Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others

2000-08-15 Thread Ned Lilly
Oh, Dan, I'm not that clever... ;-) But I *can* tell you that the market leading proprietary RDBMS products we tested were not IBM, Informix, or Sybase. Regards, Ned Dan Browning wrote: Can you tell us what version of the (ahem) unnamed proprietary products you used? :-). For example

Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others

2000-08-15 Thread Ned Lilly
Hi Adrian, We only used the released versions of each database. We'd be happy to run the tests again when MySQL 3.23 is official, or when Interbase ships a real ODBC driver for 6.0 for that matter. Regards, Ned Adrian Phillips wrote: It would have been more interesting if MySQL 3.23 had

Re: [GENERAL] Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others

2000-08-15 Thread Ned Lilly
Mark Kirkwood wrote: In a related vein, is it possible that any relevant database parameter settings might be published to help folk get the best out of their Postgresql systems ? ( apologies if they are there and I missed them ) Hi Mark, here's some more info from the lead engineer on the

Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others

2000-08-15 Thread Ned Lilly
Doh! Sorry, I didn't cc Richard Brosnahan after all. He's at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ned Lilly wrote: Hi Jeff, i haven't played with interbase yet, but my understanding is they have two types of server -- the "classic" (process per connection?) and a "superserver" (multithreaded). i'm

Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others

2000-08-15 Thread Ross J. Reedstrom
On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 12:21:25PM -0400, Ned Lilly wrote: Oh, Dan, I'm not that clever... ;-) But I *can* tell you that the market leading proprietary RDBMS products we tested were not IBM, Informix, or Sybase. And in reply to the MySQL version comment/question, Ned said: "We only used

[GENERAL] Tuning PostgreSQL to use more RAM...

2000-08-15 Thread Steve Wolfe
Actually, more RAM would permit you to increase both the -B parameters as well as the -S one ... which are both noted for providing performance increases ... -B more on repeative queries and -S on anything involving ORDER BY or GROUP BY ... For a while now, I've been meaning to

[GENERAL] Interval examples

2000-08-15 Thread George Robinson II
Could someone please send me some examples of the interval data type? For example, what should the data look like in order to do and insert? If I have two iso time stamps, how can I insert them into the interval datatype? What are some ways to format the output of an interval type?

Re: [GENERAL]

2000-08-15 Thread Lee Johnson
just wondering is postgresq a program that will allow similar things as does microsofts's access..i use access for my current database for company.. cuz i've noticed in the description things like "server"..which i'm not on i'm end user of linux looking for good database for use in

Re: [GENERAL]

2000-08-15 Thread Lamar Owen
Lee Johnson wrote: just wondering is postgresq a program that will allow similar things as does microsofts's access..i use access for my current database for company.. cuz i've noticed in the description things like "server"..which i'm not on i'm end user of linux looking for

Re: [GENERAL]

2000-08-15 Thread Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Lee Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: cuz i've noticed in the description things like "server"..which i'm not on i'm end user of linux looking for good database for use in linux to switch over from using access.. postgresql is more of a competitor to Microsoft's SQL server than

[GENERAL] pg_dumpall problems

2000-08-15 Thread g
I need to know how to cast types. Here's my basic problem: I'm trying to: update products set list_price = gsa_price * 1.1 where list_price = gsa_price; The error I get back is: ERROR: Unable to identify an operator '*' for types 'numeric' and 'float8' You will have to retype this query using

Re: [GENERAL] bytea question

2000-08-15 Thread mjp
Oops! You have to write a function for it. Here is a sample quick C function: typedef struct { int len; char data[1]; } string; string *byteatostr(bytea *arg) { char buf[1024]; int ln,i; string *res; ln = VARSIZE(arg) - VARHDRSZ; memmove(buf,

