Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-07-06 Thread Bruce Momjian
Bruce Momjian wrote: Andrew Dunstan wrote: There is also the tiny patch to trap lexical warnings I submitted not long ago still outstanding. OK, I missed that one. I see it at: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-06/msg00280.php I applied the attached patch from

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-07-06 Thread Bruce Momjian
Bruce Momjian wrote: Bruce Momjian wrote: Andrew Dunstan wrote: There is also the tiny patch to trap lexical warnings I submitted not long ago still outstanding. OK, I missed that one. I see it at: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-06/msg00280.php I

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-06-22 Thread Fabien COELHO
Dear Stephen, I'd really like to see role support added into 8.1. I'm also pretty interested in this, and was planing loosely to think about implementing roles someday. It is even better if it is done by someone else;-) I've sent Alvaro and Tom versions of the patch in the past and I

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-06-21 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian Sent: 21 June 2005 05:04 To: PostgreSQL-development Subject: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze We have addressed all the open issues for 8.1 except for auto-vacuum, which

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-06-21 Thread Magnus Hagander
We have addressed all the open issues for 8.1 except for auto-vacuum, which Alvaro is working on, so I think we are ready for a feature freeze on July 1. I don't beleive we have :-( The server instrumentation patch is not yet addressed. Last I checked there was the objections to

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-06-21 Thread Oleg Bartunov
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian Sent: 21 June 2005 05:04 To: PostgreSQL-development Subject: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze We have addressed all the open issues for 8.1 except for auto-vacuum, which Alvaro is

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-06-21 Thread Stephen Frost
* Bruce Momjian (pgman@candle.pha.pa.us) wrote: We have addressed all the open issues for 8.1 except for auto-vacuum, which Alvaro is working on, so I think we are ready for a feature freeze on July 1. Bruce, I'd really like to see role support added into 8.1. I've sent Alvaro and Tom

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-06-21 Thread Tom Lane
Stephen Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'd really like to see role support added into 8.1. I've sent Alvaro and Tom versions of the patch in the past and I was planning on submitting it to -patches soon. There's a few remaining issue but I don't think they'll take very long to clean

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-06-21 Thread Stephen Frost
* Tom Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Stephen Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'd really like to see role support added into 8.1. I've sent Alvaro and Tom versions of the patch in the past and I was planning on submitting it to -patches soon. There's a few remaining issue but I

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-06-21 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes: We have addressed all the open issues for 8.1 except for auto-vacuum, Aside from the other stuff people mentioned, I have these things on my to-look-at list: * Fix pg_dump to be able to dump large objects in text dumps * Fix inherited constraints

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-06-21 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Bruce Momjian wrote: We have addressed all the open issues for 8.1 except for auto-vacuum, which Alvaro is working on, so I think we are ready for a feature freeze on July 1. FYI - plperl status. I am trying to get the following 2 items done by feature freeze: . convert returned perl

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-06-21 Thread Victor Y. Yegorov
I'll do my best to submit bitmap index AM patch next week for your review. -- Victor Y. Yegorov ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-06-21 Thread Bruce Momjian
Andrew Dunstan wrote: There is also the tiny patch to trap lexical warnings I submitted not long ago still outstanding. OK, I missed that one. I see it at: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-06/msg00280.php However, I don't see the new regession files attached to that

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-06-21 Thread Bruce Momjian
Magnus Hagander wrote: Is there an Open Issues list yet, as you usually prepare for releases? If so, can you please put these items up on it? Yes, it is at: This item has been added to the 7.4 open items list: http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgopenitems It did contain only

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-06-21 Thread Michael Glaesemann
On Jun 21, 2005, at 1:03 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: We have addressed all the open issues for 8.1 except for auto-vacuum, which Alvaro is working on, so I think we are ready for a feature freeze on July 1. I'm hoping to add documentation and regression tests for interval- day over the

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-06-21 Thread Michael Glaesemann
On Jun 21, 2005, at 1:03 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: We have addressed all the open issues for 8.1 except for auto-vacuum, which Alvaro is working on, so I think we are ready for a feature freeze on July 1. I'm hoping to add documentation and regression tests for interval- day over the

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-06-21 Thread Josh Berkus
People: Oh, and in implementing the COPY stuff we realized that there weren't any regression tests for encodings. If we can figure out how to do them, we'll add those. Are new regression tests permitted during beta? -- --Josh Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-06-21 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, Josh Berkus wrote: People: Oh, and in implementing the COPY stuff we realized that there weren't any regression tests for encodings. If we can figure out how to do them, we'll add those. Are new regression tests permitted during beta? Yes, most definitely ...

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-06-21 Thread Tom Lane
Josh Berkus josh@agliodbs.com writes: Oh, and in implementing the COPY stuff we realized that there weren't any regression tests for encodings. If we can figure out how to do them, we'll add those. Are new regression tests permitted during beta? Certainly. Feature freeze is about

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-06-21 Thread Neil Conway
Bruce Momjian wrote: We have addressed all the open issues for 8.1 except for auto-vacuum, which Alvaro is working on, so I think we are ready for a feature freeze on July 1. It would be nice to upgrade to autoconf 2.59 before the freeze (although it would probably be okay to do this