that -- because I'd
like to know what we can do to get some documentation included in the
next release. I don't feel that having zero documentation on this
subject is acceptable.
Are you saying here you _do_ have some documentation to contribute?
--
Nigel J. Andrews
---(end
FORTRAN does to
one's brain after a while of trying to read it.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it with
postgresql.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
Darcy Buskermolen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On November 28, 2003 12:33 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
Whoa. Try the following test program. Then send it in to your friendly
local BSD hackers
I've been running this code on a pair of FreeBSD (i386) boxen,
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
Nigel J. Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On an Intel Linux 2.4.18 I get them quite often, 25 in 1'45, but they
are all just a microsecond.
What do you mean by just a microsecond?
I mean it's always a out of order tv_usec... line and the difference
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
Nigel J. Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
Nigel J. Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On an Intel Linux 2.4.18 I get them quite often, 25 in 1'45, but they
are all just a microsecond.
What do you mean by just
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
Nigel J. Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
$ time ./a.out 21 | tee a.txt
out of order tv_sec: 1070066197 273140, prev 1070066195 721010
out of order tv_usec: 1070066197 273140, prev 1070066195 721010
out of order tv_sec: 1070067322 116061, prev
On Sun, 23 Nov 2003, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
does tsearch2 in 7.4 still has the problem ? I apologies if we miss your
patches but certainly we're interested in clear explanation of the problem.
The problem was memory allocations made through malloc and family were not
being checked for failure
On 19 Nov 2003, Robert Treat wrote:
I don't think *we* thought it was a hot button issue.. at least I
certainly didn't when I initially responded. There is no need for you to
apologize, in fact, I'll apologize for the list, we sometimes get a
little heated on -hackers. Hopefully you've not
However, I would love to see those patches.
Sure. Should be in the archive. The version for 7.4 was submitted and applied
pre-release but if you really do want the 7.3 runnable stuff I can send it. It
was only the unchecked returns from malloc and family patch in the snowball
directory. I
Oops, sorry folks. That was only meant to go to Joshua.
On Sat, 22 Nov 2003, Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
However, I would love to see those patches.
Sure. Should be in the archive. The version for 7.4 was submitted and applied
...
---(end of broadcast
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Michael Meskes wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 04:19:35PM -0600, Austin Gonyou wrote:
I've been looking all over but I can't seem to see a company that is
providing *up-to-date* postgresql
those messages?
Similar sort of question to the 'Does anyone read any of those popup boxes
produced by everything in Windows before hitting OK?' one.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Gevik Babakhani wrote:
Dear PostgreSQL masters,
I know this might look like a childish question and you
probably might have a good laugh over this but I
would like to learn how PostgreSQL works inside-out.
Could anyone please give me some pointers of where to start
was running a 7.3 series server but wanted the nifty features
of tsearch2 instead of tsearch, would you expect all people upgrading within
the stable 7.3 branch for bug fixes to be forced to use tsearch2 and not
tsearch?
--
Nigel J. Andrews
---(end of broadcast
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
So a db designer made a bloody mistake.
The problem is there's no easy way to find out what's missing.
I'd really like EXPLAIN to display all subsequent triggered queries
also, to see the full scans caused by missing indexes.
I'd
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
OK, the thread test program is read for platform testing,
src/tools/thread_test. You will find the README, Makefile tests, and
program output to be very clear and almost error-proof.
Please run it on platforms we support and report back. Thanks.
.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
that.
But it can if you switch to one of the other languages like plpgsql, which
isn't terribly complicated but does require the language to be installed in the
database.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7: don't forget to increase
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
I never knew running indent was so damn complicated. All three of my
development systems can not manage it without throughing a fault
...
There are about 6 files that can't be run through pgindent, and tsearch2
has
been there, and specifically placed there, for nearly 2 years.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
#!/bin/sh
echo
echo -n Path=
echo $PATH
echo
# Known bugs:
#
# Blank line is added after, seen as a function definition, no space
# after *:
# y = (int) x *y;
trap rm -f /tmp/$$ /tmp/$$a 0 1 2 3 15
entab
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
There was a simple change commited in revision 1.47 of pgindent, listed as
being More updates for GNU indent.
The questions are: why? and surely I can't be the only one whose hit this
problem since November 2001?
...
