Re: [HACKERS] list of credits for release notes

> On 27 Sep 2017, at 19:47, Peter Eisentraut > wrote: > > At the PGCon Developer Meeting it was agreed[0] to add a list of credits > to the release notes, including everyone who was mentioned in a commit > message. I have now completed that list. Wow, it’s

Re: [HACKERS] pl/perl extension fails on Windows

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Dave Page <dp...@postgresql.org> writes: > > It's ActiveState Perl 5.8.8. Printing $Config{ccflags} doesn't seem to do > > anything, but perl -V output is below: > > That's weird ... you get

Re: [HACKERS] pl/perl extension fails on Windows

P_UNREACHABLE handling in Net::Ping Built under MSWin32 Compiled at Jan 23 2007 15:57:46 @INC: c:/perl/site/lib c:/perl/lib . C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 8\VC> -- Dave Page PostgreSQL Core Team http://www.postgresql.org/

Re: [HACKERS] pl/perl extension fails on Windows

re? > Well crake is a Fedora box - and we have no problems on Linux, only on Windows. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Re: [HACKERS] Patch - Tcl 8.6 version support for PostgreSQL

On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > Something like the (untested) attached perhaps? > > Looks plausible, I'm not in a position to test though. Sandeep/Paresh - can you test please

Re: [HACKERS] Patch - Tcl 8.6 version support for PostgreSQL

sql. org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=eaba54c20c5ab2cb6aaffa57fd 4990dfe2c7 -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Re: [HACKERS] Monitoring roles patch

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 30 March 2017 at 18:29, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > >> Moving to commit this over the next hour. Last chance... > > Done. Great work Dave, thanks everybody. Thanks Si

Re: [HACKERS] Monitoring roles patch

cute permissions GRANTed to pg_monitor 12) Un-redacted use of the functions underpinning the pg_stat_* views is available to pg_read_all_stats. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Comp

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule and Release Management Team for PG10

ous >> ones, so it seems reasonable to give more time. We have a large number >> of patches still waiting for review. > > +1 +1 -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Re: [HACKERS] Monitoring roles patch

Hi On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > Dave, > > * Dave Page (dp...@pgadmin.org) wrote: >> OK, so before I start hacking again, here's a proposal based on my >> understanding of folks comments, and so open questions. If I can g

Re: [HACKERS] Monitoring roles patch

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 1:52 PM, Mark Dilger <hornschnor...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Mar 28, 2017, at 9:55 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote: >>>> I don't s

Re: [HACKERS] Monitoring roles patch

? Thanks! On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 1:37 PM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > Greetings, > > * Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote: >> >> I don't see any precedent in the

Re: [HACKERS] Monitoring roles patch

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote: >>> I don't see any precedent in the code for having a hardcoded role, other >>> than >>> superuser, an

Re: [HACKERS] Monitoring roles patch

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Mark Dilger <hornschnor...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Mar 28, 2017, at 8:34 AM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Peter Eisentraut >> <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wro

Re: [HACKERS] Monitoring roles patch

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 3/28/17 11:34, Dave Page wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Peter Eisentraut >> <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>> This patch touches th

Re: [HACKERS] Monitoring roles patch

d some files, but that was fixed within an hour or so in a new version. Right now I'm waiting for discussion to conclude before updating the patch again. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Re: [HACKERS] Monitoring roles patch

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 3:51 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 25 March 2017 at 16:30, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote: > >> I believe this and other reasons we've described are exactly why other DBMS' >> do what we're proposing. > > It

Re: [HACKERS] Monitoring roles patch

Hi > On 25 Mar 2017, at 15:55, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > > Robert, > > * Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote: >>>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 4:

Re: [HACKERS] Monitoring roles patch

ally for cases where there are superuser-only checks at the moment that prevent GRANT? e.g. pg_show_all_settings for SHOW, pg_show_all_stats for pg_tablespace_size and friends, pg_stat_statements for, well, pg_stat_statements and so on? It would be an inferior solution in my opinion, given

[HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix and simplify check for whether we're running as Windows serv

and applied the much less > invasive "V2" patch [1] instead. HEAD is unchanged, so narwhal still fails > there. > > Dave: the consensus is that we no longer support the old version of MinGW > that narwhal is using, for PostgreSQL v 10. Can you modify the > configuration of narwhal to not try building 'master' anymore, or upgrade > the toolchain, please? > I've disabled it. Thanks. -- Dave Page PostgreSQL Core Team http://www.postgresql.org/

