Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?

2003-11-19 Thread Nick Fankhauser
Least interesting to many user perhaps, but lost of them seen to think that it's important for expanding our userbase: http://www.postgresql.org/survey.php?View=1SurveyID=9 That does not say that better entertainment will attract new viewers, just that the existing viewers think

Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL JDBC and sub-select

2002-11-10 Thread Nick Fankhauser
You could set up query logging in the backend and see what the offending query is. It may still be something you did (a missing or extra something somewhere). How ? These settings have worked for me in a similar situation: (pulled from the admin list archives) snip My goal was to get

Re: [HACKERS] Script to compute random page cost

2002-09-09 Thread Nick Fankhauser
Bruce- With the change in the script that I mentioned to you off-list (which I believe just pointed it at our real world data), I got the following results with 6 successive runs on each of our two development platforms: (We're running PGSQL 7.2.1 on Debian Linux 2.4) System 1: 1.2 GHz Athlon

Re: [HACKERS] Script to compute random page cost

2002-09-09 Thread Nick Fankhauser
1. I can't see anything obviously wrong with the script, but something very odd is going. -Nick -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Nick Fankhauser Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:25 AM To: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development Cc