Hi,
since postgresql multidimensional arrays can't have different size per axis, I
was wondering what would happen in case I used an array of, say, 10x10
elements, where only 10x2 elements are filled and the rest are NULL. I guess
the NULL elements take space (and I would have 80% of the space
On 14/09/2010, at 10:37 AM, Yaroslav Tykhiy wrote:
On 14/09/2010, at 12:41 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Yaroslav Tykhiy y...@barnet.com.au writes:
[...]
I think the major problem you're having is that the planner is
completely clueless about the selectivity of the condition
On 09/20/10 12:58 AM, Leonardo Francalanci wrote:
Hi,
since postgresql multidimensional arrays can't have different size per axis,...
huh? says what?
i thought PG multidimensional arrays were just arrays of arrays, and any
dimension could be anything.
in fact, the docs for 8.4 state
i thought PG multidimensional arrays were just arrays of arrays, and any
dimension could be anything.
from:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/arrays.html
Multidimensional arrays must have matching extents for each dimension. A
mismatch causes an error
--
Sent via
On 09/20/10 1:24 AM, Leonardo Francalanci wrote:
i thought PG multidimensional arrays were just arrays of arrays, and any
dimension could be anything.
from:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/arrays.html
Multidimensional arrays must have matching extents for each dimension. A
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 05:34:54PM -0700, Bret Green wrote:
Thanks
Any solution without cursors perhaps?
write sql function as a wrapper around insert, and use it as a source
for 2nd insert.
depesz
--
Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/depesz / blog: http://www.depesz.com/
jid/gtalk:
Hey all,
There are an output of postgres in a start time:
FATAL: data directory /path/to/cluster has group or world access
DETAIL: Permissions should be u=rwx (0700).
Is there way to allow postgres starts with 0770 ?
Regards,
Dmitriy
Hey all,
There are an output of postgres process in a start time:
FATAL: data directory /path/to/cluster has group or world access
DETAIL: Permissions should be u=rwx (0700).
Is there way to allow postgres starts with 0770 ?
Regards,
Dmitriy
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 4:12 AM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 09/20/10 12:58 AM, Leonardo Francalanci wrote:
Hi,
since postgresql multidimensional arrays can't have different size per
axis,...
huh? says what?
i thought PG multidimensional arrays were just arrays of
Hi everyone,
I've run into a strange problem with system catalogs - we're collecting
database stats periodically (every 10 minutes), and from time to time we
get the following error:
--
ERROR: could not open relation with OID 154873708
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Sam Mason s...@samason.me.uk wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 04:51:46PM +0200, Willy-Bas Loos wrote:
i have a function that produces a result in xml.
that is one row, one value even, but it grows pretty large.
how is that handled?
Rows are sent back in the
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Sam Mason s...@samason.me.uk wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 04:51:46PM +0200, Willy-Bas Loos wrote:
i have a function that produces a result in xml.
that is one row, one value even,
Hello everybody,
Our Company get two Cluster environment with postgres 8.4.4 installed.
Both Clusters have the same Structure (Tables, Functions, ...)
In one of them I am recently getting many entries in the log on this type:
2010-09-20 14:21:25 CEST [31010]: [1-1] user=edarling,db=edarlingdb
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Eric Ndengang
eric.ndengang_fo...@affinitas.de wrote:
2010-09-20 14:21:51 CEST [31492]: [1-1] user=edarling,db=edarlingdb LOG:
unexpected EOF on client connection
What really strange is, is that every Application get connected through the
Database using the
Is there any other way [than SystemTap] I can attack this issue
[figuring out who sent a SIGTERM]? Attach GDB?
gdb won't tell you who sent the signal.
I don't really see any specific reason why sigmon.stp wouldn't show a SIGTERM if
one was sent.
An alternative could be to use auditd with
Rows are sent back in the entireity, so the PG instance would need
enough memory to work with that row. When you're running a 32bit
version of PG, values whose size is beyond ~100MB are a bit touch and go
whether it will work.
