Re: [GENERAL] Compatibility of libpg

On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 7:32 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 5/4/2017 2:19 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 11:31 PM, John R Pierce > wrote: > >> On 5/3/2017 2:20 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> >>> >>> Please note that this method of

Re: [GENERAL] Compatibility of libpg

On 5/4/2017 2:19 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 11:31 PM, John R Pierce > wrote: On 5/3/2017 2:20 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: Please note that this method of building libpq has been removed from Postgres

Re: [GENERAL] Compatibility of libpg

On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 12:06 AM, Igor Korot wrote: > > On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Magnus Hagander > wrote: > > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 4:49 AM, Igor Korot wrote: > >> > >> John, > >> > >> On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 9:38 PM, John R

Re: [GENERAL] Compatibility of libpg

On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 11:31 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 5/3/2017 2:20 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > >> >> Please note that this method of building libpq has been removed from >> Postgres 10, so it's considered to be deprecated for quite some time. >> >> > this page

Re: [GENERAL] Compatibility of libpg

Hi, Magnus, On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 4:49 AM, Igor Korot wrote: >> >> John, >> >> On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 9:38 PM, John R Pierce wrote: >> > On 5/1/2017 5:44 PM, Igor Korot

Re: [GENERAL] Compatibility of libpg

On 5/3/2017 2:20 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: Please note that this method of building libpq has been removed from Postgres 10, so it's considered to be deprecated for quite some time. this page https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/install-windows-libpq.html probably should be

Re: [GENERAL] Compatibility of libpg

On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 4:49 AM, Igor Korot wrote: > John, > > On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 9:38 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > > On 5/1/2017 5:44 PM, Igor Korot wrote: > >> > >> > >> But I want to build from MSVC. I already have a solution for it. All I > >> need

Re: [GENERAL] Compatibility of libpg

John, On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 9:38 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 5/1/2017 5:44 PM, Igor Korot wrote: >> >> >> But I want to build from MSVC. I already have a solution for it. All I >> need is to create a project inside that solution which will build the dll >> and lib files

Re: [GENERAL] Compatibility of libpg

On 5/1/2017 5:44 PM, Igor Korot wrote: But I want to build from MSVC. I already have a solution for it. All I need is to create a project inside that solution which will build the dll and lib files for me. Or I have to use nmake? pretty sure you need to run the top level config script to

Re: [GENERAL] Compatibility of libpg

Hi, John, On May 1, 2017 8:00 PM, "John R Pierce" wrote: On 5/1/2017 4:28 PM, Igor Korot wrote: > Like I said, I don't have dll, I downloaded a source files and would > like to compile > the code myself from the MSVC. > > And I will use libpg calls directly. > build the

Re: [GENERAL] Compatibility of libpg

On 5/1/2017 4:28 PM, Igor Korot wrote: Like I said, I don't have dll, I downloaded a source files and would like to compile the code myself from the MSVC. And I will use libpg calls directly. build the postgres server, and it will generate the DLL, then link to that with your own apps.

Re: [GENERAL] Compatibility of libpg

Hi, Jihn, On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 6:33 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 5/1/2017 3:08 PM, Igor Korot wrote: >> >> Also - I want to create a project inside my MSVC 2010 solution and >> compile. >> Is there anything I need besides src/include and src/interface/libpg? > > > if

Re: [GENERAL] Compatibility of libpg

On 5/1/2017 3:08 PM, Igor Korot wrote: Also - I want to create a project inside my MSVC 2010 solution and compile. Is there anything I need besides src/include and src/interface/libpg? if you're using .NET stuff like adodb or oledb, you'll want the npgsql .net stuff for postgres. if you're