On 19 May 2011 04:08, Craig Ringer cr...@postnewspapers.com.au wrote:
On 05/19/2011 04:33 AM, Szymon Guz wrote:
On 18 May 2011 22:22, Ireneusz Pluta ipl...@wp.pl
mailto:ipl...@wp.pl wrote:
W dniu 2011-05-18 13:21, Szymon Guz pisze:
Hi,
I've got a question about quite a
On 05/18/11 11:39 PM, Szymon Guz wrote:
thanks for the answer. It is not a problem to have 3 oracle instances,
in fact there will be hundreds of them probably, but could also be
hundreds of Postgres instances :)
do you have any idea how EXPENSIVE 100s of Oracle RAC nodes are annually?
to
On 19 May 2011 09:05, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 05/18/11 11:39 PM, Szymon Guz wrote:
thanks for the answer. It is not a problem to have 3 oracle instances, in
fact there will be hundreds of them probably, but could also be hundreds of
Postgres instances :)
do you have
I have no idea how expensive it is, but fortunately that's not my
problem :) I was only asked about the possibility of running Postgres
that way.
And by the way: how expensive is that?
something like US$23000 per CPU core for the RAC option for Oracle
Enterprise. so a 100 node cluster
On 05/19/2011 03:25 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
I have no idea how expensive it is, but fortunately that's not my
problem :) I was only asked about the possibility of running Postgres
that way.
And by the way: how expensive is that?
something like US$23000 per CPU core for the RAC option for
Szymon Guz wrote:
I've got a question about quite a strange configuration.
I was asked if we can have one storage, with one data directory where one
postgresql
instance writes data, and many other instances read those.
Is that possible without any replication and copying data?
Why do they
Hi,
I've got a question about quite a strange configuration.
I was asked if we can have one storage, with one data directory where one
postgresql instance writes data, and many other instances read those.
Is that possible without any replication and copying data?
regards
Szymon
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Szymon Guz mabew...@gmail.com wrote:
I've got a question about quite a strange configuration.
I was asked if we can have one storage, with one data directory where one
postgresql instance writes data, and many other instances read those.
Is that possible
W dniu 2011-05-18 13:21, Szymon Guz pisze:
Hi,
I've got a question about quite a strange configuration.
I was asked if we can have one storage, with one data directory where one postgresql instance
writes data, and many other instances read those.
Is that possible without any replication and
On 18 May 2011 22:22, Ireneusz Pluta ipl...@wp.pl wrote:
W dniu 2011-05-18 13:21, Szymon Guz pisze:
Hi,
I've got a question about quite a strange configuration.
I was asked if we can have one storage, with one data directory where one
postgresql instance writes data, and many other
...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-general-
ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Ireneusz Pluta
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 4:22 PM
To: Szymon Guz
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] question about readonly instances
W dniu 2011-05-18 13:21, Szymon Guz pisze:
Hi,
I've
I have no idea what type of storage that you are using, but we utilize
NetApp storage and use Flexclones to create multiple read-only copies of a
master database. The flexclone takes seconds to configure and essentially
only consume delta space. Works great so far.
Terry
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at
On 05/19/2011 04:33 AM, Szymon Guz wrote:
On 18 May 2011 22:22, Ireneusz Pluta ipl...@wp.pl
mailto:ipl...@wp.pl wrote:
W dniu 2011-05-18 13:21, Szymon Guz pisze:
Hi,
I've got a question about quite a strange configuration.
I was asked if we can have one storage,
13 matches
Mail list logo
