Re: [GENERAL] pgsql and asciidoc output

2014-02-12 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 2/11/14, 6:25 PM, Vik Fearing wrote: > I personally find Markdown to be more pleasing to the eye than AsciiDoc. Markdown can embed HTML tables, so there is nothing that we need to implement. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscr

Re: [GENERAL] pgsql and asciidoc output

2014-02-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 08:48:49AM +0100, Gabriele Bartolini wrote: > I second Bruce. I massively use asciidoc. I guess adding both asciidoc and md > would not be too hard. Agreed. Assuming there are no objections, I will add it to the TODO list. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us

Re: [GENERAL] pgsql and asciidoc output

2014-02-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 06:02:29AM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: > Perhaps, but if we're going to add a text markup format then we'll have > to choose one out of many. > > I personally find Markdown to be more pleasing to the eye than AsciiDoc. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markdown

Re: [GENERAL] pgsql and asciidoc output

2014-02-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 03:32:32PM -0800, Steve Atkins wrote: > > On Feb 11, 2014, at 2:56 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Someone suggested that 'asciidoc' > > (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AsciiDoc) would be a good output format > > for psql, similar to the existing output formats of html, late

Re: [GENERAL] pgsql and asciidoc output

2014-02-12 Thread Glyn Astill
> From: Bruce Momjian > To: PostgreSQL-general > Sent: Tuesday, 11 February 2014, 22:56 > Subject: [GENERAL] pgsql and asciidoc output > > Someone suggested that 'asciidoc' > (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AsciiDoc) would be a good output format > for ps

Re: [GENERAL] pgsql and asciidoc output

2014-02-11 Thread Gabriele Bartolini
I second Bruce. I massively use asciidoc. I guess adding both asciidoc and md would not be too hard. Thanks, Gabriele -- Gabriele Bartolini - 2ndQuadrant Italia PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support gabriele.bartol...@2ndquadrant.it | www.2ndQuadrant.it 2014-02-12 6:02 GMT+01:00 Pavel St

Re: [GENERAL] pgsql and asciidoc output

2014-02-11 Thread Pavel Stehule
2014-02-12 0:25 GMT+01:00 Vik Fearing : > On 02/11/2014 11:56 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Someone suggested that 'asciidoc' > > (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AsciiDoc) would be a good output format > > for psql, similar to the existing output formats of html, latex, and > > troff. > > > > Would t

Re: [GENERAL] pgsql and asciidoc output

2014-02-11 Thread Steve Atkins
On Feb 11, 2014, at 2:56 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Someone suggested that 'asciidoc' > (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AsciiDoc) would be a good output format > for psql, similar to the existing output formats of html, latex, and > troff. > > Would this be useful? Less so than Markdown[1], IMO.

Re: [GENERAL] pgsql and asciidoc output

2014-02-11 Thread Vik Fearing
On 02/11/2014 11:56 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Someone suggested that 'asciidoc' > (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AsciiDoc) would be a good output format > for psql, similar to the existing output formats of html, latex, and > troff. > > Would this be useful? > Perhaps, but if we're going to add a

[GENERAL] pgsql and asciidoc output

2014-02-11 Thread Bruce Momjian
Someone suggested that 'asciidoc' (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AsciiDoc) would be a good output format for psql, similar to the existing output formats of html, latex, and troff. Would this be useful? -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http: