Hi everyone,
I'm trying to mark a GiST index as lossy using the RECHECK operator as
part of some work on PostGIS, but what happens is that the original
operator function is never reapplied to the results of the index scan.
The operator class and operator definitions looks like this:
CREATE
Mark Cave-Ayland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm trying to mark a GiST index as lossy using the RECHECK operator as
part of some work on PostGIS, but what happens is that the original
operator function is never reapplied to the results of the index scan.
You sure? I'm pretty sure that a number
To: Mark Cave-Ayland
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Can get GiST RECHECK clause to work
Mark Cave-Ayland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm trying to mark a GiST index as lossy using the RECHECK
operator as
part of some work on PostGIS, but what happens is that the original
Mark Cave-Ayland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As far as I can tell this is the case. What I've done to test this is to
put an elog(NOTICE, .) in geometry_overlap()
Well, I can easily prove that CVS tip does call the operator function
and honor its result.
regression=# create table foo (f1
