On 2/11/14, 6:25 PM, Vik Fearing wrote:
> I personally find Markdown to be more pleasing to the eye than AsciiDoc.
Markdown can embed HTML tables, so there is nothing that we need to
implement.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscr
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 08:48:49AM +0100, Gabriele Bartolini wrote:
> I second Bruce. I massively use asciidoc. I guess adding both asciidoc and md
> would not be too hard.
Agreed. Assuming there are no objections, I will add it to the TODO
list.
--
Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 06:02:29AM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Perhaps, but if we're going to add a text markup format then we'll have
> to choose one out of many.
>
> I personally find Markdown to be more pleasing to the eye than AsciiDoc.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markdown
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 03:32:32PM -0800, Steve Atkins wrote:
>
> On Feb 11, 2014, at 2:56 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Someone suggested that 'asciidoc'
> > (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AsciiDoc) would be a good output format
> > for psql, similar to the existing output formats of html, late
> From: Bruce Momjian
> To: PostgreSQL-general
> Sent: Tuesday, 11 February 2014, 22:56
> Subject: [GENERAL] pgsql and asciidoc output
>
> Someone suggested that 'asciidoc'
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AsciiDoc) would be a good output format
> for ps
I second Bruce. I massively use asciidoc. I guess adding both asciidoc and
md would not be too hard.
Thanks,
Gabriele
--
Gabriele Bartolini - 2ndQuadrant Italia
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
gabriele.bartol...@2ndquadrant.it | www.2ndQuadrant.it
2014-02-12 6:02 GMT+01:00 Pavel St
2014-02-12 0:25 GMT+01:00 Vik Fearing :
> On 02/11/2014 11:56 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Someone suggested that 'asciidoc'
> > (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AsciiDoc) would be a good output format
> > for psql, similar to the existing output formats of html, latex, and
> > troff.
> >
> > Would t
On Feb 11, 2014, at 2:56 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Someone suggested that 'asciidoc'
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AsciiDoc) would be a good output format
> for psql, similar to the existing output formats of html, latex, and
> troff.
>
> Would this be useful?
Less so than Markdown[1], IMO.
On 02/11/2014 11:56 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Someone suggested that 'asciidoc'
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AsciiDoc) would be a good output format
> for psql, similar to the existing output formats of html, latex, and
> troff.
>
> Would this be useful?
>
Perhaps, but if we're going to add a
Someone suggested that 'asciidoc'
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AsciiDoc) would be a good output format
for psql, similar to the existing output formats of html, latex, and
troff.
Would this be useful?
--
Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http:
10 matches
Mail list logo