?? I hear that it's posible to store up to a GiB as a value for a
t...@fuzzy.cz writes:
I've run into a strange problem with system catalogs - we're collecting
database stats periodically (every 10 minutes), and from time to time we
get the following error:
--
ERROR: could not open relation with OID
Willy-Bas Loos willy...@gmail.com writes:
Rows are sent back in the entireity, so the PG instance would need
enough memory to work with that row. When you're running a 32bit
version of PG, values whose size is beyond ~100MB are a bit touch and go
whether it will work.
?? I hear that it's
Hi
Just a quick note for anyone else building 9.0 from source and experimenting
with pg_upgrade - if you get a message like the following when running the
pg_upgrade binary:
pg_upgrade_support.so must be created and installed in
/path/to/pg90/lib/postgresql/pg_upgrade_support.so
you need to
I have a table in my database and would like to modify the one column
that is already configured to be the PRIMARY KEY but I forgot to set
it for AUTO_INCREMENT. For some reason I can't find what the proper
command would be in the documentation and my commands from MySQL don't
appear to work
Rows are sent back in the entireity, so the PG instance would need
enough memory to work with that row. When you're running a 32bit
version of PG, values whose size is beyond ~100MB are a bit touch and go
whether it will work.
?? I hear that it's posible to store up to a GiB as a value for
On 20 September 2010 14:53, Carlos Mennens carlos.menn...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a table in my database and would like to modify the one column
that is already configured to be the PRIMARY KEY but I forgot to set
it for AUTO_INCREMENT. For some reason I can't find what the proper
command
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 03:37:58PM +0200, Willy-Bas Loos wrote:
Rows are sent back in the entireity, so the PG instance would need
enough memory to work with that row. When you're running a 32bit
version of PG, values whose size is beyond ~100MB are a bit touch and go
whether it will
Hi,
I can't find in the Postgresql documentation the semantics that explains the
following:
co...@ruby:~/workspace/eyedb$ psql
psql (8.4.4)
Type help for help.
colin= select to_date('731332', 'YYMMDD');
to_date
1974-02-01
(1 row)
colin=
Thanks,
Colin
On Monday 20 September 2010 7:20:29 am Colin 't Hart wrote:
Hi,
I can't find in the Postgresql documentation the semantics that explains
the following:
co...@ruby:~/workspace/eyedb$ psql
psql (8.4.4)
Type help for help.
colin= select to_date('731332', 'YYMMDD');
to_date
I must be blind, I can see the syntax but I can't see where it explains the
wrapping phenomenon that I'm seeing.
Cheers,
Colin
On 20 September 2010 16:36, Adrian Klaver adrian.kla...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday 20 September 2010 7:20:29 am Colin 't Hart wrote:
Hi,
I can't find in the
On Sep 20, 2010, at 8:06 AM, Willy-Bas Loos wrote:
Sheesh..
- why?
Because you start with 4GB of address space, immediately give up maybe 0.5GB
for mapping executable code (all the system libraries that get linked), plus a
good chunk for the main thread stack, plus library data structures.
Congrats on the 9.0 release of PostgreSQL. One of the features I am really
interested in is the built-in binary replication.
Our production environment has been using PostgreSQL for more than 5 years
(since this project started). We have been using Slony-I as our replication
mechanism. I am
Dmitriy Igrishin wrote:
Hey all,
There are an output of postgres process in a start time:
FATAL: data directory /path/to/cluster has group or world access
DETAIL: Permissions should be u=rwx (0700).
Is there way to allow postgres starts with 0770 ?
You have to modify the source code
John Cheng wrote:
Congrats on the 9.0 release of PostgreSQL. One of the features I am really
interested in is the built-in binary replication.
Our production environment has been using PostgreSQL for more than 5 years
(since this project started). We have been using Slony-I as our
Thanks Bruce!
Regards,
Dmitriy
Hey all,
I'm tossing an idea around again, namely using bit positions and values as
foreign key references. Let's start with a bit of background information:
I'm currently parsing a log-file that I want to apply all kinds of statistical
analysis to. This file contains lines of records of data,
johnlich...@gmail.com (John Cheng) writes:
Congrats on the 9.0 release of PostgreSQL. One of the features I am really
interested in is the built-in binary replication.
