On 29.03.24 02:42, David G. Johnston wrote:
We do use the term "stand-alone composite" in create type so I'm
inclined to use it instead of "composite created with CREATE TYPE";
especially in the error messages; I'm a bit more willing to add the
cross-reference to create type in the user docs.
On 2024-04-04 03:29 +0200, David G. Johnston wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 8:02 PM Erik Wienhold wrote:
>
> > Thanks, that sounds better. I incorporated that with some minor edits
> > in the attached v3.
> >
>
> You added my missing ( but dropped the comma after "i.e."
Thanks, fixed in v4.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 8:02 PM Erik Wienhold wrote:
> Thanks, that sounds better. I incorporated that with some minor edits
> in the attached v3.
>
Looks good.
You added my missing ( but dropped the comma after "i.e."
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/create_table.sgml
On 2024-03-29 02:42 +0100, David G. Johnston wrote:
> For consideration for the doc portion. The existing wording is too
> imprecise for my liking and just tacking on "expects...create type" is
> jarring.
>
> """
> Creates a typed table, which takes it structure from an existing (name
>
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 9:29 PM Erik Wienhold wrote:
> I wrote:
> > The attached v2 is a simpler patch that instead modifies the existing
> > error message.
>
> Forgot to attach v2.
>
>
For consideration for the doc portion. The existing wording is too
imprecise for my liking and just tacking on
I wrote:
> The attached v2 is a simpler patch that instead modifies the existing
> error message.
Forgot to attach v2.
--
Erik
>From 9ab6b625e8f93ae2957144ec7f0ba32cf8a3bb5b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Erik Wienhold
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 04:21:56 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v2] Document that
I wrote:
> The attached patch fixes the error message and also documents that
> requirement.
On second thought, adding a separate error message doesn't really make
sense. The attached v2 is a simpler patch that instead modifies the
existing error message.
--
Erik
On 2024-03-08 01:12 +0100, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> I could not find any explanation of the following behaviour in docs -
>
>
> Our documentation for CREATE TABLE says:
>
> CREATE TABLE also automatically creates a data type that represents
> the composite type corresponding to one row of the
I could not find any explanation of the following behaviour in docs -
Our documentation for CREATE TABLE says:
CREATE TABLE also automatically creates a data type that represents
the composite type corresponding to one row of the table. Therefore,
tables cannot have the same name as any