Re: [HACKERS] Monitoring roles patch

+6678,12 @@ GetConfigOption(const char *name, bool missing_ok, >> bool restrict_superuser) >> } >> if (restrict_superuser && >> (record->flags & GUC_SUPERUSER_ONLY) && >> - !superuser()) >>

Re: [HACKERS] Monitoring roles patch

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 1:15 PM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: >> >> I did specifically ask for explicit roles to be made to enable such >> capability and that the pg_monitor ro

Re: [HACKERS] Monitoring roles patch

eems like > that's not been done yet. Yeah, sorry - I missed that for pg_stat_activity. I'll update the patch. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailin

Re: [HACKERS] Monitoring roles patch

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 3/22/17 07:48, Dave Page wrote: >> With the patch, complex monitoring systems can easily be setup with >> something like: >> >> CREATE ROLE monitorin

Re: [HACKERS] Monitoring roles patch

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 5:14 AM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote: >> - Adds a default role called pg_monitor >> - Gives members of the pg_monitor role full access to: >>

Re: [HACKERS] Monitoring roles patch

FUNCTION pg_ls_waldir() TO pg_monitor; > + > +GRANT pg_read_all_gucs TO pg_monitor; > > The new status of this patch is: Waiting on Author Odd - I get very different rejects than you. Perhaps you didn't apply my pg_ls_logdir() patch first? In any case, that was committed last nigh

Re: [HACKERS] pg_ls_waldir() & pg_ls_logdir()

On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 7:05 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 6:09 AM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote: >> Hmm, good point. Google seems to be saying there isn't one. Patch >> updated as you suggest (and I've added bac

Re: [HACKERS] pg_ls_waldir() & pg_ls_logdir()

On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:40 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote: >>> +const int n = snprintf(NULL, 0, "%lld", attrib.st_size); > > I wonder what the portab

Re: [HACKERS] pg_ls_waldir() & pg_ls_logdir()

Hi On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote: >> Patch includes the code and doc updates. > > Review: > > +strftime(mtime, 25, "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M

[HACKERS] Monitoring roles patch

+HP+vQ1LtrgbsYQ=cshzzbqyft5joy...@mail.gmail.com). -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company diff --git a/contrib/pg_buffercache/Makefile b/contrib/pg_buffercache/Makefile index 497dbeb229

Re: [HACKERS] pg_monitor role

ade. > - Do not create our own pg_monitor but instead provide > documentation/scripts for users to create their own "monitor" roles. The whole point here is to minimise the requirements on the user, and have a good set of default roles. > It seems at least unlikely that we'l

Re: [HACKERS] pg_monitor role

Hi On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 8:48 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote: >> Further to the patch I just submitted >> (https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BOCxow-X%3

[HACKERS] pg_monitor role

Comments? -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

[HACKERS] pg_ls_waldir() & pg_ls_logdir()

a hard-coded superuser check, but have ACLs that prevent public execution by default. Patch includes the code and doc updates. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company diff --git a/doc/src/sgml

[HACKERS] PostgreSQL Code of Conduct Draft

the mailing lists for comments or suggested changes. If you have comments, please email them to coc-comme...@postgresql.org no later than 2017-03-05, 11:59PM GMT for the committee to review. Regards, Dave. -- Dave Page PostgreSQL Core Team http://www.postgresql.org/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing

Re: [HACKERS] pg_ls_dir & friends still have a hard-coded superuser check

> On 27 Jan 2017, at 17:39, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > > Greetings, > > * Simon Riggs (si...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: >>> On 27 January 2017 at 14:09, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote: >>>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 1:

Re: [HACKERS] pg_ls_dir & friends still have a hard-coded superuser check

On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 27 January 2017 at 12:56, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote: > >> Probably the most common complaint I get from users >> regarding the management & monitoring tools I work on is

Re: [HACKERS] pg_ls_dir & friends still have a hard-coded superuser check

when they > follow the next part which seems like official advice, yet is > potentially unsafe: "access can be given to other users via GRANT". > > 4. Later, work towards a patch. We have some weeks to get this right. > > I'm willing to spend time on workshopping this in

