Em seg., 4 de mar. de 2024 às 20:28, Tom Lane escreveu:
> Michael Paquier writes:
> > On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 03:08:03PM -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> >> I can't see any user validation at the function
> pg_newlocale_from_collation.
>
> > Matthias is right, look closer. I can see more than one
Michael Paquier writes:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 03:08:03PM -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote:
>> I can't see any user validation at the function pg_newlocale_from_collation.
> Matthias is right, look closer. I can see more than one check,
> especially note the one related to the collation version
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 03:08:03PM -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> I can't see any user validation at the function pg_newlocale_from_collation.
Matthias is right, look closer. I can see more than one check,
especially note the one related to the collation version mismatch that
should not be
Em seg., 4 de mar. de 2024 às 14:54, Matthias van de Meent <
boekewurm+postg...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 18:39, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The function var_strcmp is a critical function.
> > Inside the function, there is a shortcut condition,
> > which allows
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 18:39, Ranier Vilela wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The function var_strcmp is a critical function.
> Inside the function, there is a shortcut condition,
> which allows for a quick exit.
>
> Unfortunately, the current code calls a very expensive function beforehand,
> which if the test
Hi,
The function var_strcmp is a critical function.
Inside the function, there is a shortcut condition,
which allows for a quick exit.
Unfortunately, the current code calls a very expensive function beforehand,
which if the test was true, all the call time is wasted.
So, IMO, it's better to
