except inherit.sql passed. The expected output
change is included in the patch.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EntepriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise Postgres Company
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/adt/ruleutils.c b/src/backend/utils/adt/ruleutils.c
index 9ad54c5..2e87183 100644
--- a/src/backend
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Chetan Suttraway
chetan.suttra...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
Hi,
After running regression, I ran EXPLAIN on one of the queries in
regression (test create_misc) and got
of situation was more common than the other,
but I'm not really sure why.
Maybe what we need to do instead is create totally-made-up, unique
aliases when something like this happens.
regards, tom lane
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EntepriseDB Corporation
qualify the fake
aliases in the generated query. See examples in first post.
regards, tom lane
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EntepriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise Postgres Company
:
Ashutosh Bapat ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com writes:
So, as I understand we have two problems here
1. Prefixing schemaname to the fake alises if there is another RTE with
same name. There may not be a relation with that name (fake alias name
given) in the schema chosen as prefix.
2. Fake
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Ashutosh Bapat ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com writes:
Looking at the code, it seems that the fake aliases (eref) for relations
(may be views as well) are not generated per say, but they do not get
changed when
(for
RTE_RELATION only) in ruleutils.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EntepriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise Postgres Company
.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EntepriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise Postgres Company
--
Sent via pgsql
?
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 09:00:25PM +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 23.01.2013 20:56, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 06:03:28PM +0530, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
anyway, +1 for making this as default option. Going
,
Ashutosh Bapat
EntepriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise Postgres Company
criteria
like they can not be composite type etc. exprType() throws error when it's
passed expressions which do not have type and hence I can not use it
directly. Is there a function, which would tell me whether a given
expression can have a type or not?
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EntepriseDB
in that case I punted and just made it print the source
expression(s).
So, there doesn't seem to be any serious reason behind the restriction.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EntepriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise Postgres Company
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Ashutosh Bapat ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com writes:
Consider following sequence of commands
create type complex as (r float8, i float8);
create type quad as (c1 complex, c2 complex);
create temp table quadtable(f1
, if the pointer to be copied is
NULL?
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EntepriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise Postgres Company
in
alter_table.sql).
PFA patch which drops these two tables from alter_table.sql and
corresponding OUT change. The regression run clean with this patch.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EntepriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise Postgres Company
diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/alter_table.out b/src
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
I noticed that the test alter_table.sql is creating two tables tab1 and
tab2
and it's not dropping it. Any test which follows
after
themselves, which is useful in some cases (testing the cleaning, for one
thing), but not useful for 2. and 3.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EntepriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise Postgres Company
, it looks like parameter values stored in EState are never
used.
Is this correct? Or somewhere we use those parameter values?
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EntepriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise Postgres Company
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On 02.08.2011 12:54, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
Hi All,
I am looking at usage of bound parameters.
In functions SPI_cursor_open_with_args() and SPI_cursor_open_with_args()
parameters are flagged
and needs a better shape. If community is
willing to accept the extension, I can work on it further.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EntepriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
gb_subquery_pk.patch
Description: Binary data
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Ashutosh Bapat ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com writes:
The reason being, it doesn't look into the subqueries (in FROM clause) to
infer that p.product_id is essentially product.product_id which is a
primary key.
Right
that we throw
functional dependency related errors at the time of creation of views?
regards, tom lane
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EntepriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Ashutosh Bapat ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com writes:
Is there any reason why do we want to check the functional dependencies
at
the time of parsing and not after rewrite? Obviously, by doing so, we
will
allow creation
historical reason?
Regards,
Vaibhav
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EntepriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise Postgres Company
aggregates. Sum
does not need all the aggregate infrastructure in place, for example
finalisation function. May be after removing initialization part you want to
run regression (or at least aggregates.sql) to see what it breaks.
Regards,
Vaibhav
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
Kaushal
vaibhavkaushal...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried all aggregates - min,max,sum,count and avg. all are working. What
do you suggest now?
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Vaibhav Kaushal
to VM, the build goes fine.
Is this a known issue? What's the cure?
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EntepriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.comwrote:
On 06/25/2013 01:14 PM, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
Hi,
I am observing a strange problem when I build latest PostgreSQL head on
Ubuntu 12.04. I am running Ubuntu 12.04 as VM on Mac 10.7. The build
directory points
.
Thoughts/Comments?
Regards,
Atri
Regards,
Atri
l'apprenant
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EntepriseDB Corporation
(pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EntepriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
-hackers
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EntepriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
of them
to pick up?
