Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 status

2003-10-03 Thread Alvaro Herrera
While reviewing someone else's translation of pg_dump I noted that the phrase ACL list is used in a couple of places. However ACL stands for Access Control List, so the term ACL list seems redundant. Maybe it should be replaced with plain ACL? -- Alvaro Herrera (alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl) I

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 status

2003-10-03 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Alvaro Herrera writes: While reviewing someone else's translation of pg_dump I noted that the phrase ACL list is used in a couple of places. However ACL stands for Access Control List, so the term ACL list seems redundant. These kinds of redundancies are pretty common for the sake of clarity

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 status

2003-10-02 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Alvaro Herrera writes: The only things left that I can see are #: commands/tablecmds.c:4093 msgid tables \%s\ already has a TOAST table tables - table Fixed. #: commands/user.c:651 commands/user.c:1357 msgid sysid %d is already assigned sysid - user ID? Not sure, maybe it can be a

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 status

2003-10-02 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Patrick Welche writes: Does this count a string change? :) Yes, but it's also a documentation bug fix. Anyway, you got it in before the freeze. :) -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 status

2003-10-01 Thread Patrick Welche
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 11:50:23PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Tom Lane writes: At the very least we need to set a strings freeze soon, so the translators can catch up. Peter, are you getting close to done with the message revisions you've been making? Yes, I think we're ready for

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 status

2003-09-30 Thread Hannu Krosing
Bruce Momjian kirjutas T, 30.09.2003 kell 02:16: Tom Lane wrote: ! Faster regular expression code We could tout more functionality too, since the new regex package has a lot of advanced stuff that wasn't there before. Added more powerful This wording covers nicely

[HACKERS] 7.4 status

2003-09-29 Thread Bruce Momjian
I have emptied the patch queue, and have updated the HISTORY file for 7.4. I am looking for any improvements to that file. (I have to move it to SGML soon.) Perhaps it is time to start looking at a final release date for 7.4? -- Bruce Momjian|

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 status

2003-09-29 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Perhaps it is time to start looking at a final release date for 7.4? At the very least we need to set a strings freeze soon, so the translators can catch up. Peter, are you getting close to done with the message revisions you've been making?

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 status

2003-09-29 Thread Marc G. Fournier
Should we maybe get a Beta4 out now that everything is caught up code wise? Is anyone still sitting on something (other then the translations stuff) that should be in v7.4? On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Perhaps it is time to start looking at a

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 status

2003-09-29 Thread Tom Lane
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Should we maybe get a Beta4 out now that everything is caught up code wise? Is anyone still sitting on something (other then the translations stuff) that should be in v7.4? We still have several open items in Bruce's list, but maybe we can resolve

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 status

2003-09-29 Thread Neil Conway
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 14:57, Bruce Momjian wrote: I have emptied the patch queue, and have updated the HISTORY file for 7.4. I am looking for any improvements to that file. (I have to move it to SGML soon.) A patch that improves HISTORY is attached. I added a few bullet items to the

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 status

2003-09-29 Thread Bruce Momjian
Patch applied. Thanks. --- Neil Conway wrote: On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 14:57, Bruce Momjian wrote: I have emptied the patch queue, and have updated the HISTORY file for 7.4. I am looking for any improvements to that

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 status

2003-09-29 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Tom Lane writes: At the very least we need to set a strings freeze soon, so the translators can catch up. Peter, are you getting close to done with the message revisions you've been making? Yes, I think we're ready for a string freeze. Alvaro, do you have anything you still want to submit

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 status

2003-09-29 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 11:50:23PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Tom Lane writes: At the very least we need to set a strings freeze soon, so the translators can catch up. Peter, are you getting close to done with the message revisions you've been making? Yes, I think we're ready for

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 status

2003-09-29 Thread Tom Lane
Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: SSL ! Major improvements in SSL performance and security Did we actually add any security to the SSL code? Performance and reliability, maybe, but I didn't think we'd done anything to the security algorithms per se. Did I miss something?

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 status

2003-09-29 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: SSL ! Major improvements in SSL performance and security Did we actually add any security to the SSL code? Performance and reliability, maybe, but I didn't think we'd done anything to the security algorithms per se.