On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 5:36 AM, Itagaki Takahiro
itagaki.takah...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/1/27 Hiroshi Inoue in...@tpf.co.jp:
I see now the following lines in libintl.h of version
0.18.1.1 which didn't exist in 0.17 version.
The macro may cause a trouble especially on Windows.
Attached is a
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 20:27 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
So I don't see why one particular kind of recovery conflict
should be in a different class than all the others.
This point has been explained many times and is very clear in the code.
It has a clear functional purpose, not decoration or
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 5:40 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
AFAICT that would break on-disk compatibility of pg_trgm GIST indexes.
I don't believe we have adequate evidence to justify doing that, and
in any case it ought to be a separate patch rather than buried inside a
mostly
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 20:52 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
Seems a little weird to me, since the administrator hasn't done
anything.
Sure he
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 07:56, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/2/1 Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 05:53, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
There are broken links inside messages from commiters.
projects /
404 - No such
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 09:08, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 5:36 AM, Itagaki Takahiro
itagaki.takah...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/1/27 Hiroshi Inoue in...@tpf.co.jp:
I see now the following lines in libintl.h of version
0.18.1.1 which didn't exist in 0.17 version.
The
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 09:08, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 5:36 AM, Itagaki Takahiro
itagaki.takah...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/1/27 Hiroshi Inoue in...@tpf.co.jp:
I see now the following lines
On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 07:35 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 03:29, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Then again - in theory, there's no reason why we couldn't drop a
database on the master when
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 17:55 -0600, Kevin Grittner wrote:
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=users/kgrittn/postgres.git;a=commitdiff;h=6360b0d4ca88c09cf590a75409cd29831afff58b
With confidence that it works, I looked it over some more and now
like this a lot. It is definitely more readable
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 02:25, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Magnus Hagander wrote:
I just tried doing pg_upgrade on a database when logged in as user
mha rather than postgres on my system. And it failed. Even though
the db was initialized with superuser mha. The reason for this was
2011/2/1 Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 07:56, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/2/1 Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 05:53, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
There are broken links inside messages
On 1 February 2011 05:31, Itagaki Takahiro itagaki.takah...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 00:37, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
I've attached a small patch for the docs which adds a reference to the
client_encoding parameter description. This is in response to someone
attempting
On 02/01/2011 03:47 AM, Dave Page wrote:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Magnus Hagandermag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 09:08, Dave Pagedp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 5:36 AM, Itagaki Takahiro
itagaki.takah...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/1/27 Hiroshi
List,
Can anyone suggest where the below error comes from, given I'm attempting to
load HTTP access log data with reasonably small row and column value lengths?
logs=# COPY raw FROM '/path/to/big/log/file' DELIMITER E'\t' CSV;
ERROR: out of memory
DETAIL: Cannot
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
Why are we only disabling the macro for WIN32 and not for the other
platforms that the macro is defined for? Do we know it's not also a problem
on Apple or Cygwin?
No, not as far as I know.
--
Dave Page
Blog:
Updated patch attached.
I think we need to improve postgresql.conf.sample a bit more, especially
the long line for #log_csv_fields = '...'. 330 characters in it!
#1. Leave the long line because it is needed.
#2. Hide the variable from the default conf.
#3. Use short %x mnemonic both in
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 17:12, Marko Tiikkaja
marko.tiikk...@cs.helsinki.fi wrote:
I still didn't address
the issue with pg_advisory_unlock_all() releasing transaction scoped locks,
I guess you don't want independent locks, right? If an user object
is locked by session locks, it also blocks
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:08, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
Why are we only disabling the macro for WIN32 and not for the other
platforms that the macro is defined for? Do we know it's not also a problem
on Apple
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 7:28 AM, Itagaki Takahiro
itagaki.takah...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 17:12, Marko Tiikkaja
marko.tiikk...@cs.helsinki.fi wrote:
I still didn't address
the issue with pg_advisory_unlock_all() releasing transaction scoped locks,
I guess you don't want
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 9:53 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
It would help if you were a bit more specific. Do you mean you want
to write something like foo.bar(baz) and have that mean call the bar
method of foo and pass it baz as an argument?
