Dnia 24-05-2005, wto o godzinie 00:06 -0400, Tom Lane napisa(a):
Joe Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Markus Bertheau wrote:
why does SELECT ARRAY(SELECT 1 WHERE FALSE) return NULL instead of
ARRAY[] resp. '{}'?
Why would you expect an empty array instead of a NULL?
I think he's got
On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 22:43 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Based on the comments so far in this thread, I'll go ahead and commit
the patch, with some comments attached of course --- in particular a big
head comment to run flex with -b and see that lex.backup says something
to this effect.
flex counts
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Furthermore, this patch detaches empty fsmpages then.
Does that do anything useful though?
I thought we don't reallocate until VACUUM time, whereupon we identify
any empty slots and reuse them. Who cares whether we deallocate earlier?
Yes, we cannot
On Tue, 24 May 2005 01:26 am, --= Tono =-- wrote:
I have tried using INSTEAD rules but there are some
conditional logic that needs to happen inside the rule
(performing counts, getting and storing the primary
key of the master record etc.). AFAIK, rules only
allows conditional logic to be
I tried using SELECTs inside of RULEs, but as I already explained in
this mail thread, the problem is, that a SELECT creates a result set,
which can not be discarded in SQL. This makes trouble when using
asynchronous command processing.
I have tried to modify my application in order to get a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I'm trying to install 8.0.3 on a RH9.0.
I do have few problems:
1) They do not exist for 9.0
2) Using the 8.0.2 rpm I get:
# rpm -Uvh --test *.rpm
warning: postgresql-8.0.2-1PGDG.i686.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID
748f7d0e
error:
Check the archives, this has already been discussed.
Devrim is posting a compat rpm shortly.
Dave
Gaetano Mendola wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I'm trying to install 8.0.3 on a RH9.0.
I do have few problems:
1) They do not exist for 9.0
2) Using the 8.0.2 rpm
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Would we use the -x switch if we had it?
Dunno. Depending on such a thing would require depending on a new flex
version, and seeing that the flex guys haven't put out a new release
since the badly broken 2.5.31 more than 2 years ago, I wouldn't hold
my
Jan B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I tried using SELECTs inside of RULEs, but as I already explained in this
mail thread, the problem is, that a SELECT creates a result set, which can
not be discarded in SQL. This makes trouble when using asynchronous command
Jan B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does anyone know, if it is intended that one query can create multiple
result tables with some of them carrying an empty string as cmdStatus?
Perhaps this is a bug?
Yes it is, and no it isn't. Check the archives --- there was extensive
discussion of what
Dave Cramer wrote:
Check the archives, this has already been discussed.
Devrim is posting a compat rpm shortly.
Thx.
Regards
Gaetano Mendola
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can find it here if you need it quickly
http://postgresql.gunduz.org/rpms/compat-postgresql-libs-3-1PGDG.i686.rpm
Dave
Gaetano Mendola wrote:
Dave Cramer wrote:
Check the archives, this has already been discussed.
Devrim is posting a compat rpm shortly.
Thx.
Regards
Gaetano
I've been working on adding the functionality into the jdbc driver and
I'm having some issues.
Currently the bind message does not know anything about directionality
of the parameter. This means that considerable gyrations need to be done
by the driver to transform
create function foo( out
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Gaetano,
On Tue, 24 May 2005, Dave Cramer wrote:
You can find it here if you need it quickly
http://postgresql.gunduz.org/rpms/compat-postgresql-libs-3-1PGDG.i686.rpm
Yeah, that package was tested on 5 platforms. Also Dave Cramer confirmed
Dave Cramer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On a related note, drop function needs to support the in/out direction.
It does ... do you see a problem?
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at
Hi,
I was redirected to this maillist when i asked questions on irc. I
hope this is the right mailing list.
I am running postgresql 7.4.8 on solaris 10 (and I compile and
installed slony). Everytime I am trying to reload the configuration
using pg_ctl reload -D $PGDATA, it deleted the
H
It seems to me that the bind message needs to support the notion of
direction in order for this to work cleanly.
Alternatively we could punt and use SQL Server's mechanism where they
only support IN, and INOUT, which would require all parameters to be
sent to the procedure.