Re: [HACKERS] pg_ls_dir & friends still have a hard-coded superuser check

ement & monitoring tools I work on is that they have to use superuser accounts to get the full benefits, unlike other DBMSs where you can create a role with just the required privileges (or indeed, other DBMSs that ship with such roles pre-defined for convenience). -- Dave Page Blog: http://pg

Re: [HACKERS] Mail thread references in commits

this day. We're far > too invested in the system now, because of how successful it has proved > to be. Right - we go out of our way to ensure we don't break URLs. That's why anoncvs.postgresql.org is still actively maintained for example. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twit

Re: [HACKERS] ICU integration

On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> writes: >> We needed a specific version that was newer than that shipped with >> RHEL 6 (or in EPEL) iirc. > > Sure hope that's not true of the currently-proposed

Re: [HACKERS] ICU integration

the libuci supplied by OS, like we do > for tzdata. > > (That said, just checked EDB's ICU support. We currently ship our own libicu > there, as a part of EPAS, but I don't know the reasoning/history behind > there.) We needed a specific version that was newer than that shipped with RHEL 6 (

Re: [HACKERS] The link to download PostgreSQL 9.6 Beta 2 for Windows X64 is broken (The link downloads Beta 1)

ng/pgdownload#windows There is an issue with the Windows x64 build with the version of VC++ that's used for the installers. I believe there was a fix committed for this yesterday by Tom. The button was supposed to be removed until we get an updated build - apologies for the inconvenience. --

Re: [HACKERS] 10.0

> On 13 May 2016, at 17:24, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > >> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote: >> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> wrote: >> > >> > Well, on

Re: [HACKERS] 10.0

On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 12:05:34PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: >> * Dave Page (dp...@pgadmin.org) wrote: >> > I imagine the bigger issue will be apps that have been written >> > assuming the

Re: [HACKERS] 10.0

released as 8.0 - but is smattered all over pgAdmin 3 for example) - largely because in such apps we're almost always checking for a version greater than or less than x.y. I imagine the bigger issue will be apps that have been written assuming the first part of the version number is only a single digit. --

Re: [HACKERS] Windows 7, Visual Studio 2010: building PgAdmin3

> task. File not found: C:\pgbuild\pgadmin3-jinfroster\pgAdmin3.xml. > C:\pgbuild\pgadmin3-jinfroster\pgAdmin3.targets 45 6 pgAdmin3 Visual Studio seems to delete that file when doing a clean, for reasons I never quite figured out. You can just check it out from the

Re: [HACKERS] Windows 7, Visual Studio 2010: building PgAdmin3

hassle on >> building >> PgAdmin3 using build-wxmsw.bat. > > > If I remember it right for PgAdminIII needed mingw now. > Thanks. pgAdmin III has never supported Mingw, it's always used VC++. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK

Re: [HACKERS] Incomplete startup packet errors

quot;). > > That would get rid of a lot of logspam. > > Would that make sense? Absolutely. It would be very nice to get rid of such noise. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Co

[HACKERS] 9.6 Release Schedule

Per discussion at the Brussels developer meeting and within the release team, the high level schedule for 9.6 will be: Beta: May (before PGCon) Release: September -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Auditing

't have all the cool/modern jsonb support" is also entitled to use either our 9.4 or 9.5 versions which do have JSONB support. Our new versions are typically released within a couple of months of PostgreSQL, and in the case of 9.5, the gap was more like 3 weeks. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgs

Re: [HACKERS] Remove Windows crash dump support?

uently downloaded build from EDB or postgresql.org) as an embedded database in some applications, and for development/test. There are a huge number of Windows PostgreSQL users out there. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Pos

Re: [HACKERS] El Capitan Removes OpenSSL Headers

rwise we wouldn't be able to ensure the same binaries would run on all the different supported versions. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hac

Re: [HACKERS] El Capitan Removes OpenSSL Headers

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 08:53:07AM +0000, Dave Page wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: >> > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 06:40:09PM -0300, Alvaro Herr

Re: Request for dogfood volunteers (was [HACKERS] No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So!)

