Re: [HACKERS] Continuous integration on Windows?

On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 3:08 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > I'll add some info to the wiki. Unfortunately, the tests fail on the > tablespace test because they are running as a privileged user. We need > to find a way around that, still looking into it. (See >

Re: [HACKERS] Continuous integration on Windows?

Oups what a silly boy, I didn't saw that pg10 was released ;o( That's all I need soon (to test Declarative partitioning). Thanks for taking time to answer me in a so detailled and interesting manner. Regards PAscal -- Sent from:

Re: [HACKERS] Continuous integration on Windows?

On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Thomas Munro wrote: > On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 7:47 AM, legrand legrand > wrote: >> Is it stored somewhere to permit to users like me >> that want to test pg 10 on windows >> without having to build it ?

Re: [HACKERS] Continuous integration on Windows?

On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 7:47 AM, legrand legrand wrote: > This may seems obvious for you > > but where is the build result ? Each CI platform has a web page corresponding to your GitHub/BitBucket/... user account that lists builds results. You can also get

Re: [HACKERS] Continuous integration on Windows?

This may seems obvious for you but where is the build result ? Is it stored somewhere to permit to users like me that want to test pg 10 on windows without having to build it ? Regards PAscal -- Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-hackers-f1928748.html -- Sent via

Re: [HACKERS] Continuous integration on Windows?

On 10/13/2017 08:09 AM, Thomas Munro wrote: > On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Andrew Dunstan > wrote: >> Well, as you can see here the appveyor.yml file can live outside the >> tree that's being built. > Here's a Wiki page where I hope we can collect how-to

Re: [HACKERS] Continuous integration on Windows?

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Well, as you can see here the appveyor.yml file can live outside the > tree that's being built. Here's a Wiki page where I hope we can collect how-to information on this general topic:

Re: [HACKERS] Continuous integration on Windows?

On 10/12/2017 06:46 PM, Thomas Munro wrote: > On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Andrew Dunstan > wrote: >> Actually, that didn't take too long. >> >> No testing yet, but this runs a build successfully: >>

Re: [HACKERS] Continuous integration on Windows?

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Actually, that didn't take too long. > > No testing yet, but this runs a build successfully: > > > See results at

Re: [HACKERS] Continuous integration on Windows?

On 2017-10-12 17:57:11 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > No testing yet, but this runs a build successfully: > > > See results at "Time Elapsed 00:04:36.37" I'd expected

Re: [HACKERS] Continuous integration on Windows?

On 10/12/2017 04:14 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > On 10/11/2017 11:04 PM, Thomas Munro wrote: >> Hi hackers, >> >> I don't use Windows myself, but I'd rather avoid submitting patches >> that fail to build, build with horrible warnings or blow up on that >> fine operating system. I think it

Re: [HACKERS] Continuous integration on Windows?

On 10/11/2017 11:04 PM, Thomas Munro wrote: > Hi hackers, > > I don't use Windows myself, but I'd rather avoid submitting patches > that fail to build, build with horrible warnings or blow up on that > fine operating system. I think it would be neat to be able to have > experimental branches of

[HACKERS] Continuous integration on Windows?

Hi hackers, I don't use Windows myself, but I'd rather avoid submitting patches that fail to build, build with horrible warnings or blow up on that fine operating system. I think it would be neat to be able to have experimental branches of PostgreSQL built and tested on Windows automatically