Re: [GENERAL] bytea question

2000-08-15 Thread mjp
Oops! You have to write a function for it. Here is a sample quick C function: typedef struct { int len; char data[1]; } string; string *byteatostr(bytea *arg) { char buf[1024]; int ln,i; string *res; ln = VARSIZE(arg) - VARHDRSZ; memmove(buf,

Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others

2000-08-15 Thread Ned Lilly
"Ross J. Reedstrom" wrote: On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 12:21:25PM -0400, Ned Lilly wrote: Oh, Dan, I'm not that clever... ;-) But I *can* tell you that the market leading proprietary RDBMS products we tested were not IBM, Informix, or Sybase. And in reply to the MySQL version

[GENERAL] Building a library for PG

2000-08-15 Thread Franck Martin
I'm trying to build a library for PG to add some new types. I have suceeded to do it with no problems, but I would like to autoconf/automake the library, so I don't have to hard code the path for resources files, installation points, etc... Can anyone provide me with a standard configuration:

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL benchmark

2000-08-15 Thread David Lloyd-Jones
: "Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can any one comment on this: http://www.newsalert.com/bin/story?StoryId=CozDUWbKbytiXnZyFQ=LinuxNav=na- search-StoryTitle=Linux Why would anybody be surprised? The only possible weak point in PostgreSQL is its academic heritage -- but

[GENERAL] Problems after installing

2000-08-15 Thread J. Mauricio Cuenca H.
I've had problems after installing PostgreSQL 6.5.3 on Solaris 2.7 The sorce compiled well. but when I try to run the initdb command I get the following error: [6:34pm]-machine:/usr/local/pgsql/bin ./initdb --pglib=/usr/local/pgsql/lib ld.so.1: pg_id: fatal: libncurses.so.4: open failed: No such

Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others

2000-08-15 Thread Chris Bitmead
Ned Lilly wrote: Oh, Dan, I'm not that clever... ;-) But I *can* tell you that the market leading proprietary RDBMS products we tested were not IBM, Informix, or Sybase. That's very helpful. Can you also tell us if Proprietry 1 or Proprietry 2 was definitely NOT MS-SQL Server?

Re: [GENERAL] pg_dumpall problems

2000-08-15 Thread g
Thanks. I figured out the CAST later but didn't know the 1.1::numeric syntax. - Water overcomes the stone; Without substance it requires no opening; This is the benefit of taking no action. Lao-Tse Brian Knox Senior Systems

Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others

2000-08-15 Thread Ned Lilly
Er... let me put it this way. Proprietary 2 prefers to run on Windows NT. Chris Bitmead wrote: That's very helpful. Can you also tell us if Proprietry 1 or Proprietry 2 was definitely NOT MS-SQL Server?

Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others

2000-08-15 Thread Alfred Perlstein
Chris Bitmead wrote: That's very helpful. Can you also tell us if Proprietry 1 or Proprietry 2 was definitely NOT MS-SQL Server? * Ned Lilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000815 18:59] wrote: Er... let me put it this way. Proprietary 2 prefers to run on Windows NT. It's oracle??? j/k You have

[GENERAL] Referential integrity

2000-08-15 Thread George Robinson II
Hi again. Still new to databases, and I was wondering if I could get advice on how to set this up right. Essentially, I have a table, lets call it main, in which each row, describes another table in the database. I want to set it up so that, dropping the table will also drop the

Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others

2000-08-15 Thread Chris Bitmead
Ned Lilly wrote: Er... let me put it this way. Proprietary 2 prefers to run on Windows NT. The performance is so bad it must be MS-Access :-). Chris Bitmead wrote: That's very helpful. Can you also tell us if Proprietry 1 or Proprietry 2 was definitely NOT MS-SQL Server?

[GENERAL] Search (select) options

2000-08-15 Thread Jeff Davis
I would like to be able to use searches that seem somewhat intelligent. Can you 'ORDER BY' number of matching 'OR' clauses? For example, someone searches for "x y z", so I would do "select * from mytable where col1 like '%x%' or col1 like '%y%' or col1 like '%z%';", but I want it to order by