Objections, better ideas?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EntepriseDB
.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EntepriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
-restricted operations I am wondering what are other
restrictions on the queries whose results can be used to create
materialized views.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EntepriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
I would be good, if this set gets documented, lest users will be confused.
Can you point me to relevant sections of document? I can add this
documentation.
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 01:57:49PM +0530, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
I
mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
.val) q using(val);
This at least caused the outer reference to be added as parameter, but
again no lateral_relid.
Is there an example query (however impractial query it would be), which can
make the lateral_relids set in RelOptInfo of plain base relation?
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
of a table, then it's very likely
that relevant code is untested in PostgreSQL.
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Ashutosh Bapat ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com writes:
In order to test various cases of LATERAL join in Postgres-XC, I am
trying
to find a query where
/pgsql-hackers
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
when I create a table or an
index. I am printing just for testing purpose to get a feel of code.
Please tel me the procedure to run and print using printf().
--
Regards,
Rohit Goyal
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
,
depesz
--
The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact
with it.
http://depesz.com/
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
have a testcase which tests this code path as well.
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
No adding OFFSET there too didn't give the expected result. The lateral
was handled in subquery and passed as param to the underlying table scan.
I am
. Is there another way to get the Oid?
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
of the table.
Though this is simple for simple query given as example in your mail, the
process is tricky for complex queries.
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Masterprojekt Naumann1
mpws201...@gmail.com wrote:
2014/1/15 Ashutosh Bapat ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com
Hi Cathleen,
An aggregate
@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
*
/tmp/.s.PGSQL.5432 /tmp/.s.PGSQL.5432.lock
Looks like a bug in psql to me. Does anybody see that behaviour?
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
|
222
222string
.
.
skipped
And other info
amul@amul:~/work/postgresql$ psql postgres
I installed from HEAD(ae5266f25910d6e084692a7cdbd02b9e52800046)
I failed to reproduce it, do I missing something?
Regards,
Amul Sul
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB
of memory while collecting the
result set. Either the documentation or the behaviour should be modified.
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Pavan Deolasee pavan.deola...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
May be each setup
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Bernd Helmle maili...@oopsware.de wrote:
--On 20. Februar 2014 14:49:28 +0530 Ashutosh Bapat
ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
If I set some positive value for this variable, psql runs smoothly with
any size of data. But unset that variable
,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
buffer_usage_objects.sql
Description: Binary data
buffer_usage_queries.sql
Description: Binary data
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http
sufficiently large output is encountered (larger
than some predefined value MAX_ROWS or something), psql behaves as if
FETCH_COUNT is set to MAX_ROWS. Documenting this behaviour wouldn't be a
problem and would not be a problem, I guess.
--
Thanks
Bernd
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
just calling them at appropriate places.
Thanks,
--
NEC OSS Promotion Center / PG-Strom Project
KaiGai Kohei kai...@ak.jp.nec.com
-Original Message-
From: Ashutosh Bapat [mailto:ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 5:59 PM
To: Kohei KaiGai
Cc
,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
?
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
array_test.pgc
Description: Binary data
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
catalog pg_attribute for getting an oid
for a column also. How do we add a column into pg_attribute ?
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Boszormenyi Zoltan zbos...@pr.hu wrote:
2014-03-24 07:22 keltezéssel, Ashutosh Bapat írta:
Hi,
I tried using integer array within a structure array in ECPG code. But
it resulted in some garbage values being printed from the table. Here are
the details
not understand that the field is an
array of integers (or for that matter array of anything) and store all the
values in contiguous memory at the given address.
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Michael Meskes mes...@postgresql.orgwrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 11:52:30AM +0530, Ashutosh Bapat
,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
with offset = size of that member, thus again corrupting
memory, if there are more than one rows being saved through pointer.
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Michael Meskes mes...@postgresql.orgwrote:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 09:33:15AM +0530, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
So, you are saying that we should try
into such complex
structure.
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
Hi MIchael,
I tried to fix the offset problem. PFA the patch. It does solve the
problem of setting wrong offset in ECPGdo() call.
But then there is problem of interpreting the result from
allocations.
The patch is based on development head. Please consider this to be
backpatched to 9.3 as well.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
test_select.pgc
Description: Binary data
diff --git a/src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc/type.c b/src
at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael.meskes at gmail dot com
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
. While reading array of char pointer in ecpg_do_prologue(), use the
address instead of the value at that address
3. The pointer arithmetic should treat such variable as char **, instead of
char *
ECPG regression tests do not show any failures with this patch.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
Let me bring the bug fix again to the surface. Is anybody looking at this
fix?