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
CREATE METHOD next_color (n INT)
RETURNS INT
FOR colored_part_t
RETURN SELF.color_id + n
SELECT partno, color_id, DEREF(oid).next_color(1) AS next
FROM colored_parts
DEREF(oid)? That's just bizarre.
--
Robert
2011/2/1 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 9:53 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
It would help if you were a bit more specific. Do you mean you want
to write something like foo.bar(baz) and have that mean call the bar
Itagaki Takahiro itagaki.takah...@gmail.com writes:
Hi, the attached is a further cleanup of the latest commit
(1db20cdd36cb1c2cc5ef2210a23b3c09f5058690).
Thanks! Given that the patch contains some merging from master's
branch, I'm not sure if I should apply it to my repository then handle
2011/2/1 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
CREATE METHOD next_color (n INT)
RETURNS INT
FOR colored_part_t
RETURN SELF.color_id + n
SELECT partno, color_id, DEREF(oid).next_color(1) AS next
FROM colored_parts
Em 14-01-2011 17:41, Jaime Casanova escreveu:
Here is a patch that implements named restore points.
Sorry, I was swamped with work. :(
Your patch no longer applied so I rebased it and slightly modified it. Review
is below...
+ The default is to recover to the end of the WAL log.
+
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
The SQL standard has the method invocation clause that appears to
allow:
...something.column.method(args)
Good luck finding out how to interpret the dots, but it's specified
somewhere.
My head just exploded.
It'd
On mån, 2011-01-31 at 21:53 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
You would probably have better luck shoehorning in such a feature if the
syntax looked like this:
(foo).bar(baz)
foo being a value of some type that has methods, and bar being a method
name.
The SQL standard has the method
Greg Smith wrote:
I think the right way to compute relations to sync is to finish the
sorted writes patch I sent over a not quite right yet update to already
Attached update now makes much more sense than the misguided patch I
submitted two weesk ago. This takes the original sorted write
hi,
I wrote:
y...@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) writes:
after systable_getnext_ordered returned NULL, is it ok to call it again?
I wouldn't rely on it working.
i'm wondering because inv_truncate seems to do it and expecting NULL.
Hmm, that may well be a bug. Have you tested
hi,
thanks for taking a look.
y...@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) writes:
the attached patch is to avoid unnecessary detoast'ing and EOF marker pages
when possible. does it make sense?
The blob page size is already chosen not to allow for out-of-line
storage, not to mention that
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Here's the basic patch, will work on the refactoring if no objections.
ResolveRecoveryConflictWithDatabase works when you're not in recovery?
That seems pretty fragile at best. In any case, this is a 9.2 feature
at the earliest, please do not expect
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:22, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
This looks pretty good. But why are we bothering to keep $prolog at all any
more, if all we're going to pass it is PL_sv_no all the time? Maybe we'll
have a use for it in the future, but right now we don't appear to
Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com wrote:
One thing that confused me a little about the code is the default
case at the end. The enum is exhaustive, so the default doesn't
really make sense. The compiler warning you are silencing is the
uninitialized variable xid (right?)
Right.
Since you
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 01:34, Alexey Klyukin al...@commandprompt.com wrote:
I've looked at the patch and added a test for arrays exceeding or equal
maximum dimensions to check, whether the recursive function won't bring
surprises there. I've also added check_stack_depth calls to both
Dimitri Fontaine dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr writes:
Itagaki Takahiro itagaki.takah...@gmail.com writes:
Hi, the attached is a further cleanup of the latest commit
(1db20cdd36cb1c2cc5ef2210a23b3c09f5058690).
