Re: [GENERAL] Background worker plus language handler for Andl: OK?

2016-04-25 Thread david
> ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of David Wilson > I've been reading your posts over the past few days and while I find it fun > to follow, I can't help but wonder why there there is urgency in > reimplementing a protocol within PG itself. I think it's an interesting problem -- glad you find it

Re: [GENERAL] Background worker plus language handler for Andl: OK?

2016-04-25 Thread David Wilson
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 03:18:30PM +1000, da...@andl.org wrote: > It seems to me that it should be possible to create a language front > end for Andl by creating a background worker and a language handler. I've been reading your posts over the past few days and while I find it fun to follow, I