Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
At 2008-09-22 12:54:34 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can we tell there is consensus in create a new has_sequence_privilege()?
Abhijit will you make it? if not i can make a try...
Yes, I'll do it.
This hasn't been done so I added it to the TODO list.
--
At 2008-09-22 12:54:34 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can we tell there is consensus in create a new has_sequence_privilege()?
Abhijit will you make it? if not i can make a try...
Yes, I'll do it.
-- ams
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 10:55 PM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Abhijit Menon-Sen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(I can't help but think that the USAGE privilege is a bit unfortunate.
If granting SELECT rights allowed currval(), INSERT allowed nextval(),
and UPDATE allowed nextval() and
Maybe we want a new function has_sequence_privilege() instead?
+1
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
At 2008-09-06 19:59:55 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I'm thinking it would be better to invent a has_sequence_privilege
family of functions.
Perhaps.
I certainly wouldn't object to that approach. If there had been such a
function, I would have used it; and, since has_table_privilege
Abhijit Menon-Sen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(I can't help but think that the USAGE privilege is a bit unfortunate.
If granting SELECT rights allowed currval(), INSERT allowed nextval(),
and UPDATE allowed nextval() and setval(), then has_table_privilege()
would have been sufficient and there
Jaime Casanova [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 3:08 AM, Abhijit Menon-Sen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just noticed, to my dismay, that has_table_privilege() does not allow
me to check for usage privileges on sequences.
Maybe we want a new function has_sequence_privilege()
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 3:08 AM, Abhijit Menon-Sen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just noticed, to my dismay, that has_table_privilege() does not allow
me to check for usage privileges on sequences.
Maybe we want a new function has_sequence_privilege() instead?
--
regards,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte
I just noticed, to my dismay, that has_table_privilege() does not allow
me to check for usage privileges on sequences. I suspect this may have
been an oversight. If so, the attached patch fixes it for me.
-- ams
*** a/src/backend/utils/adt/acl.c
--- b/src/backend/utils/adt/acl.c
***
