Hi,
I am running PostgreSQL 9.3.4. I have a simple table with 3 fields:
CREATE TABLE devicegroup (
groupid integer NOT NULL,
ctrlid integer NOT NULL,
userid integer NOT NULL
);
ALTER TABLE ONLY devicegroup
ADD CONSTRAINT pk_devicegroup PRIMARY KEY (groupid, ctrlid, userid);
statement.
Leif
- Original Message -
> Leif Jensen wrote:
> >If I do "DELETE FROM devicegroup WHERE group=1" I do not want to delete
> >anything. I only want to
> > delete if I do "DELETE FROM devicegroup WHERE groupid=x AND ctrlid=y AND
> &g
> > -Original Message-
> > From: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org
> > [mailto:pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Leif Jensen
> > Sent: Freitag, 18. September 2015 10:23
> > To: pgsql-general <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
> > Subject: [GENER
Hi Ioana and David.
Thank you. Yes, I can see the problem. I will look into your suggestions.
Leif
- Original Message -
> On Friday, September 18, 2015, Leif Jensen <l...@crysberg.dk> wrote:
>
> >Hello Laurenz,
> >
> >Thank you for you sugg
Hello Tom, Adrian
Thank you for your help and the patch. Things works nicely for me now :-).
Leif
- Original Message -
Adrian Klaver adrian.kla...@aklaver.com writes:
On 05/08/2014 07:19 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
9.3 patch is here:
Hi Tom,
I already compiled postgreSQL myself and now using 9.3.4, so I would very
much like a patch. Where can I find that ?
Leif
- Original Message -
Leif Jensen l...@crysberg.dk writes:
Could it be related to the OFFSET part of the statement ? I have
another query
of the
ApplDBConn_22854_f6adeb70_query, which has been used many many times before the
log shown (167 in all to be exact ;-) ).
Leif
- Original Message -
On 05/06/2014 07:08 AM, Leif Jensen wrote:
Hello.
I was running PostgreSQL 9.1.4 when I got a server process crash
Could it be related to the OFFSET part of the statement ? I have another
query on the same table without OFFSET, which seems to work fine.
Leif
- Original Message -
Leif Jensen l...@crysberg.dk writes:
Here is a gdb dump of the backtrace at the server process crash.
I
Hello.
I was running PostgreSQL 9.1.4 when I got a server process crash
(Segmentation fault) as the postgres log shown below. I tried upgrade to newest
version 9.3.4, but this gives exactly the same problem.
It is an (ecpg based) C-program that does tons of these scroll cursor
Hi guys.
In the ECPG manual (including latest 9.1.9) about ECPG SQL SET CONNECTION
connection name; it is stated that This is not thread-aware.
When looking in the ecpg library code connect.c for ECPGsetconn( ... ), it
looks very much like it is thread-aware if translated with the
Hello.
We have a system that has been running using PostgreSQL 8.4. We have now
upgraded to PostgreSQL 9.1. The system has several rules on views and now most
of these does not seem to work anymore. It is rather simple rules with mainly
only 1 replacement sql (update for 'on update' and
for the
parameter type. Could you please expand a little on your example ?
Leif
- Jasen Betts ja...@xnet.co.nz wrote:
On 2013-01-18, Leif Jensen l...@crysberg.dk wrote:
I have been fighting a problem with an update rule on a view. I
have a view that combines two tables where
Hi Marc,
Thanks a lot. That works fine. The names 'NEW' and 'OLD' works fine.
Leif
- Marc Schablewski m...@clickware.de wrote:
Hi Leif,
Am 22.01.2013 14:34, schrieb Leif Jensen:
CREATE update_rule_func( old record, new record ) AS ... I am told,
that I cannot use record
Hello,
I have been fighting a problem with an update rule on a view. I have a view
that combines two tables where the 'sub' table (scont) can have several rows
per row in the 'top' table (icont). The view combines these to show only one
record per row in the top table. To be able to
connection for the
ALLOCATE DESCRIPTOR statement even though it allows it ?
Please help,
Leif
- Bosco Rama postg...@boscorama.com wrote:
Leif Jensen wrote:
Is it really not possible to use 2 separate connection within 1
thread
at the same time ? or is it an error in the ecpg library
PS.: That goes for the AT clause on the GET DESCRIPTOR statement too. The
connection name is not included in the ECPGget_desc() call.
- Leif Jensen l...@crysberg.dk wrote:
Hello Bosco,
Thank you for your comment. Yes, it would be nice to get some more
comments on the allocate
:
Leif Jensen wrote:
This seems to be working most of the time, but looking at the
generated C
code from the ecpg compiler and the associated library functions, we
are
not sure whether we should put mutex locks around the 'select' part
to
avoid several threads are using the same
Hello Guys,
In a multi-threaded server program using Postgresql 8.3.5 with ECPG
interface for C, we have problems using descriptors (and possibly cursors).
