Re: [HACKERS] float8 regression test failure in head

2006-04-20 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes: Don't we have some of these platforms on the build farm. Are they failing? canary, gazelle, and osprey all pass this test just fine. Before accepting any patches in this area we'd better find out the difference between the OP's netbsd system and

Re: [HACKERS] float8 regression test failure in head

2006-04-20 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes: Don't we have some of these platforms on the build farm. Are they failing? canary, gazelle, and osprey all pass this test just fine. Before accepting any patches in this area we'd better find out the difference between the

Re: [HACKERS] float8 regression test failure in head

2006-04-20 Thread Patrick Welche
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 11:56:29AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes: Don't we have some of these platforms on the build farm. Are they failing? canary, gazelle, and osprey all pass this test just fine. Before accepting any

Re: [HACKERS] float8 regression test failure in head

2006-04-20 Thread Tom Lane
Patrick Welche [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: canary, gazelle, and osprey all pass this test just fine. Before accepting any patches in this area we'd better find out the difference between the OP's netbsd system and those machines. Quoting from my original post NetBSD-3.99.17/i386 - so what are

Re: [HACKERS] float8 regression test failure in head

2006-04-05 Thread Patrick Welche
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 11:03:38PM -0500, Neil Conway wrote: Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: This has not yet been fixed... Attached is a patch for this issue. I've checked with Chris, and this patch allows the regression tests to pass on his machine. I also updated float8-exp-three-digits

Re: [HACKERS] float8 regression test failure in head

2004-03-22 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
This has not yet been fixed... Chris Tom Lane wrote: Christopher Kings-Lynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Attached are the test failures I'm currently getting. It looks like Neil didn't update expected/float8-small-is-zero.out for his recent changes (for which, shame on him). Would you get

Re: [HACKERS] float8 regression test failure in head

2004-03-22 Thread Neil Conway
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: This has not yet been fixed... Attached is a patch for this issue. I've checked with Chris, and this patch allows the regression tests to pass on his machine. I also updated float8-exp-three-digits expected file, but I wasn't able to test these changes (I don't

Re: [HACKERS] float8 regression test failure in head

2004-03-22 Thread Tom Lane
Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Attached is a patch for this issue. I've checked with Chris, and this patch allows the regression tests to pass on his machine. I also updated float8-exp-three-digits expected file, but I wasn't able to test these changes (I don't have access to a QNX

[HACKERS] float8 regression test failure in head

2004-03-17 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Attached are the test failures I'm currently getting. -bash-2.05b$ uname -a FreeBSD mir.internal 4.9-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 4.9-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Sep 22 14:46:18 WST 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MIR i386 Chris parallel group (13 tests): text name char varchar oid boolean int2

Re: [HACKERS] float8 regression test failure in head

2004-03-17 Thread Tom Lane
Christopher Kings-Lynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Attached are the test failures I'm currently getting. It looks like Neil didn't update expected/float8-small-is-zero.out for his recent changes (for which, shame on him). Would you get together to verify the correct regression outputs for your