I also had to apply
[I'm not convinced this is a -hackers issue so have cross posted to -general in
the expectation followups will go there]
I also didn't feel there was much I could cut from the earlier posts without
losing relevent info, so I didn't. Sorry.
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, chakkara rangarajan wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Francisco Figueiredo Jr. wrote:
Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Francisco Figueiredo Jr. wrote:
How's this for an alternative if you really don't want any rows returned:
create function fincF ( ) returns setof integer as '
begin
delete from
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
Oleg Bartunov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK. I'll suggest people to try new tsearch2 in README file of old
tsearch.
Okay, that works for me. Please patch the old tsearch README file in
both HEAD and REL7_3_STABLE branch as soon as possible --- we are
/tmp or other partitions? Maybe
a set of other directories could be designated for this purpose?
Hope this help... at least to add new items to the postgresql todo list;-)
Have a nice day,
--
Nigel J. Andrews
---(end of broadcast
delete from blah;
return null;
end;
' as language 'plpgsql';
select * from funcF();
I believe that would work but don't quote me :)
--
Nigel J. Andrews
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
;
' language 'plpgsql';
--
Nigel J. Andrews
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
exactly that. Doesn't even return a null. Give it a quick
go, skip the delete statement obviously, and see. You'll get something like:
?
---
(0 rows)
--
Nigel J. Andrews
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
VERBOSE doesn't seem like the right name for the \set parameter.
VERBOSITY would be okay with me.
Sounds meaningful. I often want to say 'verbosity level' when talking such
things.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
. Error codes are always handy to have and the extra details are just
the ticket, I especially like the hint.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs
, if the testing is not
upto your level of testing submit something that makes it so. Having said that
I do believe you mentioned that you didn't have the time to create something
but you would be happy to test it, i.e. test the test.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
---(end
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Maybe a better strategy would be to get a release out soon but not wait
6 months for another release which would contain the Win32 port and the
PITR stuff (assuming those aren't done in time for
the start of this thread so I've probably
missed the reason for the complaint about lack of swap space, like a problem on
a small memory system.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: most folks find a random_page_cost between 1 or 2
On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
Josh Berkus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hey, I'm looking at the postgresql.conf.sample in CVS, and can't find the
option that's supposed to let you turn off Inserting missing FROM clause for
table ...
Bruce hasn't applied that patch yet. I believe
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
Nigel J. Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How do people feel about changing matching for host and hostssl to be such that
a plain host line in pg_hba.conf does not allow a SSL connection but requires
the hostssl specifier?
Then there would be no way
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
Nigel J. Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Now, I did a little bit of testing and when doing a \lo_export oid
filename in psql connected via localhost a SIGPIPE is generated in
write() in libc and psql quit, without printing any message to the
terminal
been lost in a hole
somewhere much like another of my posts.
On Sun, 8 Jun 2003, Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
Note, primary list address changed to -general, I'd suggest any followups
remove the -hackers, which I've left in just for 'closure'.
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Nigel J. Andrews wrote
Note, primary list address changed to -general, I'd suggest any followups
remove the -hackers, which I've left in just for 'closure'.
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
Nigel J. Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Now, I did a little bit
, a) is this known? b) what is it? c) is it not going to happen in the new
protocol? and d) does anyone care?
--
Nigel J. Andrews
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
are dangerous, they turn you mind off.
I voted for setting 'C' by default.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
that the autocommit is
turned off.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
.
The workaround shown here is acceptable as I don't really need a compound
primary key. But If I need, I know it won't work..
I hope that helps.
TIA..
Shridhar
--
Nigel J. Andrews
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9
simplifies switching between versions of software, try doing that if your
config is /etc/postgresql/postgres.conf.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
a field? :)
Thanks,
Paul
I don't know but large objects are stored in the filesystem so I presume any
limit is going to apply there. A large object isn't a field, the large object
id can, and very probably should, be stored in one though.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
---(end
throwing an error if an all digit user name is given to create
user as already alluded to?
Seems that would be simple, not that I know anything about the parser, but does
that break any standards?
--
Nigel J. Andrews
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have
applies to the pserver method.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
certainly
remember some discussion on this subject a few months ago.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
that let's hope I haven't embarrassed myself.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
FWIW, a search on Google gives some hits for the name on the lists this
year.
First impressions are that it's not Sir Mondred (or whatever the spelling was).
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Justin Clift wrote:
Hi Chris,
Just received this from them. Look like he was trying to claim stuff
that
will be drafted in 2 days.