We have created a common database interface module with basically 1
function: SQLExec(). In the 'select' part of this function
Hi guys,
In version 8.2 of the ECPG documentation, section 31.6.3. Different types
of host variables has been added and includes the following (new) note:
'Note that you have to take care of the length for yourself. If you use this
host variable as the target variable of a query which
Hi guys,
I have a rather complex view that sometimes takes an awful long time to
execute. I have tried to do an 'explain analyze' on it. My intention was to try
to optimize the tables involved by creating some indexes to help the lookup. I
looked for the Seq Scan's and created
Hello guys,
PostgreSQL 8.3.5. Compiled and installed on Slackware 10.2, kernel 2.6.15.
We have a transaction based system that creates a new process every time a
user connects (just fork()s, no exec()s). Each of these processes has several
threads. Some database connections are
Hej Guys,
I'm looking for design ideas (and implementation specifics, not just
tutorials) to a transaction heavy multi-process, multi-threaded system using
PostgreSQL. Are there some good references to existing open source systems for
me to see how other people has solved that kind of
Hi guys,
I have an ECPG based program and I would very much like to get either the
process id of the backend or the session id for debugging purposes. Is there a
way to call PQbackendPID() directly from my program (I suppose that will
require getting hold of the PGconn from within ECPG?)
Hi Guys,
I'm trying to set up a warm standby server, but have problems with running
it on the backup. I feel that I have done like the documentation says:
The WAL is being copied to the slave using rsync.
Doing SELECT pg_start_backup(); (in psql)
Copying the data directory to the
(linux) box ?
Leif
- Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Leif Jensen l...@crysberg.dk writes:
So far I don't get any errors, but when I start postgres on the
slave (I'm using pg_ctl), I get the error 'FATAL: incorrect checksum
in control file'.
Both servers are running PostgreSQL
That is almost too simple ;-)
Thanks for the suggestion,
Leif
- Christopher Browne cbbro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Leif Jensen l...@crysberg.dk
wrote:
You are perfectly right, master is 32bit and slave is 64bit. I
didn't even consider
.)
As a workaround we close the database and reopen it when we get this error.
Is this a normal/bug situation ?
Any suggestions will be most welcome,
Leif
- Original Message -
From: Leif Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Leif Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 9:44:27 AM GMT +01
Hi Guys,
We have a system with a multithreaded daemon running on Linux using
PostgreSQL 8.2.4 Embedded SQL in C. Most of the threads are doing database
access and they have each their own conection which is opened when the
thread is created (as one of the first things within the thread).
Hello,
I have with great interrest been following this thread. We have a
(small) flame war in house about this and I'm very happy about all the
arguments I have seen. I'm a long time user of PostgreSQL (which possibly
makes me a bit biased ;-) ) and I think it's great. I'm not a big
Hi all,
I have been using PostgreSQL for many years now and have never had any
problems downloading it. The last one I got hold of is 8.0.3, but now when
I try to get 8.1.2, I can get nothing to work.
I am behind a rather strict firewall, it has been like this for years.
I checked
Hi all,
Anyone using the CMS called Mambo with PostgreSQL ?
Leif
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
, 20 Nov 2005, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Leif Jensen wrote:
Anyone using the CMS called Mambo with PostgreSQL ?
Yes.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0
Hi All,
I have been using PostgreSQL ever since version 6.3 and are very happy
about it. Many of our company corporate registration systems are based on
PostgreSQL and are web based using PHP.
Unfortunately someone has decided that our (external) homepage(s) are
gonna use the Mambo CMS
Hi all,
I am trying to make a stored procedure in C that is used as a trigger
on before/after insert/update on a certain table. This procedure might do
inserts/updates on the same table (recursively triggering itself). I have
made (pretty) sure that I'm not using 'global' variables in
Oops, I forgot to say that I have tried PostgreSQL 7.4.1, 7.4.6, and
7.4.7 all with the same result. I'm running this on a Linux (Slackware
10.0), kernel 2.6.10y.
Leif
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Leif Jensen wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to make a stored procedure in C that is used
Jul 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
Leif Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am trying to make a stored procedure in C that is used as a trigger
on before/after insert/update on a certain table. This procedure might do
inserts/updates on the same table (recursively triggering itself). I have
made
Hi again,
Thanks. No changes on this 7.x.x - 8.x.x ?
.. and just to be sure: SPI_exec does the SPI_push/SPI_pop thing too ?
Leif
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
Leif Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thank you for the suggestions. I didn't know anything about SPI_push
need to use rules to do update/insert on tasks, how can I make it
'transparent' as in the above example (the update that does nothing) ?
Greetings,
Leif
On Tue, 17 May 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
Leif Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
CREATE RULE update_tasks2taskshead AS
ON UPDATE TO tasks
Hello,
I have been working with a great database system called PostgreSQL for
many years ;-) but never had to use any RULEs. I now have to use and
update through a view and have written a few rules to make this possible
as per the manual.
My insert rules seems to work fine, but I
39 matches
Mail list logo