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
Hi,
When array of char * is used as target for the FETCH statement returning
more than one row, it tries to store all
,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
of v11 up to the current master.
regards,
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
...@lab.ntt.co.jp
wrote:
(2014/06/24 16:30), Etsuro Fujita wrote:
(2014/06/23 18:35), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
Selecting tableoid on parent causes an error, ERROR: cannot extract
system attribute from virtual tuple. The foreign table has an OID which
can be reported as tableoid for the rows coming
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Etsuro Fujita fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp
wrote:
(2014/06/30 17:47), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
I checked that it's reporting the right tableoid now.
Thank you for the check.
BTW, why aren't you using the tlist passed to this function? I guess
to have attr_needed for child rels.
regards, tom lane
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Etsuro Fujita fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp
wrote:
(2014/06/30 20:17), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Etsuro Fujita
fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp mailto:fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
(2014/06/30 17:47), Ashutosh Bapat wrote
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Etsuro Fujita fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp
wrote:
(2014/07/01 15:13), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Etsuro Fujita
fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp mailto:fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
We may want to modify use_physical_tlist
in parsenodes.h
---
Only the newly added char *inp_str(that is different from ANALYZE) value
is NULL. I was able to retrieve the column name from va_cols.
Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
--
Regards,
Ashoke
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB
, corresponding _copy* is the
first suspect. You may be able find why it worked in command line and why
not through the connector by breaking on copyObject() in either cases.
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
You may have to add code to copy
and Merge join implicitly eliminate the non-joining children.
2. We need a way to push join down append path, which PostgreSQL doesn't do
today.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Ashutosh Bapat ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com writes:
Right now, constraint exclusion code looks only at the provided
conditions.
If we want avoid table scan based on constraints in the above example, it
will need to look
infrastructure we've been
talking about where Postgres would know what the partitioning key is
and the order and range of the partitions so it can directly generate
the matching subjoins in less than n^2 time.
--
greg
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Ashutosh Bapat ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com writes:
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I doubt it. The extra code isn't the problem so much, it's the extra
planning cycles spent trying
://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
and if
eof_reached is false.
2096 /* Must be EOF if we didn't get as many tuples as we asked
for. */
2097 fsstate-eof_reached = (numrows fetch_size);
2098
2099 PQclear(res);
2100 res = NULL;
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
ashutosh.ba
.
Is there any suggestions or opinions?
regards,
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
parallel costs
in plan/path structs, and single-row mode for postgres_fdw. I
hope it will go towards anything.
regards,
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
test, that feels a bit like the tail wagging the dog to me,
especially as I do hope that some day we'll figure out a way to use a
better compression algorithm than pglz.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database
[min_attr ..
max_attr] */
Thanks,
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Etsuro Fujita fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp
wrote:
Hi Ashutish,
(2014/08/14 22:30), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Etsuro Fujita
fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp mailto:fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
(2014/08/08 18:51), Etsuro
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Etsuro Fujita fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp
wrote:
(2014/08/21 13:21), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Etsuro Fujita
fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp mailto:fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
Hi Ashutish,
I am sorry that I mistook
to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1599
Thanks,
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Etsuro Fujita fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp
wrote:
Hi Ashutosh,
Thanks for the review!
(2014/11/13 15:23), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
I tried to apply fdw-inh-3.patch on the latest head from master branch.
It failed to apply using both patch and git apply
, it will good, if we add that to regression in postgres_fdw.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
Hi Fujita-san,
Here are my comments about the patch fscan_reltargetlist.patch
Sanity
Patch applies and compiles cleanly.
Regressions in test
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Etsuro Fujita fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp
wrote:
(2014/11/12 20:04), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
I reviewed fdw-chk-3 patch. Here are my comments
Thanks for the review!
Tests
---
1. The tests added in file_fdw module look good. We should add tests
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Etsuro Fujita fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp
wrote:
(2014/11/18 18:27), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Etsuro Fujita
fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp mailto:fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
(2014/11/17 19:36), Ashutosh Bapat wrote
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Etsuro Fujita fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp
wrote:
(2014/11/19 14:58), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Etsuro Fujita
fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp mailto:fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
(2014/11/18 18:27), Ashutosh Bapat wrote
Ok. I added that comment to the commitfest and changed the status to ready
for commiter.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Etsuro Fujita fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp
wrote:
(2014/11/19 15:56), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Etsuro Fujita
fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 2:46 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Etsuro Fujita fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp writes:
(2014/11/19 18:21), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
Ok. I added that comment to the commitfest and changed the status to
ready for commiter.
Many thanks!
I committed
1 - 100 of 965 matches
Mail list logo
