Re: [HACKERS] Exclude pg_largeobject form pg_dump

2016-11-29 Thread Guillaume Lelarge
2016-11-29 17:12 GMT+01:00 Stephen Frost : > Guillaume, Amul, > > * Amul Sul (sula...@gmail.com) wrote: > > The following review has been posted through the commitfest application: > > make installcheck-world: tested, passed > > Implements feature: tested, passed > >

Re: [HACKERS] Exclude pg_largeobject form pg_dump

2016-11-29 Thread Stephen Frost
Guillaume, Amul, * Amul Sul (sula...@gmail.com) wrote: > The following review has been posted through the commitfest application: > make installcheck-world: tested, passed > Implements feature: tested, passed > Spec compliant: not tested > Documentation:tested, passed

Re: [HACKERS] Exclude pg_largeobject form pg_dump

2016-11-16 Thread Amul Sul
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application: make installcheck-world: tested, passed Implements feature: tested, passed Spec compliant: not tested Documentation:tested, passed Patch v6 looks good to me, passing to committer. Thanks ! The

Re: [HACKERS] Exclude pg_largeobject form pg_dump

2016-11-03 Thread amul sul
Kindly ignore this, i've added this note to original thread. Sorry for noise. Regards, Amul -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Re: [HACKERS] Exclude pg_largeobject form pg_dump

2016-11-03 Thread amul sul
Hi Guillaume, With your v2 patch, -B options working as expected but --no-blobs options is still unrecognized, this happens is because of you have forgot to add entry for 'no-blobs' in long_options[] array. Apart from this concern patch looks good to me. Thanks Regards, Amul -- Sent via