Does
Junaili,
I am running postgresql 7.4.8 on solaris 10 (and I compile and
installed slony). Everytime I am trying to reload the configuration
using pg_ctl reload -D $PGDATA, it deleted the postmaster.pid and
didn't create a new one. So, after reload, the only way I can restart
the server is by
Dave Cramer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
create function foo( out p1 int, in p2 int, out p3 int)
then a subsequent
{call = select foo(?,?,?)}
This would need to be currently transformed into select foo(?), with the
other two being discarded.
It seems to me that the bind message
Junaili Lie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am running postgresql 7.4.8 on solaris 10 (and I compile and
installed slony). Everytime I am trying to reload the configuration
using pg_ctl reload -D $PGDATA, it deleted the postmaster.pid and
didn't create a new one.
That's very strange. The pg_ctl
Ok, then I guess the documentation needs to indicate that. Or the
version I am reading is not up to date.
Dave
Tom Lane wrote:
Dave Cramer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On a related note, drop function needs to support the in/out direction.
It does ... do you see a
At this point I'd just like the backend to ignore the OUT parameter if
it were set that way, but allow
it to be sent.
If you consider that a function could have for arguments sake 10
parameters, and they
can be ordered in any fashion; clients have to essentially parse out the
OUT parameters
Tom,
How would it help for BIND to incorporate direction? What would it even
*mean* for BIND to incorporate direction --- it's a client-to-server
message, and can hardly be expected to transmit data in the reverse
direction.
Where directionality comes in is with OUT-only parameters.
Folks,
I am running postgresql 7.4.8 on solaris 10 (and I compile and
installed slony). Everytime I am trying to reload the configuration
using pg_ctl reload -D $PGDATA, it deleted the postmaster.pid and
didn't create a new one. So, after reload, the only way I can restart
the
Dave Cramer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At this point I'd just like the backend to ignore the OUT parameter if
it were set that way, but allow it to be sent.
I think you're thinking at the wrong level. AIUI the issue occurs at
the Parse stage, long before any parameter value is sent (or not
Josh Berkus josh@agliodbs.com writes:
Looking at his report, what's happening is that the postmaster is shutting
down, but the other backends are not ... they're hanging around as
zombies.
The zombies couldn't be dead backends if the postmaster has gone away:
in every Unix I know, a zombie
Dave Cramer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok, then I guess the documentation needs to indicate that. Or the
version I am reading is not up to date.
Oh, you're right, I overlooked adding that to the documentation of
the other statement types that work with function names.
Come to think of it, the
Tom,
The zombies couldn't be dead backends if the postmaster has gone away:
in every Unix I know, a zombie process disappears instantly if its
parent dies (since the only reason for a zombie in the first place
is to hold the process' exit status until the parent reads it with
wait()).
yeah,
Hi,
Thank you all for the respond.
I should probably mentioned that postgres is maintained by smf, which
is a service management tool in solaris 10.
I asked our sys admin to remove postgres from being managed by smf.
he did that. But right now he is having problem because the system
could not
Hey everyone,
I've been working with a couple people who didn't know that soundex and
metaphone were included in the distribution as contrib modules. While
it's their fault that they didn't check contrib, soundex is pretty
common among database systems and I was wondering if there was a
Tom,
I am not too sure how to determine the unlink call.
Can you provide more information/instructions?
In my case the pg_ctl reload -D /usr/local/pgsql deleted the
postmaster.pid without creating a new one. I am not too sure if this
is normal.
J
On 5/24/05, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
People:
OK, found it in SQL99:
SQL parameter declaration ::=
[ parameter mode ] [ SQL parameter name ] parameter type [ RESULT ]
parameter mode ::=
IN
| OUT
| INOUT
... so this is something we need to support, apparently both for Functions and
Procedures (when we get the latter), in the
Tom Lane wrote:
Dunno. Depending on such a thing would require depending on a new flex
version, and seeing that the flex guys haven't put out a new release
since the badly broken 2.5.31 more than 2 years ago, I wouldn't hold
my breath waiting for one we can use.
It should be easy enough to
33 matches
Mail list logo
