On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 08:40:56PM +0200, Michael Paesold wrote:
I hope you will be willing to comment on the issues when times come. I am
not really satisfied myself, but without further discussion I did not want
to continue to work on it. Anyway, I understand this is not the right time
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 03:33:01PM -0300, Haroldo Stenger wrote:
Haroldo,
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 11:47:35 -0400, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The other objection is that this would create very substantial overhead.
why?
Establishing a savepoint is a non-trivial operation (cost-wise).
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 12:24:06PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
My discovery last night of a WAL synchronization error in pg_clog led me
to take a look at pg_subtrans too. I soon realized that in fact we are
not WAL-logging pg_subtrans updates at all: subtransaction start sets up
a pg_subtrans
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 04:44:58PM +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
I read this in the release notes:
---
# Database-wide ANALYZE does not hold locks across tables (Tom)
This reduces the potential for deadlocks against other backends that
want exclusive locks on tables. To get the
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 11:56:17AM +1000, fastpgs wrote:
On Sun, 8 Aug 2004 08:19, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
If the change is global, what should happen on other sessions that have
a deferred event from that trigger concurrently with the one that
modifies it? Should the answer be different
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 08:19:17PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Very cool and interesting idea.
Does anyone have a problem with this macro syntax? The try/catch names
are stolen from Java, so I'm figuring they won't terribly surprise any
modern programmer, but I'm open to different names if anyone
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 12:39:08PM -0400, Neil Conway wrote:
A copy that claims to represent an almost indistinuishable delta on the
actual SQL 2003 database standard is available online here:
http://www.wiscorp.com/sql/sql_2003_standard.zip
Those are PDFs AFAIR, not easily greppable ...
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 04:55:50PM +0200, Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD wrote:
It is too late to think about pushing back another month. We had this
discussion already. June 1 is it.
I thought the outcome of that discussion was June 15 ?
I think there was no outcome. There was no official
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 07:00:05PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Please recompile with debug symbols and report back the stack trace.
See the faq on running debug.
No, I already did that (all my builds are like that anyway and I read
stack traces more frequently than I'd like). The can't read
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 08:38:29PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera Munoz wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 07:00:05PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Please recompile with debug symbols and report back the stack trace.
See the faq on running debug.
No, I already did that (all my builds are like
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 10:13:56AM -0800, David Fetter wrote:
I'm looking to the SQL WITH clause as a way to get better regex
support in PostgreSQL. I've been chatting a little bit about this,
and here's an idea for a behavior. Implementation details TBD.
I think you could be rather looking
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 04:14:43PM +0100, Manfred Koizar wrote:
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 10:43:18 -0500 (EST), Bruce Momjian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where are we on nested transactions. Is it something we can get for 7.5?
I honestly don't know. I've been working on other things lately and
have
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 06:03:05PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut - PostgreSQL wrote:
Modified files:
src/bin/initdb : nls.mk
Added files:
src/bin/initdb/po: it.po
Are you going to keep managing these things? I received your email about a
CVS write account so I could handle them for
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 04:24:25PM -0500, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
I don't want to add tables to existing databases, as I consider that
clutter and I never like using tools that clutter my production
databases. [...]
Actually, this might be a necessary addition as pg_autovacuum
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 10:39:24AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
(c) Do I need to consider inheritance?
Yes. I think it'd be good if things were constrained so that columns
1..n in a parent table always matched columns 1..n in every child,
which is not true now after adding/dropping columns.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 07:52:55PM +, Jon Jensen wrote:
Is there a mailing list somewhere that all the CVS commits get sent to?
Yes, pgsql-committers.
Other projects I've worked on have such a list, and each commit message is
followed by a complete diff (usually with -u for
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 10:09:12PM +0300, Hannu Krosing wrote:
So what you really need is the CLUSTER command to leave pages half-empty
and the tuple placement logic on inserts/updates to place new tuples
near the place where they would be placed by CLUSTER. I.e. the code that
does actual
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 04:36:10PM -0400, tachuelita wrote:
I was following an example on a book, and when I compiled it, it
finishes with the error: 1075 Function Prototypes are an ANSI feature.
Huh, you need the real compiler from HP. The one bundled with the
operating system is apparently
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 04:53:06PM +0200, Gaetano Mendola wrote:
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The particular assertion that was proposed doesn't strike me as terribly
useful - It should be checked at the point of call rather than inside
pstrdup, I should have thought.
Are
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 11:21:05AM -0700, Jenny - wrote:
I think the locks would actually by represented by PROCLOCK structures.
The LOCK structures are for lockable objects, not for actual locks.
Well,from what i understand, PROCLOCK stores the TransactionID and the LOCK
its holding lock
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 08:56:31AM -0700, Jenny - wrote:
I am working on a project that involves displaying locking information
about each lock taken, whether it be a row level or table leve llock.
When dealing with struct LOCK (src/include/storage) i have noticed that
postgreSQL creates a
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 01:28:16PM +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
Hi guys,
Where can I find a list of all the 'special' characters in the ~* operator?
They are the same for the ~ operator, and should be listed at the reference page
for regular expressions...
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 04:01:33PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can I have a TODO for this?
* Prevent accidental re-use of sysids for dropped users and groups
The other part of the thread was something like
* Prevent dropping user that still owns
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 03:36:07PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
This leaves us with a bit of a problem, though, because there isn't any
libpq API that allows access to this speedup. I put in a routine to
support Parse/Bind/Execute so that people could use out-of-line
parameters for safety reasons
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 10:33:55PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom, you saw this suggestion, right?
I didn't hear anyone else agreeing with it ...
Well, if this needs a vote, I'm for something like maximum/default/minimum
rather than the way it currently
Hackers,
Two buglets:
The first one is in createlang, trying to create a language without
enough permission:
$ createlang -d alvherre plpgsql
createlang: language installation failed: ERROR: c: permission denied
What's the c it's complaning about?
The second one is in pg_get_triggerdef():
Hackers,
Is there a way to create a table from a prepared statement? CREATE TABLE AS
explicitly says you have to use a SELECT statement, and the SELECT INTO
syntax doesn't seem to allow the use of a prepared statement either. I
don't see a way to use the prepared statement as a function nor as
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 09:44:21AM -0600, scott.marlowe wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
Everything Nigel just wrote plus one thing.
If it comes down to it, we could always require a --locale setting and
refuse to initdb without it. That way, whether it's in an RPM or
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 09:04:18AM -0400, Michael Brusser wrote:
Well, first thing I'd ask is whether the other installation is using
the same locale settings.
Oh, yes, I am very sure of that.
Note that while the machine reports the C locale, pg_controldata
actually said the database was
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 12:59:56PM +0200, Sailesh Krishnamurthy wrote:
elog(NOTICE should send NOTICE messages to the psql client (I think !)
while elog(LOG while only send it to the logfile you might have
specified while starting the postmaster
Whether a given elog level is sent to the
30 matches
Mail list logo