Thanks! Given that the patch contains some merging from master's
branch, I'm not sure if
Christopher Hotchkiss christopher.hotchk...@gmail.com writes:
I would like to propose (and volunteer to do if its considered to be a
decent idea) to extend the mapping of users to roles in the pg_ident.conf to
incorporate groups.
Um ... there isn't any real distinction between users and groups
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
So I'm back to proposing that we just apply FPI-free WAL records
unconditionally, without regard to the LSN. This could potentially
corrupt the page, of course.
Yes. So you're still assuming that there will be a later FPI-containing
WAL record to fix
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
Back to the idea at hand - I proposed something a bit along these
lines upthread, but my idea was to proactively perform the fsyncs on
the relations that had gone the longest without a
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
So I'm back to proposing that we just apply FPI-free WAL records
unconditionally, without regard to the LSN. This could potentially
corrupt the page, of course.
Yes. So you're
On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 11:01 -0600, Kevin Grittner wrote:
My compiler doesn't.
Strange. Maybe it requires -O2?
Would it make sense to elog here, rather than
Assert? I'm not clear on the rules for that.
elog looks fine there to me, assuming we have the default case. I'm not
100% clear on the
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I also think Bruce's idea of calling fsync() on each relation just
*before* we start writing the pages from that relation might have
some merit.
What bothers me about that is that you may have a lot of the same
dirty pages in the OS cache as the
On tis, 2011-01-18 at 19:24 -0500, Steve Singer wrote:
However if I connect with a line in pg_hba that matches on an IP
network then my client_hostname is always null unless log_hostname is
set to true. This is consistent with the behavior you describe but I
think the average user will find
Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 02:25, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Magnus Hagander wrote:
I just tried doing pg_upgrade on a database when logged in as user
mha rather than postgres on my system. And it failed. Even though
the db was initialized with superuser mha.
Hi,
PFA version 3 of the ALTER EXTENSION PATCH, cleaned and merged against
recent HEAD and extension's branch from which I just produced the v30
patch.
It includes a way to upgrade from null, that is from pre-9.1, and the
specific upgrade files to achieve that for all contribs. That goes like
Robert Haas wrote:
Back to your idea: One problem with trying to bound the unflushed data
is that it's not clear what the bound should be. I've had this mental
model where we want the OS to write out pages to disk, but that's not
always true, per Greg Smith's recent posts about Linux kernel
Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 11:01 -0600, Kevin Grittner wrote:
My compiler doesn't.
Strange. Maybe it requires -O2?
That's not it; I see -O2 in my compiles.
At any rate, I think the default clause is the best place to quash
the warning because that leaves us
Greg Smith wrote:
Greg Smith wrote:
I think the right way to compute relations to sync is to finish the
sorted writes patch I sent over a not quite right yet update to already
Attached update now makes much more sense than the misguided patch I
submitted two weesk ago. This takes the
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I also think Bruce's idea of calling fsync() on each relation just
*before* we start writing the pages from that relation might have
some merit.
What bothers me about
Kevin Grittner wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I also think Bruce's idea of calling fsync() on each relation just
*before* we start writing the pages from that relation might have
some merit.
What bothers me about that is that you may have a lot of the same
dirty
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On tis, 2011-01-18 at 19:24 -0500, Steve Singer wrote:
However if I connect with a line in pg_hba that matches on an IP
network then my client_hostname is always null unless log_hostname is
set to true. This is consistent
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
My trivial idea was: let's assume we checkpoint every 10 minutes, and
it takes 5 minutes for us to write the data to the kernel. If no one
else is writing to those files, we can safely wait maybe 5 more minutes
before issuing the fsync. If, however,
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
My trivial idea was: let's assume we checkpoint every 10 minutes, and
it takes 5 minutes for us to write the data to the kernel. If no one
else is writing to those files, we can safely wait maybe 5 more minutes
before issuing the
On Feb 1, 2011, at 12:39 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Christopher Hotchkiss christopher.hotchk...@gmail.com writes:
I would like to propose (and volunteer to do if its considered to be a
decent idea) to extend the mapping of users to roles in the pg_ident.conf to
incorporate groups.
