Re: [HACKERS] One-shot expanded output in psql using \G

2017-01-28 Thread Cat
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 11:03:05AM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote: > Well, I did get the impression that you weren't thinking about that, > which is actually kind of surpirsing to me. Lots of things work on "the > current query buffer", which is the last query (successful or not, to be > clear..): >

Re: [HACKERS] 10.0

2016-06-14 Thread Cat
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 01:38:44PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On 06/14/2016 12:46 PM, Jim Nasby wrote: > > >Any ideas on naming for such a function? version_detail()? I suppose > >while we're at this we might as well provide the compile details as well. > > version(detail) or

[HACKERS] Feature Request: inline comments

2007-11-07 Thread CaT
Whilst reading http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/interactive/sql-comment.html I came across this user comment: Ricardo Bánffy 04 Sep 2007 18:15:44 It is a pretty obvious suggestion I bet was made many, many times before, but it would be very useful if

Re: [HACKERS] Feature Request: inline comments

2007-11-07 Thread CaT
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 06:32:53PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: CaT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It is a pretty obvious suggestion I bet was made many, many times before, but it would be very useful if you could create comments while creating the objects themselves, like CREATE TABLE FOO