While reviewing someone else's translation of pg_dump I noted that the
phrase ACL list is used in a couple of places. However ACL stands for
Access Control List, so the term ACL list seems redundant.
Maybe it should be replaced with plain ACL?
--
Alvaro Herrera (alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl)
I
Alvaro Herrera writes:
While reviewing someone else's translation of pg_dump I noted that the
phrase ACL list is used in a couple of places. However ACL stands for
Access Control List, so the term ACL list seems redundant.
These kinds of redundancies are pretty common for the sake of clarity
Alvaro Herrera writes:
The only things left that I can see are
#: commands/tablecmds.c:4093
msgid tables \%s\ already has a TOAST table
tables - table
Fixed.
#: commands/user.c:651 commands/user.c:1357
msgid sysid %d is already assigned
sysid - user ID? Not sure, maybe it can be a
Patrick Welche writes:
Does this count a string change? :)
Yes, but it's also a documentation bug fix.
Anyway, you got it in before the freeze. :)
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 11:50:23PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Tom Lane writes:
At the very least we need to set a strings freeze soon, so the
translators can catch up. Peter, are you getting close to done with the
message revisions you've been making?
Yes, I think we're ready for
Bruce Momjian kirjutas T, 30.09.2003 kell 02:16:
Tom Lane wrote:
! Faster regular expression code
We could tout more functionality too, since the new regex package
has a lot of advanced stuff that wasn't there before.
Added more powerful
This wording covers nicely
I have emptied the patch queue, and have updated the HISTORY file for
7.4. I am looking for any improvements to that file. (I have to move
it to SGML soon.)
Perhaps it is time to start looking at a final release date for 7.4?
--
Bruce Momjian|
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Perhaps it is time to start looking at a final release date for 7.4?
At the very least we need to set a strings freeze soon, so the
translators can catch up. Peter, are you getting close to done with the
message revisions you've been making?
Should we maybe get a Beta4 out now that everything is caught up code
wise? Is anyone still sitting on something (other then the translations
stuff) that should be in v7.4?
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Perhaps it is time to start looking at a
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Should we maybe get a Beta4 out now that everything is caught up code
wise? Is anyone still sitting on something (other then the translations
stuff) that should be in v7.4?
We still have several open items in Bruce's list, but maybe we can
resolve
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 14:57, Bruce Momjian wrote:
I have emptied the patch queue, and have updated the HISTORY file for
7.4. I am looking for any improvements to that file. (I have to move
it to SGML soon.)
A patch that improves HISTORY is attached. I added a few bullet items to
the
Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Neil Conway wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 14:57, Bruce Momjian wrote:
I have emptied the patch queue, and have updated the HISTORY file for
7.4. I am looking for any improvements to that
Tom Lane writes:
At the very least we need to set a strings freeze soon, so the
translators can catch up. Peter, are you getting close to done with the
message revisions you've been making?
Yes, I think we're ready for a string freeze. Alvaro, do you have
anything you still want to submit
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 11:50:23PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Tom Lane writes:
At the very least we need to set a strings freeze soon, so the
translators can catch up. Peter, are you getting close to done with the
message revisions you've been making?
Yes, I think we're ready for
Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
SSL
! Major improvements in SSL performance and security
Did we actually add any security to the SSL code? Performance and
reliability, maybe, but I didn't think we'd done anything to the
security algorithms per se. Did I miss something?
Tom Lane wrote:
Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
SSL
! Major improvements in SSL performance and security
Did we actually add any security to the SSL code? Performance and
reliability, maybe, but I didn't think we'd done anything to the
security algorithms per se.
16 matches
Mail list logo