* Christopher Hotchkiss wrote:
I would like to propose (and volunteer to do if its considered to be a
decent idea) to extend the mapping of users to roles in the
pg_ident.conf to incorporate groups. This would allow any user who
belonged to a particular group in certain authentication systems
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Christian Ullrich ch...@chrullrich.net wrote:
* Christopher Hotchkiss wrote:
I would like to propose (and volunteer to do if its considered to be a
decent idea) to extend the mapping of users to roles in the
pg_ident.conf to incorporate groups. This would allow
On 02/01/2011 03:36 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Nick Rudnickjoerg.rudn...@t-online.de wrote:
* In this regard it is of interest in how far there are principal efficiency
problems with the support of (deeply nested) object like structure by the
backend, or if the
On ons, 2011-01-19 at 10:16 +0900, Hitoshi Harada wrote:
Thanks. I tested the new version and looks ok. I'll mark it Ready for
Commiter.
Committed.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
Nick Rudnick joerg.rudn...@t-online.de wrote:
here an inelegant example
Based on that example, you should be sure to look at the INHERITS
clause of CREATE TABLE:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/interactive/sql-createtable.html
PostgreSQL has the is a structure built in. That may
Hi Pavel,
I guess this represents most exactly what this professor is thinking
about -- being able to create methods and types with methods which can
be nested -- but syntactical details are of secondary importance.
All the best, Nick
On 02/01/2011 05:43 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
Hello
it
Hi Peter,
Another possibility is
foo-bar(baz)
This is in the SQL standard underattribute or method reference, but
it requires the left side to be of a reference type, which is something
that we don't have.
I think this is the point where I stopped my efforts in the past -- I
guessed
Hi Kevin,
this example was for teaching AI students (with limited PostgreSQL
knowledge) in a very basic lecture -- I did not want to tweak the SQL
semantics too much; just demonstrate why SQL is rightfully called a 4GL
language. ;-)
Cheers, Nick
On 02/01/2011 10:08 PM, Kevin Grittner
* Christopher Hotchkiss wrote:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Christian Ullrichch...@chrullrich.net wrote:
* Christopher Hotchkiss wrote:
I would like to propose (and volunteer to do if its considered to be a
decent idea) to extend the mapping of users to roles in the
pg_ident.conf to
Tom Lane wrote:
At this point what we've got is 25% of the runtime in nodeAgg.c overhead,
and it's difficult to see how to get any real improvement without tackling
that. Rather than apply the patch shown above, I'm tempted to think about
hard-wiring COUNT(*) as a special case in nodeAgg.c
On 02/01/2011 05:47 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
At this point what we've got is 25% of the runtime in nodeAgg.c overhead,
and it's difficult to see how to get any real improvement without tackling
that. Rather than apply the patch shown above, I'm tempted to think about
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
On 02/01/2011 05:47 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
At this point what we've got is 25% of the runtime in nodeAgg.c overhead,
and it's difficult to see how to get any real improvement without tackling
that.
Do we want a TODO about
On 2/1/2011 5:47 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Do we want a TODO about optimizing COUNT(*) to avoid aggregate
processing overhead?
Definitely not. In my opinion, and I've seen more than a few database
designs, having count(*) is almost always an error.
If I am counting a large table like the one
Hi everyone, I just want to know something about postgresql parser, because
I want to add a new feature for pgAdmin graphical query builder (GQB) that
allow an user to create a query graphical model from a sql statment, and I
just want to reuse postgres parser code (reuse this) to do the task of
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
The parallel pg_dump portion of this patch (i.e. the still-uncommitted
part) no longer applies. Please rebase.
Here is a rebased version with some minor changes as well. I haven't
tested it on Windows now but will do so
68 matches
Mail list logo
