Re: [HACKERS] psycopg2 license changed

2010-02-16 Thread Bruce Momjian
Federico Di Gregorio wrote: Even if tests and examples code aren't almost never distributed except in the psycopg2 source package? A couple of other people contributed to the tests: if you really feel like it is so important I'll contact them and ask their permission to use the LGPL3 +

Re: [HACKERS] psycopg2 license changed

2010-02-16 Thread Bruce Momjian
Greg Smith wrote: Federico Di Gregorio wrote: Even if tests and examples code aren't almost never distributed except in the psycopg2 source package? A couple of other people contributed to the tests: if you really feel like it is so important I'll contact them and ask their permission to

Re: [HACKERS] psycopg2 license changed

2010-02-15 Thread Gabriele Bartolini
Ciao Federico, Federico Di Gregorio ha scritto: I just wanted all interested people know that psycopg2 2.0.14 to be released in the next few days will be under the LGPL3 + OpenSSL exception (example code and tests under the LGPL3 alone because they are never linked to OpenSSL). Thank you so

Re: [HACKERS] psycopg2 license changed

2010-02-15 Thread Greg Smith
Federico Di Gregorio wrote: I just wanted all interested people know that psycopg2 2.0.14 to be released in the next few days will be under the LGPL3 + OpenSSL exception (example code and tests under the LGPL3 alone because they are never linked to OpenSSL). Great news and I look forward to

Re: [HACKERS] psycopg2 license changed

2010-02-15 Thread Federico Di Gregorio
On 15/02/2010 20:12, Greg Smith wrote: Federico Di Gregorio wrote: I just wanted all interested people know that psycopg2 2.0.14 to be released in the next few days will be under the LGPL3 + OpenSSL exception (example code and tests under the LGPL3 alone because they are never linked to

Re: [HACKERS] psycopg2 license changed

2010-02-15 Thread Greg Smith
Federico Di Gregorio wrote: Even if tests and examples code aren't almost never distributed except in the psycopg2 source package? A couple of other people contributed to the tests: if you really feel like it is so important I'll contact them and ask their permission to use the LGPL3 + exception

Re: [HACKERS] psycopg2 license changed

2010-02-14 Thread Josh Berkus
On 2/13/10 5:13 PM, Federico Di Gregorio wrote: Hi *, I just wanted all interested people know that psycopg2 2.0.14 to be released in the next few days will be under the LGPL3 + OpenSSL exception (example code and tests under the LGPL3 alone because they are never linked to OpenSSL).

Re: [HACKERS] psycopg2 license changed

2010-02-14 Thread Federico Di Gregorio
On 14/02/2010 18:33, Josh Berkus wrote: I just wanted all interested people know that psycopg2 2.0.14 to be released in the next few days will be under the LGPL3 + OpenSSL exception (example code and tests under the LGPL3 alone because they are never linked to OpenSSL). Yaaay! Of

Re: [HACKERS] psycopg2 license changed

2010-02-14 Thread Devrim GÜNDÜZ
On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 18:37 +0100, Federico Di Gregorio wrote: Of course, now I'm on the hook to fix bugs. Bugs? Which bugs? :) Come on, you know, some people report bugs sometimes ;) -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ, RHCE PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer devrim~gunduz.org,

[HACKERS] psycopg2 license changed

2010-02-13 Thread Federico Di Gregorio
Hi *, I just wanted all interested people know that psycopg2 2.0.14 to be released in the next few days will be under the LGPL3 + OpenSSL exception (example code and tests under the LGPL3 alone because they are never linked to OpenSSL). The Zope 2 and 3 adapters will be splitted out into their