If you have something to say, please e-mail me, Marc ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
and Justin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) off-list so we can quote you!
I think it's great - but don't quote me on that. :)
--
Nigel J. Andrews
---(end of broadcast
upgrades or anything. Now of
course one would need a new bison.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can
operation either exceeded
legal ranges
or was a divide by zero
SELECT '' AS bad, f.f1 ^ '1e200' from FLOAT8_TBL f;
ERROR: pow() result is out of range
SELECT '' AS bad, ln(f.f1) from FLOAT8_TBL f where f.f1 = '0.0' ;
in the float8 test.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
Logictree Systems Limited
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
Nigel J. Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FWIW, gmake check and gmake bigcheck pass on:
FreeBSD 3.3-RELEASE #3: Thu Feb 3 23:48:56 GMT 2000
with the expection of:
[snipped]
in the float8 test.
Okay, looks like we need to use float8-fp
very
closely but nothing jumped out at me as being obviously wrong from the grep
output.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
paragraph. Can't we get Sir
Mongle (or whatever the name was) to test these things under the auspices of
them being DoS attacks?
--
Nigel J. Andrews
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
still had an obvious memory
leak so looked a little closer at SPI.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 19 Oct 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
Nigel J. Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The leak is that memory is grabbed in SPI_prepare() for a plan within
whatever context is current when it does the palloc(). It may be the
caller's or it may be the relevent SPI one. The plan is then copied
about internationalisation and that test.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through
with the anoncvs archive?
--
Nigel J. Andrews
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
cvs diff -r HEAD pltcl.c
gave me differences against revision 1.64
and cvs update pltcl.c
said it was merging changes between 1.64 and 1.61
and a plain cvs diff now shows me differences against 1.64
I
type?
If you want to select on NULL, whether or not you think the database is more
intelligent than you in determining what you really want, then write your query
to select on NULL. The chances are your database is not actually a mind reader.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
On 25 Sep 2002, Neil Conway wrote:
Nigel J. Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, I do get the similar results.
A quick investigation shows that the SPI_freetuptable at the end of
pltcl_SPI_exec is trying to free a tuptable of value 0x82ebe64
(which looks sensible to me) but which
that
I've straightened this out in my brain a bit more.
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
On 25 Sep 2002, Neil Conway wrote:
Nigel J. Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, I do get the similar results.
A quick investigation shows that the SPI_freetuptable at the end
that test
function wrong, it's got a level of nesting.
Unfortunately, I am currently trying to throw together a quick demo of
something at the moment so can't investigate too fully for the next day or so.
If someone wants to pick this up feel free otherwise I'll look into it later.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
configurable --- it was just the notion of making it depend
on environment variables that scared people.
And it's obvious it was centred on the use of an environment variable from the
subject line, it's still got PGXLOG in capitals in it.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
---(end
on
the hardware. On the other hand I do believe I saw a message recently saying
that some of the 2.4 series kernels had file system bugs. I don't know which,
someone else might be able to expand.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't
. That's 1 second
(approx.) per row retrieved. That is pretty dire for an index scan. The
data/index must be very non unique.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
there might be another leak with
prepared plans. I'm looking into that so I won't be sending this patch just
yet.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
warnings. Can anyone comment on the correctness of this?
Reversing my changes doesn't really help matters so I presume it is something
else that is causing the different behaviour.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
Ian
the day before beta freeze.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
Director
---
Logictree Systems Limited
Computer Consultants
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
shows
a lack of tuptable freeing.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
is that going to work if tablespaces are introduced in 7.4. Surely
the same mechanism for tablespaces would be used for pg_xlog. As the tablespace
mechanism hasn't been determined yet, as far as I know, wouldn't it be best to
see what happens there before creating the TODO item for the log?
--
Nigel J
email and work load.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
Director
---
Logictree Systems Limited
Computer Consultants
/*
* Derived from tablefunc.c, a sample to demonstrate C functions which
* return setof scalar and setof composite by Joe Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Copyright 2002 by PostgreSQL
It's probably a pretty basic question explained in some document I haven't seen
but...if I do something like a CreateTupleDescCopy() how do I know my memory
context owns everything allocated without following the code all the way
through until it returns to me?