Our production environment has been using PostgreSQL for more than 5 years
(since this project started). We have been using
On 10-09-20 12:49 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
John Cheng wrote:
Congrats on the 9.0 release of PostgreSQL. One of the features I am really
interested in is the built-in binary replication.
Our production environment has been using PostgreSQL for more than 5 years
(since this project started). We
On Sep 20, 2010, at 10:06 AM, Alban Hertroys wrote:
Hey all,
I'm tossing an idea around again, namely using bit positions and values as
foreign key references. Let's start with a bit of background information:
I'm currently parsing a log-file that I want to apply all kinds of
I'm using the OS X precompiled binary from EnterpriseDB and want to add the
tablefunc contrib module. I haven't been able to find any documentation about
how to do this or even whether modules can be added to this binary version.
I suppose that it may be a good idea to export my databases
Aram Fingal fin...@multifactorial.com writes:
I'm using the OS X precompiled binary from EnterpriseDB and want to add the
tablefunc contrib module. I haven't been able to find any documentation
about how to do this or even whether modules can be added to this binary
version.
Most
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Aram Fingal fin...@multifactorial.com wrote:
I'm using the OS X precompiled binary from EnterpriseDB and want to add the
tablefunc contrib module. I haven't been able to find any documentation
about how to do this or even whether modules can be added to this
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
CREATE SEQUENCE seq_blades_id;
SELECT setval('seq_blades_id', max(id)) FROM blades; -- set the
sequence's value to the maximum value of id
ALTER TABLE blades ALTER COLUMN id SET DEFAULT
nextval('seq_blades_id'); -- make
Ian Barwick wrote:
Hi
Just a quick note for anyone else building 9.0 from source and experimenting
with pg_upgrade - if you get a message like the following when running the
pg_upgrade binary:
pg_upgrade_support.so must be created and installed in
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Ian Barwick wrote:
Hi
Just a quick note for anyone else building 9.0 from source and experimenting
with pg_upgrade - if you get a message like the following when running the
pg_upgrade binary:
pg_upgrade_support.so must be created and installed in
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 2:43 PM, A.M. age...@themactionfaction.com wrote:
DEFAULT
Sorry just to be clear you're saying that I need to enter the command as:
INSERT INTO table_name DEFAULT VALUES (
'data',
'data',
'data',
'data',
'2010-09-20'
);
Or does the 'DEFAULT' value go in ( )?
--
Sent
On 20 September 2010 19:40, Carlos Mennens carlos.menn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
CREATE SEQUENCE seq_blades_id;
SELECT setval('seq_blades_id', max(id)) FROM blades; -- set the
sequence's value to the maximum value of id
ALTER TABLE
On 09/20/2010 11:40 AM, Carlos Mennens wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Thom Brownt...@linux.com wrote:
CREATE SEQUENCE seq_blades_id;
SELECT setval('seq_blades_id', max(id)) FROM blades; -- set the
sequence's value to the maximum value of id
ALTER TABLE blades ALTER COLUMN id SET
On 20 September 2010 19:54, Carlos Mennens carlos.menn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 2:43 PM, A.M. age...@themactionfaction.com wrote:
DEFAULT
Sorry just to be clear you're saying that I need to enter the command as:
INSERT INTO table_name DEFAULT VALUES (
'data',
'data',
On 09/20/2010 07:50 AM, Colin 't Hart wrote:
I must be blind, I can see the syntax but I can't see where it explains
the wrapping phenomenon that I'm seeing.
Cheers,
Colin
My turn to be blind, what wrapping ? :)
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.kla...@gmail.com
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing
Thanks all! I understand the concept now.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
The 32nd of Undecember (!) turning into the 1st of February of the
next year... instead of throwing an exception like I expect.