> On 2 Oct 2015, at 17:28, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > Hello, > > I believe it is pretty obvious we are moving in the direction of having a > tracker at this point. The problem is exactly which direction. Stephen has > offered some resources for his ideas and now I am

Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Implement failover on libpq connect level.

dding ourselves that a > feature that everyone else has and which somebody has taken the time > to implement (thus, obviously it has value for them) and which has > been discussed to general approval at PGCon developer meetings and > which has been endorsed on this thread by three committ

Re: [HACKERS] The purpose of the core team

when they can't for some reason, we (core and packagers) figure out the best date for everyone involved. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql

Re: [HACKERS] RFC: Remove contrib entirely

required to install something like Slony or PostGIS (or both at once) is difficult and unclean? -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers

Re: [HACKERS] RFC: Remove contrib entirely

Really, I use Win 2k8 stuff and Win7 quite a lot. On Win 7 you have to search and install now unsupported VS EE 2010. I've been running 2013 on Windows 7 since it came out. Works perfectly well, and didn't require any unusual installation. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com

Re: [HACKERS] RFC: Remove contrib entirely

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote: On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Guillaume Lelarge guilla...@lelarge.info wrote: Le 29 mai 2015 8:10 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com a écrit : Hi I am not sure if PGXN can substitute contrib - mainly due

Re: [HACKERS] RFC: Remove contrib entirely

extension we ship is pl/debugger. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http

Re: [HACKERS] RFC: Remove contrib entirely

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote: 2015-05-29 10:37 GMT+02:00 Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org: On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote: 2015-05-29 8:20 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Lelarge guilla...@lelarge.info: Le

Re: [HACKERS] problems on Solaris

, any chance you could look into this, or give somebody an account to test what's up? I'm not going to be able to look at this, at least this week. I can give someone on the EDB team access - Robert; can one of your guys take a look? -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake

Re: [HACKERS] pgAdmin4 Bug fix or my Fault ?

ALAN http://sckn.org -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http

Re: [HACKERS] proposal: contrib module - generic command scheduler

pg_scheduled_commands; Comments, notices? It's not integrated with the server (though it is integrated with pgAdmin), but pgAgent provides scheduling services for PostgreSQL already, offering multi-schedule, multi-step job execution. http://www.pgadmin.org/docs/1.20/pgagent.html -- Dave Page Blog

Re: [HACKERS] contrib/fuzzystrmatch/dmetaphone.c license

. This is why I spent nearly a year working on changing pgAdmin to the PostgreSQL licence. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers

Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-packagers] Palle Girgensohn's ICU patch

contributed back. The people I need to speak to are OOO for Thanksgiving at the moment though, so it may be a few days. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-packagers] Palle Girgensohn's ICU patch

a fork and would have to be moved out of the PostgreSQL Core Distribution section of the download area as we only include pure distributions there. -- Dave Page PostgreSQL Core Team http://www.postgresql.org/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes

Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-packagers] Palle Girgensohn's ICU patch

On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Jakob Egger ja...@eggerapps.at wrote: Am 26.11.2014 um 11:05 schrieb Dave Page dp...@postgresql.org: You may want to bear in mind that postgres.app is on the main PG downloads page on the website. If you're patching Postgres to add a feature like

Re: [HACKERS] Getting rid of accept incoming network connections prompts on OS X

-up. I'm on Yosemite. Maybe this was changed. I've never seen it on any version of OS X (I've worked my way from Panther to Yosemite). There must be more to it... -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise

Re: [HACKERS] narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

someone would want to use at present. Does anyone really think there's a good reason to keep maintaining such an obsolete animal? -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql

Re: [HACKERS] RLS feature has been committed

review within N weeks. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http

Re: [HACKERS] RLS feature has been committed

On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote: On 2014-09-23 13:23:32 +0100, Dave Page wrote: Just to be clear here, the *only* issue we should even be discussing is whether the patch should or should not have been committed in the face of those objections. As Josh

Re: [HACKERS] RLS feature has been committed

On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote: Regardless of what Robert may feel, review should only generally be *expected* during a commitfest, but it can be done at any time. Committers are free

Re: [HACKERS] What in the world is happening with castoroides and protosciurus?

On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:17:05AM +0100, Dave Page wrote: On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 1:46 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: For the last month or so, these two buildfarm animals (which I believe are the same physical

Re: [HACKERS] What in the world is happening with castoroides and protosciurus?