--
Nigel J. Andrews
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Karel Zak wrote:
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 12:28:37PM +0100, Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
It's probably a pretty basic question explained in some document I haven't seen
but...if I do something like a CreateTupleDescCopy() how do I know my memory
context owns everything
at the moment.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
Director
---
Logictree Systems Limited
Computer Consultants
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Gavin Sherry wrote:
On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
When is the beta freeze?
Today.
Oops, my fault for being imprecise.
I was wondering what time of day with timezone. Someone suggested end of today
but that means different times to different people
On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Gavin Sherry wrote:
On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
When is the beta freeze?
Today.
Oops, my fault for being imprecise.
I was wondering what
it.
Disclaimer: I have no idea what I'm doing here.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
somedir some spec. | xargs grep
often followed by tags in Emacs.
It isn't perfect but then I'm not either.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
Director
---
Logictree Systems Limited
Computer Consultants
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
Nigel J. Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
+ if (!superuser() MyBackendId MaxBackends - ReservedBackends)
+ elog(ERROR, Normal user limit exceeded);
This coding is wrong on its face: the slot number you happen to find has
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Nigel J. Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was taking the line that the last slots in the array are
reserved. Those are not going to be taken by non su connections.
But that doesn't do the job, does it? My view
.
For the record, this is related to reserving the last few backend slots for the
superuser and I just need to test what I've done.
TIA
--
Nigel J. Andrews
Director
---
Logictree Systems Limited
Computer Consultants
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can
Helps if I attach the patch...
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 14:36:19 +0100 (BST)
From: Nigel J. Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: A configure.in patch check
Would someone apply the attached patch to the development source and let me
On Sun, 25 Aug 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
Nigel J. Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
+ AC_MSG_CHECKING([for default superuser reserved number of connections])
+ PGAC_ARG_REQ(with, reservedbackends, [ --with-reservedbackends=Nset default
superuser reserved number of connections [2
record on pg_type? That presumably means we'd need in and out functions defined
for these, which in the case of cstring would just be copying the input to
output?
(As you can see I may not be the best person to work on this if it is to be
available for the beta)
--
Nigel J. Andrews
Director
input types, i.e. not cash_out(opaque)? cash_words is
already listed as only taking the money type is cash_out really that different?
On a related topic cash_out() is listed in pg_proc as returning an int4 but
doesn't the code clearly show that is incorrect?
--
Nigel J. Andrews
Director
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
Nigel J. Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd like to see something done about this fairly soon, but it's not
happening for 7.3 ...
Does anyone have an idea about what other functions are affected by this?
As a first approximation, every output
systems like Win32.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
Director
---
Logictree Systems Limited
Computer Consultants
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.]
--
Nigel J. Andrews
Director
---
Logictree Systems Limited
Computer Consultants
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
Director
---
Logictree Systems Limited
Computer Consultants
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
, I'm going to shut up now before I really do show my
ignorance and let you answer.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
Director
---
Logictree Systems Limited
Computer Consultants
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send
?
--
Nigel J. Andrews
Director
---
Logictree Systems Limited
Computer Consultants
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
software13288 Jul 27 21:10 Makefile.global.in
-rw-r--r--1 software software10853 Jul 27 21:10 Makefile.shlib
drwxr-xr-x 23 software software 4096 Aug 1 23:27 backend
--
Nigel J. Andrews
Director
---
Logictree Systems Limited
Computer Consultants
---(end
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Tom Lane dijo:
Nigel J. Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However, because PERFORM discards the results of a query it is only
useful for side effects of the query.
Okay. I guess the next question is whether PERFORM *should* be setting
with the baddies from the first paragraph :)
--
Nigel J. Andrews
Director
---
Logictree Systems Limited
Computer Consultants
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send unregister
the
documentation. I'm also a bit of a newbie when it comes to SSH and I've not
investigated ssh3 at all yet. However, isn't this assuming ssh1 only? I know
ssh2 will fallback to ssh1 compatibility but should there be something about
configuring for the later versions?
--
Nigel J. Andrews
Director
[My apolgies if this turns up in the lists twice (now three times) but my
mailer claims it's been in the queue for them too long. Not sure why it
thinks that since it's only a few minutes since I sent it.]
On Fri, 17 May 2002, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Nigel J. Andrews writes
a bug fix and is therefore for 7.3 not 7.2.2
--
Nigel J. Andrews
Director
---
Logictree Systems Limited
Computer Consultants
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
