build an index. When, i execute the query, it gives the result by
sequential scan, not by using my index.
I have already run vacuum analyze to collect some statistics regarding
table.
May be sequential scan is giving faster execution time than my indexing. But
i want to know how much
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 05:31:04PM +0530, Nick Raj wrote:
Hi,
I have build an index. When, i execute the query, it gives the result by
sequential scan, not by using my index.
For that, i have set enable_seqscan=off in postgresql.conf. But it still
going through sequential scan.
It sounds
Andrew Sullivan a...@crankycanuck.ca wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 05:31:04PM +0530, Nick Raj wrote:
Hi,
I have build an index. When, i execute the query, it gives the result by
sequential scan, not by using my index.
For that, i have set enable_seqscan=off in postgresql.conf. But it
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Andreas Kretschmer
akretsch...@spamfence.net wrote:
Andrew Sullivan a...@crankycanuck.ca wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 05:31:04PM +0530, Nick Raj wrote:
Hi,
I have build an index. When, i execute the query, it gives the result
by
sequential scan,
Nick Raj nickrajj...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Andreas Kretschmer
akretsch...@spamfence.net
wrote:
Andrew Sullivan a...@crankycanuck.ca wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 05:31:04PM +0530, Nick Raj wrote:
Hi,
I have build an index. When, i
Nick Raj nickrajj...@gmail.com writes:
Andrew Sullivan a...@crankycanuck.ca wrote:
It sounds like your index can't actually be used to satisfy your
query. Without seeing the table definition, index definition, and
query, however, it's pretty hard to give you a real answer.
explain analyze
