Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms

2001-04-22 Thread Patrick Welche
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 11:41:55AM -0700, Henry B. Hotz wrote: At 1:50 AM -0400 4/6/01, Tom Lane wrote: ... What version of libreadline do you have installed, and how does it declare completion_matches()? I have whatever is standard on NetBSD 1.5. I noticed that configure found a

[HACKERS] Replication through WAL

2001-04-22 Thread Chad La Joie
Is there an easy way to read the WAL files generated by Postgres? I'm looking into writting a replication deamon for postgres and think that the WAL files are the best way to know what has happened to the db and what has to be replicated. I have a roughed out idea of how to code it up but the

Re: [HACKERS] Replication through WAL

2001-04-22 Thread Bruce Momjian
Is there an easy way to read the WAL files generated by Postgres? I'm looking into writting a replication deamon for postgres and think that the WAL files are the best way to know what has happened to the db and what has to be replicated. I have a roughed out idea of how to code it up but

[HACKERS] Compiler warning (V7.1 plpgsql)

2001-04-22 Thread Yasuo Ohgaki
It's nothing but unused definitions. PostgreSQL7.1 compiles and works for me. I got following warnings for PL/PgSQL make[2]: `/opt/rh7/postgresql/postgresql-7.1/src/pl' make[3]: `/opt/rh7/postgresql/postgresql-7.1/src/pl/plpgsql' make -C src all make[4]:

[HACKERS] How to determine if a user exists..

2001-04-22 Thread Dominic J. Eidson
I am trying to add another authentication mechanism to PostgreSQL... And, in doing that, I need to verify the existance of an user within PG. Short of hacking together code from verify_password(), is there any way to check if a user exists in postgresql? (The actuall password verification will

Re: [HACKERS] well, now i wish we hadn't gutted the ipv6 support

2001-04-22 Thread Paul A Vixie
AFAIK we never actually *had* IPV6 support in those datatypes, only stubs for it. the inet_net_pton implementation that was brought in from BIND had its IPv6 portions scrubbed. micro-over-optimization of the contributed bitncmp caused the ipv4 as int assumption to reoccur. i'm going to have

Re: [HACKERS] well, now i wish we hadn't gutted the ipv6 support

2001-04-22 Thread Tom Lane
Paul A Vixie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: my original CIDR type implementation used BIND's inet_ntop() and inet_pton() which therefore included latent support for ipv6. it wouldn't take a huge amount of effort to bring this back, would it? AFAIK we never actually *had* IPV6 support in those

[HACKERS] well, now i wish we hadn't gutted the ipv6 support

2001-04-22 Thread Paul A Vixie
my original CIDR type implementation used BIND's inet_ntop() and inet_pton() which therefore included latent support for ipv6. it wouldn't take a huge amount of effort to bring this back, would it? (the user below is using VARCHAR for his ip addresses for this reason.) --- Forwarded