, and only has private builds of dependency libraries update periodically (which are not used for the buildfarm). If I had to hazard a guess, I'd suggest this is an early symptom of an old machine which is starting to give up. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB

Re: [HACKERS] Are postgresql-9.4 binaries available on Windows XP?

say that EDB will not be supporting Windows XP for our future builds now that it's been (finally) made obsolete by Microsoft when extended support ended in April. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise

Re: [HACKERS] Possible fix for occasional failures on castoroides etc

On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: On 2014-05-03 13:25:32 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes: On 2012-09-17 08:23:01 -0400, Dave Page wrote: I've added MAX_CONNECTIONS=5 to both Castoroides and Protosciurus. I've

Re: [HACKERS] Sending out a request for more buildfarm animals?

-- Dave Page Chief Architect, Tools Installers EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http

Re: [HACKERS] Securing make check (CVE-2014-0067)

On 2 Mar 2014, at 05:20, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote: On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 05:51:46PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: On 03/01/2014 05:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote: One other thought here: is it actually reasonable to expend a lot of effort on the Windows case? I'm not aware that people

Re: [HACKERS] narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

it for now, and will see what happens. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http

Re: [HACKERS] narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org writes: On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: (BTW, narwhal is evidently not trying to build plpython. I wonder why not?) Not sure - it's certainly installed

Re: [HACKERS] narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org writes: On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: I think we should give serious consideration to desupporting this combination so that we can get rid of the plague

Re: [HACKERS] narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

an MSDN subscription, so can do any versions of Windows or VC++ (and obviously Mingw). -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org

Re: [HACKERS] proposal: hide application_name from other users

to be present and the same on all servers. Otherwise, we make it extremely difficult to build tools like pgAdmin, check_postgres.pl and so on. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via

Re: [HACKERS] Deprecations in authentication

bring everything up again tomorrow (I'm out of town for a couple of days). -- Dave Page PostgreSQL Core Team http://www.postgresql.org/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Re: [HACKERS] Compiling extensions on Windows

@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers

Re: [HACKERS] Compiling extensions on Windows

was suggesting that users could disable NLS in their extension to avoid issues with the missing header, but that's not a good solution. On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote: On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 3:32 AM, Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: Hi all Out

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Service on Windows does not start. ~ is not a valid Win32 application

≫ ・区分：秘密 ・開示：必要最小限で可 ・持出：禁止 ・期限：無期限 ・用済後：廃棄 -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your

[HACKERS] Upcoming backbranch releases

Just a quick heads-up: following discussion within the core team and the packagers, we're planning to wrap tarballs for 8.4 - 9.3 backbranch releases on Monday 7th October for release on Thursday 10th. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http

Re: [HACKERS] Feature Request on Extensions

to that). -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref

Re: [HACKERS] Feature Request on Extensions

On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Dimitri Fontaine dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr wrote: Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org writes: The escalation happens because in a normal system-wide installation of PostgreSQL as you'd see on most production systems will have the installation directories and binaries

Re: [HACKERS] Adding optionally commit number in PG_VERSION_STR

in the past, particularly during QA where people may be testing snapshot builds. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org

Re: [HACKERS] robots.txt on git.postgresql.org

pages would likely expire from the cache before it really saved us anything. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org

Re: [HACKERS] Configurable location for extension .control files

help these users (who doubtless don't know it exists) but what we do these days is drop a pg_env.sh file in the installation directory that the user can source to set their PATH and various PG* environment variables when they need/want to. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter

Re: [HACKERS] pg_rewind, a tool for resynchronizing an old master after failover

as disadvantages, in having the copyright rest with the original contributors. Mostly, it prevents relicensing of the whole project. No it doesn't - it just makes it a pain in the arse (I know, I've done it). -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http

[HACKERS] Implicit rule created for materialized views

, + pg_class.relacl, + pg_class.reloptions+ FROM pg_class; (1 row) -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Re: [HACKERS] Implicit rule created for materialized views

time in the future. On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 6:58 AM, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote: Hi In playing with materialized views, I noticed that they still seem to have an _RETURN rule implicitly created like a regular view. This doesn't seem right to me - is there a reason? viper:~ dpage$ /usr

Re: [HACKERS] Implicit rule created for materialized views

On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Kevin Grittner kgri...@ymail.com wrote: Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote: Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@enterprisedb.com wrote: Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote: In playing with materialized views, I noticed that they still seem to have an _RETURN rule

Re: [HACKERS] improving PL/Python builds on OS X

On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 2:47 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote: On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 10:11 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: On 5/9/13 3:25 AM, Dave Page wrote: BTW - it's always worked fine for us on 64 bit machines with the past few major releases of both PG and Python - are you

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >