On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Robert Treat wrote:
On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 13:51, Josh Berkus wrote:
really the most important thing here is that we get some movement on the
site in order to ditch the old VM the site lives on and get it on our new
web VM.
On techdocs? What part of that
Justin,
From memory, the OpenOffice.org surveys still run from the techdocs
virtual machine too. That may or may not be the case these days, I just
don't remember.
Really? I thought that they were running from one of Sun's machines. Will
check with Cristian.
If we're hosting the
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:
Justin,
From memory, the OpenOffice.org surveys still run from the techdocs
virtual machine too. That may or may not be the case these days, I just
don't remember.
Really? I thought that they were running from one of Sun's machines. Will
In fact: http://oosurvey.gratismania.ro/stats
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:
Justin,
From memory, the OpenOffice.org surveys still run from the techdocs
virtual machine too. That may or may not be the case these days, I just
], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Datum: Friday, November 07, 2003 09:34 AM
Betreff: [pgsql-www] [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List
[...]
How can we help?
Andreas?
Regards, Dave.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once
emeritus is a perfectly good latin word. No need to
dumb things down.
--elein
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 05:26:29PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Josh Berkus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
B) What contributors are listed under Major Developers who haven't
contributed any code
-Original Message-
From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 November 2003 22:18
To: Robert Treat
Cc: Alvaro Herrera; Dave Page; Josh Berkus;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List
Let me ask you
Well the current argument aside, I do find it discouraging that there is
a considerable difference between the four sites, advocacy, gborg, dev,
and the main site, not only in form but in substance.
I am listed on the dev site as a major contributor, but not on the
advocacy site. Where was the
On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 06:32, Andreas Grabmüller wrote:
Hi all,
well, the most of the programming itself is done, what's currently missing is
1) Some fine tuning on the layout
2) Adding the static pages
3) Translating the pages, news, events etc. into german and maybe some other
Robert Treat writes:
I disagree... the tech and the content are separate issues, let's keep
them that way or we'll never make progress on either of them.
Just because one solution is technically more simple, it doesn't mean that
it is the overall best solution.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
I think we had agreed that formerly-listed contributors would not be
deleted, but would be moved to a new section titled Contributors
Emeritus or some such. Please make sure that Tom Lockhart and Vadim
get listed that way, at least.
I think the Emeritus
Robert,
on techdocs there is a todo.php file which is probably completely bogus.
theres some indecision on the direction of this site. I would like to
convert the whole thing to CVS, including the wiki pages that comprised the
guides section. others are testing using bricolage to make a new
Tom,
Peter appeared to be asking how additional people could get involved.
Or do you *want* to keep the web group too small to get things done?
Ooops! Sorry, Peter, I *completely* mis-read your e-mail.
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
---(end
-Original Message-
From: Josh Berkus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 November 2003 22:27
To: Bruce Momjian; Tom Lane
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List
Guys,
Oh, and how about we kill the Image Map
Emeritus is verbatin from Latin and is really very spread into most Western
languages.
--
Paulo Scardine
I think the Emeritus word might be too hard for non-native English
speakers, and even for less educated English speakers.
---(end of
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 03:21, Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 November 2003 23:11
To: Josh Berkus
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List
Josh Berkus
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 09:25:38AM -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
The advocacy site does have different requirements than the main site,
namely its bi-lingualness and the different target audience, but perhaps
with adding bi-lingual capabilities to the main site these two sites
could be brought
-Original Message-
From: Alvaro Herrera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 November 2003 14:47
To: Robert Treat
Cc: Dave Page; Peter Eisentraut; Josh Berkus;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List
On Thu, Nov 06
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 09:46, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 09:25:38AM -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
The advocacy site does have different requirements than the main site,
namely its bi-lingualness and the different target audience, but perhaps
with adding bi-lingual
Robert Treat writes:
rant
we don't need links, we need patches
/rant
Let me ask you the questions that people always ask of us:
How does one get involved?
Where is the code?
What is the plan?
Where is the roadmap?
Where can issues be discussed?
Who is working on this?
How can we help?
--
Peter,
Let me ask you the questions that people always ask of us:
This isn't helping. What Robert was pointing out is that we don't currently
have enough people writing HTML and PHP to finish improving the site anytime
soon. Robert doesn't need managerial direction.
Or did you have
Josh Berkus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Peter,
Let me ask you the questions that people always ask of us:
This isn't helping. What Robert was pointing out is that we don't
currently have enough people writing HTML and PHP to finish improving
the site anytime soon.
Peter appeared to be asking
On Thursday 06 November 2003 17:18, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Robert Treat writes:
rant
we don't need links, we need patches
/rant
Let me ask you the questions that people always ask of us:
How does one get involved?
post proposals to pgsql-www and start coding
Where is the code?
Tom Lane wrote:
Josh Berkus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
B) What contributors are listed under Major Developers who haven't
contributed any code since 7.1.0?
I think we had agreed that formerly-listed contributors would not be
deleted, but would be moved to a new section titled Contributors
Guys,
Oh, and how about we kill the Image Map of major developers? It's about 4
years out of date, and makes developers.postgresql.org load like molasses in
January.
--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
---(end of
Josh Berkus wrote:
Guys,
Oh, and how about we kill the Image Map of major developers? It's about 4
years out of date, and makes developers.postgresql.org load like molasses in
January.
Agreed. I think Jan is the only one who knows how to updated it. Jan?
--
Bruce Momjian
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Josh Berkus wrote:
Oh, and how about we kill the Image Map of major developers? It's about 4
years out of date, and makes developers.postgresql.org load like molasses in
January.
Agreed.
Yeah. It was cute when we did it but it's overkill as a way
Tom,
Yeah. It was cute when we did it but it's overkill as a way of pointing
out that we have a worldwide development community. We can just say
that...
I'll be happy to re-do it someday using OOo's imagemapper. But not this week
...
--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San
Josh Berkus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oh, and how about we kill the Image Map of major developers? It's about 4
years out of date, and makes developers.postgresql.org load like molasses in
January.
Personally, I don't really see the need for developer.postgresql.org
to be a separate
Neil Conway writes:
Personally, I don't really see the need for developer.postgresql.org
to be a separate sub-site. Since it is basically just a collection of
links to other resources (CVSweb, TODO list, devel docs build, etc.),
why not just make it a page or two on www.postgresql.org?
I
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Josh Berkus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
B) What contributors are listed under Major Developers who haven't
contributed any code since 7.1.0?
I think we had agreed that formerly-listed contributors would not be
deleted, but would be moved to a
I think we had agreed that formerly-listed contributors would not be
deleted, but would be moved to a new section titled Contributors
Emeritus or some such. Please make sure that Tom Lockhart and Vadim
get listed that way, at least.
I think the Emeritus word might be too hard for non-native
I think the Emeritus word might be too hard for non-native English
speakers, and even for less educated English speakers.
Isn't that an even better reason to use it? :)
My personal opinion would be that they can use dictionary.com if they
don't know what it means.
Chris
33 matches
Mail list logo
