Hi,
I have a small question about the site of PostgreSQL source.
http://www.postgresql.org/ftp/source/
Now I can see some directories of PostgreSQL 9.2beta1/2.
- v9.2.0beta1
- v9.2.0beta2
- v9.2beta1
- v9.2beta2
It seems to be pointed the same direcotory with each version.
-
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Andreas Kretschmer akretsch...@spamfence.net writes:
production=*# explain analyse select * from boxes;
QUERY PLAN
Now, when I launch a query which includes crosstab() as a postgres user,
everything works fine. However, if I launch it as user XXX, it complaints:
Are you schema qualifying the function name when you use it?
If not, does user XXX have schema tablefunc in their search_path?
Also, does
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Tatsuo Ishii is...@postgresql.org wrote:
Hi,
I have a small question about the site of PostgreSQL source.
http://www.postgresql.org/ftp/source/
Now I can see some directories of PostgreSQL 9.2beta1/2.
- v9.2.0beta1
- v9.2.0beta2
- v9.2beta1
- v9.2beta2
On 07/04/2012 11:20 PM, Stefan Schwarzer wrote:
Now, when I launch a query which includes crosstab() as a postgres user,
everything works fine. However, if I launch it as user XXX, it complaints:
Are you schema qualifying the function name when you use it?
If not, does user XXX have schema
Now, when I launch a query which includes crosstab() as a postgres
user, everything works fine. However, if I launch it as user XXX, it
complaints:
Are you schema qualifying the function name when you use it?
If not, does user XXX have schema tablefunc in their search_path?
Also, does
Stefan Schwarzer stefan.schwar...@unep.org writes:
Ahh
. Indeed, no tablefunc schema in there.
If the textual value of search_path (as per show search_path) lists
the schema but current_schemas() doesn't, I have to think that you've
got a permissions problem --- the system will silently ignore
On 07/05/2012 07:46 AM, Stefan Schwarzer wrote:
Now, when I launch a query which includes crosstab() as a postgres user,
everything works fine. However, if I launch it as user XXX, it complaints:
The search path is indicated as:
$user, public, metadata, admin, gis, tablefunc,
Per Toms suggestion you need to check the permissions on the schema.
One way to do that is, from psql type the following and enter:
\dn+
One other thing you might want to verify: Does user XXX have the
PUBLIC schema in their search_path? It is by default, but some people
take it out for
Is it possible to cancel a pg_ctl stop if some clients remain
connected and there is no longer a need to stop the DB?
--
Andy Chambers
Software Engineer
(e) achamb...@mcna.net
(t) 954-682-0573
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail may contain information
that is privileged, confidential,
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Andy Chambers achamb...@mcna.net wrote:
Is it possible to cancel a pg_ctl stop if some clients remain
connected and there is no longer a need to stop the DB?
Nope. Once started it can't be cancelled.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work:
In poking about Amazon's PostgreSQL titles recently, I found two that I had
not seen before:
PostgreSQL 9 Administration Cookbook LITE: Configuration, Monitoring,
Maintenance:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1849516421/ref=ox_sc_act_title_7?ie=UTF8m=ATVPDKIKX0DER
PostgreSQL Administration
Hi,
I'm having trouble with WAL files. Every 4th WAL file written by the server
into pg_xlog is 24576 bytes instead of 16MB. A short WAL causes a fatal
error during recovery.
This behavior is perfectly consistent. For example, if archive_timeout is 5
mins, every 20 minutes the new WAL file is
On Jul 5, 2012, at 2:09 PM, James Hartley wrote:
By scouring the table of contents, it appears that these newer LITE
editions are subsets of the older volume. It does not appear that there is
any new material in these newer offerings.
I am *very* much a fan of Simon Riggs' 2010 work
Hi all,
I have a query which is being optimized very differently depending on whether
it is written using an OR clause or a UNION clause.
I believe that the query results should be the same, and even if I've missed
something with regards to something small (e.g. NULL handling) I do not believe
beamsplit...@gmail.com writes:
I'm having trouble with WAL files. Every 4th WAL file written by the server
into pg_xlog is 24576 bytes instead of 16MB. A short WAL causes a fatal
error during recovery.
Hm. It's fairly hard to see how you could get into such a state to
start with, but once
Steven Schlansker ste...@likeness.com writes:
Why is using an OR so awful here?
Because the OR stops it from being a join (it possibly needs to return
some rows that are not in the semijoin of the two tables).
Why does it pick a sequential scan? Is this an optimizer bug
No. It can't
On 5 July 2012 22:09, James Hartley jjhart...@gmail.com wrote:
Although the titles are *very* similar, these don't appear to be the same,
however, they do resemble the information found in the lengthier 2010 tome
(which I already have...):
The LITE books are subsets of the main book. They're
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I think Packt were experimenting with a kind of pocket book format,
so I'm sure they'd welcome your feedback on how well that works. I'm
not sure there was any intention for people to buy both.
Thanks to both of you for
On Jul 5, 2012, at 3:51 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Steven Schlansker ste...@likeness.com writes:
Why is using an OR so awful here?
Because the OR stops it from being a join (it possibly needs to return
some rows that are not in the semijoin of the two tables).
Why does it pick a sequential
For reasons I've brought up before
(http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2012-06/msg00174.php), I
need to stop some of my extension tables from dumping data when a
schema only dump is done because they have the potential to contain A
LOT of data.
For reference my extension is
I note you've decided to rewrite this query as a union
SELECT * FROM account
WHERE user_id in
(SELECT user_id FROM account
WHERE id =
ANY('{-02f6-379d-c000-00026810,-0320-b467-c000-00026810,-000d-cefb-c000-00026810}'))
OR
id =
On 07/06/2012 09:33 AM, Samuel Gendler wrote:
Some other potential issues - with only 10MB of work_mem, you might be
gong to temp space on disk more than you realize. Explain analyze
might reveal that, but only if you happen to pick a query that exceeds
work_mem on at least one step.
Rather
Dear list,
I have an existing PostgreSQL DB and I would like to draw a model of the DB
structure. Is there some software (Freeware) around that can read the
existing structure of my DB and automatically draw e.g. an ER-model of that?
The software that I have found so far (e.g. Open System
Dear list,
I have an existing PostgreSQL DB and I would like to draw a model of the DB
structure. Is there some software (Freeware) around that can read the
existing structure of my DB and automatically draw e.g. an ER-model of that?
The software that I have found so far (e.g. Open System
On 07/06/2012 11:13 AM, ssylla wrote:
Dear list,
I have an existing PostgreSQL DB and I would like to draw a model of the DB
structure. Is there some software (Freeware) around that can read the
existing structure of my DB and automatically draw e.g. an ER-model of that?
I use and like
26 matches
Mail list logo
