Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-04-05 Thread Imseih (AWS), Sami
> The original \conninfo was designed to report values from the libpq API > about what libpq connected to. And the convention in psql is that "+" > provide more or less the same information but a bit more. So I think it > is wrong to make "\conninfo+" something fundamentally different than >

Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-04-05 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 04.04.24 18:15, Maiquel Grassi wrote: Well, I can revert \conninfo to its original state and keep \conninfo+ as it is, perhaps removing the application name, as I believe everything else is important for a DBA/SysAdmin. Do you think we can proceed with the patch this way? I am open to ideas

Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-04-04 Thread Imseih (AWS), Sami
> The point about application_name is a valid one. I guess it's there > because it's commonly given from the client side rather than being set >server-side, even though it's still a GUC. Arguably we could remove it > from \conninfo+, and claim that nothing that shows up in \dconfig should > also

Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-04-04 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On 2024-Apr-04, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > But I don't really see the point of this. The information you are querying > is already available in various system views. This proposal is just a > shorthand for a collection of various random things some people like to see. > Like, by what reason is

RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-04-04 Thread Maiquel Grassi
Hi! (v29) I left the command \conninfo in its original form. I removed the 'Application Name' column from the \conninfo+ command. Thanks, Maiquel Grassi. v29-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch Description: v29-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch

RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-04-04 Thread Maiquel Grassi
>> The existing \conninfo command gets its values from libpq APIs. You are >> changing all of this to make a server query, which is a totally >> different thing. If we wanted to take a change like this, I don't think >> it should be reusing the \conninfo command. FWIW, I agree with Peter's

Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-04-04 Thread Tom Lane
Maiquel Grassi writes: >> The existing \conninfo command gets its values from libpq APIs. You are >> changing all of this to make a server query, which is a totally >> different thing. If we wanted to take a change like this, I don't think >> it should be reusing the \conninfo command. FWIW, I

RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-04-04 Thread Maiquel Grassi
The existing \conninfo command gets its values from libpq APIs. You are changing all of this to make a server query, which is a totally different thing. If we wanted to take a change like this, I don't think it should be reusing the \conninfo command. But I don't really see the point of this.

Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-04-04 Thread Peter Eisentraut
The existing \conninfo command gets its values from libpq APIs. You are changing all of this to make a server query, which is a totally different thing. If we wanted to take a change like this, I don't think it should be reusing the \conninfo command. But I don't really see the point of

RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-04-04 Thread Maiquel Grassi
| SSL Cipher | SSL Compression | GSSAPI Authenticated | f GSSAPI Principal | GSSAPI Encrypted | f GSSAPI Credentials Delegated | f Regards, Maiquel Grassi. v28-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch Description: v28-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch

RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-04-04 Thread Maiquel Grassi
context; see the current_user() function in for more details. ---//--- Hi Sami! (v27) I made the adjustment in the documentation. Thank you for the time dedicated to this feature. Regards, Maiquel Grassi. v27-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo

Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-04-03 Thread Imseih (AWS), Sami
Building the docs fail for v26. The error is: ref/psql-ref.sgml:1042: element member: validity error : Element term is not declared in member list of possible children ^ I am able to build up to v24 before the was replaced with I tested building with a

RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-04-03 Thread Maiquel Grassi
t; for more details. I updated the patch. Thank you for this help. Regards, Maiquel Grassi. v26-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch Description: v26-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch

Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-04-01 Thread Imseih (AWS), Sami
> Here I considered your suggestion (Sami and Álvaro's). However, I haven't yet > added the links for the functions system_user(), current_user(), and > session_user(). > 'm not sure how to do it. Any suggestion on how to create/add the link? Here is an example [1] where the session information

RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-04-01 Thread Maiquel Grassi
function is not > great. Here I considered your suggestion (Sami and Álvaro's). However, I haven't yet added the links for the functions system_user(), current_user(), and session_user(). I'm not sure how to do it. Any suggestion on how to create/add the link? Regards, Maiquel Grassi. v25-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch Description: v25-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch

RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-04-01 Thread Maiquel Grassi
Database: The database name of the connection. Authenticated User: The authenticated database user of the connection. Socket Directory: The Unix socket directory of the connection. NULL if host or hostaddr are specified. Host: The host name or address of the connection. NULL if a

Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-04-01 Thread Imseih (AWS), Sami
> That minor point aside, I disagree with Sami about repeating the docs > for system_user() here. I would just say "The authentication data > provided for this connection; see the function system_user() for more > details." +1. FWIW; Up the thread [1], I did mention we should link to the

Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-04-01 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Hello Yeah, that's what I meant about the translations, thanks. Two more comments, - You don't need a two-level conditional here if (pset.sversion >= 90500) { if (pset.sversion < 14) appendPQExpBuffer(,

RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-04-01 Thread Maiquel Grassi
Hi! (v24) > I meant those columns to be just examples, but this should be applied to > all the other columns in the output as well. Applied the translation to all columns. Regards, Maiquel Grassi. v24-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch Description: v24-0001-psql-meta-command-co

Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-04-01 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On 2024-Mar-31, Maiquel Grassi wrote: > Yes Álvaro, I have already appointed you as the patch reviewer. > It's true, even before publishing it on Commifest, you have > already provided good ideas and guidance. Thanks. > I adjusted the translation syntax for the SSL and GSSAPI columns. > After

Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-03-31 Thread Imseih (AWS), Sami
>. However, > I didn't complete item 4. I'm not sure, but I believe that linking it to the > documentation > could confuse the user a bit. I chose to keep the descriptions as they were. > However, if > you have any ideas on how we could outline it, let me know and perhaps we can > implement it.

RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-03-31 Thread Maiquel Grassi
PID | 1693 System User | Current User | postgres Session User | postgres Application Name | psql SSL Connection | f SSL Protocol | SSL Cipher | SSL Compression | GSSAPI Authenticated | f GSSAPI Principal | GSSAPI Encrypted | f GSSAPI Credentials Delegated | f Regards, Maiquel Grassi. v23-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch Description: v23-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch

Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-03-30 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Hello, Note that, in the patch as posted, the column names are not translatable. In order to be translatable, the code needs to do something like appendPQExpBuffer(, " NULL AS \"%s\",\n" " NULL AS \"%s\",\n" " NULL AS \"%s\",\n"

RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-03-30 Thread Maiquel Grassi
n Name | psql SSL Connection | f SSL Protocol | SSL Cipher | SSL Compression | GSSAPI Authenticated | f GSSAPI Principal | GSSAPI Encrypted | f GSSAPI Credentials Delegated | Regards, Maiquel Grassi. v22-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch Description: v22-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch

Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-03-29 Thread Imseih (AWS), Sami
Thank you for the updated patch. First and foremost, thank you very much for the review. > The initial and central idea was always to keep the metacommand > "\conninfo" in its original state, that is, to preserve the string as it is. > The idea of "\conninfo+" is to expand this to include more

RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-03-28 Thread Maiquel Grassi
| f SSL Protocol | SSL Cipher | SSL Compression | GSSAPI Authenticated | f GSSAPI Principal | GSSAPI Encrypted | f GSSAPI Credentials Delegated | f Regards, Maiquel Grassi. v21-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch Description: v21-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch

Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-03-27 Thread Imseih (AWS), Sami
Hi, Thanks for working on this. I have a few comments about the current patch. 1/ I looked through other psql-meta commands and the “+” adds details but does not change output format. In this patch, conninfo and conninfo+ have completely different output. The former is a string with all the

RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-03-27 Thread Maiquel Grassi
> Hi Nathan! > > Sorry for the delay, I was busy with other professional as well as personal > activities. > I made all the changes you suggested. I removed the variables and started > using > views "pg_stat_ssl" and "pg_stat_gssapi". I handled the PostgreSQL versioning > regarding the views

RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-03-18 Thread Maiquel Grassi
ID| 29007 Server Address | Server Port| 5433 Client Address | Client Port | Socket Directory | /tmp Host | GSSAPI | f SSL Connection | f SSL Protocol | SSL Cipher | SSL Compression| Rergards, Maiquel Grassi. v20-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch Description: v20-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch

Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-03-14 Thread Nathan Bossart
Hi Maiquel, On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 10:02:21PM +, Maiquel Grassi wrote: > Sorry for the delay. I will make the adjustments as requested soon. We have only a few weeks left before feature-freeze for v17. Do you think you will be able to send an updated patch soon? -- Nathan Bossart Amazon

Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-29 Thread Nathan Bossart
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 10:02:21PM +, Maiquel Grassi wrote: > Sorry for the delay. I will make the adjustments as requested soon. Looking forward to it. -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-29 Thread Maiquel Grassi
On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 02:53:43PM +, Maiquel Grassi wrote: >> The "pg_stat_ssl" view is available from >= PG 9.5, and the "pg_stat_gssapi" >> view is >> available from >= PG 12. The "compression" column was removed from the >> "pg_stat_ssl" from >= PG 14. All of these cases introduce greater

Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-24 Thread Nathan Bossart
On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 02:53:43PM +, Maiquel Grassi wrote: > The "pg_stat_ssl" view is available from >= PG 9.5, and the "pg_stat_gssapi" > view is > available from >= PG 12. The "compression" column was removed from the > "pg_stat_ssl" from >= PG 14. All of these cases introduce greater

RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-21 Thread Maiquel Grassi
Grassi. v19-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch Description: v19-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch

RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-17 Thread Maiquel Grassi
s | 127.0.0.1 Server Port| 5433 Client Address | 127.0.0.1 Client Port| 36016 Socket Directory | Host | 127.0.0.1 SSL Connection | t SSL Protocol | TLSv1.2 SSL Cipher | ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 SSL Compression| off GSSAPI | f Thank you very much for your sugestions and help! Maiquel Grassi. v18-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch Description: v18-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch

RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-16 Thread Maiquel Grassi
the existing previous ideas from the documentation, I've created a provisional prototype of the column descriptions. At a later stage, I'll place the descriptions correctly by removing placeholders (blah blah blah). Along with this, I'll evaluate an iteration suggested by Nathan Bossart, who also proposed changes. Thank you for your work. Regards, Maiquel Grassi. v17-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch Description: v17-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch

Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-16 Thread Nathan Bossart
Thanks for your work on this. I haven't been keeping up with the discussion, but I took a quick look at the latest patch. + +"Database", "Authenticated User", "System User" (only for PostgreSQL 16 or higher), +"Current User", "Session User", "Backend PID", "Server

Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-16 Thread Jim Jones
On 15.02.24 23:16, Maiquel Grassi wrote: > > Hi! > > (v16) > > In this version, I made a small adjustment to the indentation > of the \conninfo code and described the columns as returned > by \conninfo+ as suggested by Jim Jones. > > I've performed the following tests with v16: 1)

RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-15 Thread Maiquel Grassi
Hi! (v16) In this version, I made a small adjustment to the indentation of the \conninfo code and described the columns as returned by \conninfo+ as suggested by Jim Jones. Regards, Maiquel Grassi. v16-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch Description: v16-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo

RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-15 Thread Maiquel Grassi
a table. >Perhaps briefly mentioning the returned columns or simply listing them >would be IMHO a nice addition. For some users the semantics of >"Authenticated User", "System User", "Current User" and "Session User" >can be a little confusing. And yes, I realize the current documentation >of \conninfo is already a little vague :). Your suggestion was well received, and I'will made the adjustment to make the command description more comprehensive. Here is version v15 where I sought to correct 'Adress' to make it the same as 'Server Address'. Could you perform the same test and validate? Thank you so much! Maiquel Grassi. v15-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch Description: v15-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch

Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-14 Thread Jim Jones
On 12.02.24 15:16, Maiquel Grassi wrote: > > (v14) > > v14 applies cleanly and the SSL info is now shown as previously suggested. Here is a more comprehensive test: $ /usr/local/postgres-dev/bin/psql -x "\     host=server.uni-muenster.de     hostaddr=172.19.42.1     user=jim dbname=postgres    

Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-12 Thread Pavel Luzanov
Hi, On 12.02.2024 17:16, Maiquel Grassi wrote: The "if (db == NULL)" has been removed, as well as the message inside it. To always maintain the same error messages, I changed the validation of "\conninfo" to match the validation used for "\conninfo+". Therefore, now "\conninfo" and

RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-12 Thread Maiquel Grassi
Port| Socket Directory | /tmp Host | postgres=# \conninfo FATAL: terminating connection due to administrator command server closed the connection unexpectedly This probably means the server terminated abnormally before or while processing the request. The connection to the server was lost. Attempting reset: Succeeded. In both cases, the sessions were terminated by another session. Regards, Maiquel Grassi. v14-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch Description: v14-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch

RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-10 Thread Maiquel Grassi
stgres Backend PID| 15811 Server Address | ::1 Server Port| 5433 Client Address | ::1 Client Port| 40622 Socket Directory | Host | localhost Encryption | SSL Protocol | TLSv1.2 Cipher | ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 Compression| off Regards, Maiquel Grassi. v13-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch Description: v13-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch

RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-09 Thread Maiquel Grassi
>Hmm, I noticed that this would call printSSLInfo() and printGSSInfo() >after listConnectionInformation. It would be much better to show these >in tabular format as well and remove the calls to printSSL/GSSInfo. > >I propose additional columns to the same \conninfo+ table; when SSL, >like this: >

Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-09 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Hmm, I noticed that this would call printSSLInfo() and printGSSInfo() after listConnectionInformation. It would be much better to show these in tabular format as well and remove the calls to printSSL/GSSInfo. I propose additional columns to the same \conninfo+ table; when SSL, like this:

RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-09 Thread Maiquel Grassi
>Hi Nathan > >On 09.02.24 03:41, Nathan Bossart wrote: > >> Separately, does >> the server version really belong here? I'm not sure I would consider that >> to be connection information. >> >I tend to agree with you. The info there wouldn't hurt, but perhaps the >client version would be a better

RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-09 Thread Maiquel Grassi
Here it seems like we have an issue to be studied and subsequently resolved. >Another surprise is that this check: if (db == NULL) did not work in both >cases. I will investigate further and, if necessary, remove it. Here's v12, in the next version, I'll try to address the above situation. Thanks a lot! Maiquel Grassi. v12-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch Description: v12-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch

RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-09 Thread Maiquel Grassi
elieve something like "ssl_gss_info.h" and "ssl_gss_info.c". I'm not sure, but at first glance, this is what occurs to me. Do you have any better or more concise suggestions for resolving this? Regards, Maiquel Grassi. v11-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch Description: v11-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch v11-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch Description: v11-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch

Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-08 Thread Pavel Luzanov
Hi, Maiquel! The patch v10 build ends with a warning: $ make -j --silent describe.c:911:1: warning: no previous prototype for ‘listConnectionInformation’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] 911 | listConnectionInformation() | ^ About terms. postgres@postgres(17.0)=# \x

Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-08 Thread Jim Jones
Hi Nathan On 09.02.24 03:41, Nathan Bossart wrote: > Separately, does > the server version really belong here? I'm not sure I would consider that > to be connection information. > I tend to agree with you. The info there wouldn't hurt, but perhaps the client version would be a better fit. --

Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-08 Thread Nathan Bossart
Sorry if this has been brought up, but I noticed that some of the information is listed below the result set: postgres=# \conninfo+ Current Connection Information -[ RECORD 1 ]--+- Database | postgres Authenticated User | nathan

RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-08 Thread Maiquel Grassi
On 08.02.24 21:37, Erik Wienhold wrote: >> Modifiers such as + or S in \dS are not covered by autocompletion. >> src/bin/psql/tab-complete.c only specifies backslash commands in their >> basic form (without modifiers). >> >> (\dS actually autocompletes to \ds to my surprise) >> >Aha... I never

Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-08 Thread Jim Jones
Hi Erik On 08.02.24 21:37, Erik Wienhold wrote: > Modifiers such as + or S in \dS are not covered by autocompletion. > src/bin/psql/tab-complete.c only specifies backslash commands in their > basic form (without modifiers). > > (\dS actually autocompletes to \ds to my surprise) > Aha... I never

RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-08 Thread Maiquel Grassi
to understand why this happens. It seems curious to me. I'll try to understand this implementation better. I'm continuing the development of "\conninfo+" and now moving on to tests. Tks a lot! Regards, Maiquel Grassi. v10-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch Description: v10-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch

RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-08 Thread Maiquel Grassi
stgres/blob/fdfb92c0307c95eba10854196628d88e6708901e/src/bin/psql/tab-complete.c In v9, I started the documentation work and am open to suggestions. > "I can do a more thorough review of the code when you add the > documentation and tests to the patch." Soon I'll be developing the tests. And that will be welcome. Thanks a lot! Regards, Maiquel Grassi. v9-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch Description: v9-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch

Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-08 Thread Erik Wienhold
On 2024-02-08 20:37 +0100, Jim Jones wrote: > One thing I just noticed. The psql autocomplete feature does not suggest > the new + option of \conninfo. For instance, when typing "\connin[TAB]" > it automatically autocompletes to "\conninfo ". I guess it should also > be included in this patch.

Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-08 Thread Jim Jones
On 08.02.24 16:50, Maiquel Grassi wrote: > Hi Jim, > Thank you for your support on this patch! > As I believe in its usability, I have been dedicating efforts to make > it really interesting. > I hadn't thought about the permissioning issue for > "unix_socket_directories". I appreciate that. > I

RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-08 Thread Maiquel Grassi
.. since it is not the case with "\conninfo": > > postgres=> \conninfo > You are connected to database "postgres" as user "jim" via socket in > "/tmp" at port "5432". > > Perhaps excluding the column from the result set or returnin

RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-08 Thread Maiquel Grassi
> Hi, > On 07.02.2024 23:13, Maiquel Grassi wrote: > Regarding the "system_user" function, as it is relatively new, I added > the necessary handling to avoid conflicts with versions lower than version 16. > Yes, that's rights. > > A couple of doubts about the implementation details. > But

Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-08 Thread Jim Jones
gres=> \conninfo You are connected to database "postgres" as user "jim" via socket in "/tmp" at port "5432". Perhaps excluding the column from the result set or returning NULL in the affected columns would be less confusing? There are also some inde

Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-08 Thread Pavel Luzanov
Hi, On 07.02.2024 23:13, Maiquel Grassi wrote: Regarding the "system_user" function, as it is relatively new, I added the necessary handling to avoid conflicts with versions lower than version 16. Yes, that's rights. A couple of doubts about the implementation details. But keep in mind

RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-07 Thread Maiquel Grassi
st --++-+--+--+-+++-++-+--+--- postgres | postgres | | postgres | postgres | 26147 | 1

Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-07 Thread Pavel Luzanov
Hi,Maiquel! On 07.02.2024 17:47, Maiquel Grassi wrote: "Also, it seems that the verbose parameter in the listConnectionInformation is unnecessary." Could you point out exactly the line or code snippet you are referring to? +bool +listConnectionInformation(const char *pattern,*bool verbose*)

RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-07 Thread Maiquel Grassi
--+--+--+-+++-++-----+-+--+- postgres | postgres | postgres | postgres | | 16.1 | 192.168.0.5| 5433| 192.168.0.5| 60115 | 28896 | | 192.168.0.5 (1 row) Regards, Maiquel O. Grassi. v6-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch Description: v6-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch

RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-07 Thread Maiquel Grassi
35066 | 15908 | /tmp | 127.0.0.1 (1 row) postgres=# \q [postgres@localhost bin]$ ./psql -h 192.168.0.5 -p 5432 -d postgres -U postgres psql (17devel, server 14.3) Type "help" for help. postgres=# \conninfo You are connected to database "postgres" as user "postgres" on host "192.168.0.5" at port "5432". postgres=# \conninfo+ Current Connection Information Database | User | Server Version | Server Address | Server Port | Client Address | Client Port | Session PID | Socket Directory |Host --+--+++-++-+-+--+- postgres | postgres | 14.3 | 192.168.0.5| 5432| 192.168.0.5| 60904 | 29264 | | 192.168.0.5 Regards, Maiquel O. Grassi. v5-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch Description: v5-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch

Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-07 Thread Pavel Luzanov
This is a good idea about extended connection info. On 07.02.2024 07:13, Maiquel Grassi wrote: SELECT ... current_user AS "User", This will be inconsistent with \conninfo. \conninfo returns authenticated user (PQuser), not the current_user. It might be worth showing current_user,

Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-07 Thread Erik Wienhold
On 2024-02-07 05:13 +0100, Maiquel Grassi wrote: > On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 09:45:54PM +, Maiquel Grassi wrote: > > My initial idea has always been that they should continue to appear > > because \conninfo+ should show all the things that \conninfo shows and > > add more information. I

RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-06 Thread Maiquel Grassi
connected to database "postgres" as user "postgres" on host "192.168.0.5" at port "5433". postgres=# \conninfo+ Current Connection Information Database | User | Server Version | Server Address | Port | Client Address | Client Port | Session PID | Socket Direct

Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-06 Thread Nathan Bossart
On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 09:45:54PM +, Maiquel Grassi wrote: > My initial idea has always been that they should continue to appear > because \conninfo+ should show all the things that \conninfo shows and > add more information. I think that's the purpose of the 'plus.' Now we're > on a better

RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-06 Thread Maiquel Grassi
On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 03:06:05PM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote: > On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 08:52:09PM +, Maiquel Grassi wrote: >> I made the adjustment in the code and updated the patch. I believe this >> is the format suggested by you all. Would this be it? > > I was thinking

RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-06 Thread Maiquel Grassi
el | 127.0.0.1 | 5432 | 127.0.0.1 | 34970 | 31435 (1 row) Regards, Maiquel O. Grassi. v3-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch Description: v3-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch

Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-06 Thread Nathan Bossart
On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 03:06:05PM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote: > On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 08:52:09PM +, Maiquel Grassi wrote: >> I made the adjustment in the code and updated the patch. I believe this >> is the format suggested by you all. Would this be it? > > I was thinking something more

Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-06 Thread Nathan Bossart
On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 08:52:09PM +, Maiquel Grassi wrote: > I made the adjustment in the code and updated the patch. I believe this > is the format suggested by you all. Would this be it? I was thinking something more like SELECT pg_catalog.current_database() AS "Database",

RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-06 Thread Maiquel Grassi
gres=# \conninfo+ Current Connection Information Attribute | Value ----+-- Database | postgres User | postgres Server Version | 17devel Server Address | 127.0.0.1/32 Server Port| 5432 Client Address | 127.0.0.1/32 Client Port| 34924 Session PID| 30223 (8 rows) Regards, Maiquel O. Grassi. v2-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch Description: v2-0001-psql-meta-command-conninfo-plus.patch

Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-06 Thread Erik Wienhold
On 2024-02-06 19:19 +0100, Nathan Bossart wrote: > On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 05:27:01PM +, Maiquel Grassi wrote: > > postgres=# \conninfo+ > > Current Connection Information > >Attribute| Value > > + > > Database | postgres > > User

Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-06 Thread Nathan Bossart
On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 05:27:01PM +, Maiquel Grassi wrote: > I'm seeking to improve the \conninfo meta-command in psql. Currently, it > provides limited information about the current connection. I believe that > expanding it using the concept of "plus" [+] could ease the work of DBAs, >

Psql meta-command conninfo+

2024-02-06 Thread Maiquel Grassi
as user "postgres" on host "127.0.0.1" at port "5432". postgres=# \conninfo+ Current Connection Information Attribute|Value +-- Database | postgres User | postgres Server Version | 17devel Server Address | 127.0.0.1