On 20 September 2010 21:02, Adrian Klaver adrian.kla...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/20/2010 07:50 AM, Colin 't Hart wrote:
I must be blind, I can see the syntax but I
Hi guys,
I'm trying to merge two tables to one with INSERT and SELECT commands:
INSERT into c_transactions (timestamp) SELECT entrytimestamp from c_transactions
INSERT into c_transactions (timestamp) SELECT exittimestamp from c_transactions
But getting this error on execution (in pgAdmin):
On Sep 20, 2010, at 2:12 PM, Dave Page wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Aram Fingal fin...@multifactorial.com
wrote:
I'm using the OS X precompiled binary from EnterpriseDB and want to add the
tablefunc contrib module. I haven't been able to find any documentation
about how to do
Colin 't Hart colinth...@gmail.com writes:
The 32nd of Undecember (!) turning into the 1st of February of the
next year... instead of throwing an exception like I expect.
As mentioned previously, to_date isn't the tool to use if you want
a strict conversion --- it's designed to be rather, um,
On 20/09/10 20:18, Colin 't Hart wrote:
The 32nd of Undecember (!) turning into the 1st of February of the
next year... instead of throwing an exception like I expect.
What Tom said, but it's presumably using mktime(...) somewhere internally.
perl -MPOSIX -e 'print scalar
Hey Stefan,
The sounds like you have a field id in you c_transactions without
default value (which usually should be nextval('some_sequence'::regclass).
Do you create a sequence for c_transactions.id ?
--
Regards,
Dmitriy
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Aram Fingal fin...@multifactorial.com wrote:
So that means something like:
psql -d dbname -f
/Library/PostgreSQL/8.4/share/postgresql/contrib/tablefunc.sql
Yup.
I suppose that I will have to export and re-import the databases when I
upgrade?
Hmm, yes -
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Tatsuo Ishii is...@sraoss.co.jp wrote:
Sorry for delay. I had a trip outside Japan.
No problem.
I found nasty bug with pgpool. Please try attached patches.
I tried the patch file and I still cannot connect. The only other
difference is that I've already
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 20 September 2010 14:53, Carlos Mennens carlos.menn...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a table in my database and would like to modify the one column
that is already configured to be the PRIMARY KEY but I forgot to set
it for
On 20 September 2010 20:58, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 20 September 2010 14:53, Carlos Mennens carlos.menn...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a table in my database and would like to modify the one column
that is
Thanks, Bruce!
2010/9/20 Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us
Dmitriy Igrishin wrote:
Hey all,
There are an output of postgres process in a start time:
FATAL: data directory /path/to/cluster has group or world access
DETAIL: Permissions should be u=rwx (0700).
Is there way to allow
Dne 20.9.2010 15:44, Tom Lane napsal(a):
t...@fuzzy.cz writes:
I've run into a strange problem with system catalogs - we're collecting
database stats periodically (every 10 minutes), and from time to time we
get the following error:
--
ERROR:
I tried the patch file and I still cannot connect. The only other
difference is that I've already upgraded our images to Postgres 9.0.0 from
rc1.
Here is the pgpool debug log:
2010-09-20 19:43:19 DEBUG: pid 1329: I am 1329 accept fd 6
2010-09-20 19:43:19 LOG: pid 1329: connection
Tomas Vondra t...@fuzzy.cz writes:
Dne 20.9.2010 15:44, Tom Lane napsal(a):
I think you're probably hitting a problem with a table being deleted
while you're scanning pg_class. pg_relation_size() will fail if the
given OID isn't valid now --- but the underlying query returns all
OIDs that
Much thanks to everyone! The mailing list, as usual, has been extremely
helpful.
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Brad Nicholson
bnich...@ca.afilias.infowrote:
On 10-09-20 12:49 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
John Cheng wrote:
Congrats on the 9.0 release of PostgreSQL. One of the features I am
On 20/09/2010 10:56 PM, Scott Ribe wrote:
- should this be documented?
Doubtful. It has to do with very well known limits of 32-bit programs, applies
to any use for a 1GB block regardless of where it comes from (network or disk),
really has nothing to do with postgres, and the actual size
63 matches
Mail list logo
