On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay, patch attached.
Committed.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
On 16 April 2012 17:21, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
No, that's not what I was referring to. If you don't have a standby
(i.e. a single, isolated database cluster with no replication), and
its synchronous_commit is
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 16 April 2012 17:21, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
No, that's not what I was referring to. If you don't have a standby
(i.e. a single, isolated
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 14 April 2012 15:58, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 4:16 AM, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
I have a question though. What happens when this is set to write
(or remote_write as proposed)
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 4:57 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
guilla...@lelarge.info wrote:
On 04/13/2012 08:15 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Robert Haasrobertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
In my view, remote_write seems a lot more clear than write
+1
I sure didn't understand it to mean remote_write when I
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 4:57 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
guilla...@lelarge.info wrote:
On 04/13/2012 08:15 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Robert Haasrobertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
In my view, remote_write seems a lot more clear
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 4:16 AM, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 13 April 2012 19:15, Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
In my view, remote_write seems a lot more clear than write
+1
I sure didn't understand it to mean
On 14 April 2012 15:58, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 4:16 AM, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
I have a question though. What happens when this is set to write
(or remote_write as proposed) but it's being used on a standalone
primary? At the moment it's
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 1:21 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that this would be a lot more clear if we described this as
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
In my view, remote_write seems a lot more clear than write
+1
I sure didn't understand it to mean remote_write when I read the
subject line.
-Kevin
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
On 13 April 2012 19:15, Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
In my view, remote_write seems a lot more clear than write
+1
I sure didn't understand it to mean remote_write when I read the
subject line.
Whatever this option value is
On 04/13/2012 08:15 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Robert Haasrobertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
In my view, remote_write seems a lot more clear than write
+1
I sure didn't understand it to mean remote_write when I read the
subject line.
Neither did I. So definitely +1.
--
Guillaume
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 1:23 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Jaime Casanova ja...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Add new replication mode synchronous_commit = 'write'.
Replication
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that this would be a lot more clear if we described this as
synchronous_commit = remote_write rather than just synchronous_commit
= write. Actually, the internal constant is named that way already,
but it's not
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that this would be a lot more clear if we described this as
synchronous_commit = remote_write rather than just synchronous_commit
=
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Jaime Casanova ja...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Add new replication mode synchronous_commit = 'write'.
Replication occurs only to memory on standby, not to disk,
so provides additional
16 matches
Mail list logo
