Re: [SQL] Correct implementation of 1:n relationship with n0?

2013-04-30 Thread Vik Fearing
On 04/30/2013 04:39 PM, Wolfgang Keller wrote: It hit me today that a 1:n relationship can't be implemented just by a single foreign key constraint if n0. I must have been sleeping very deeply not to notice this. E.g. if there is a table list and another table list_item and the relationship

Re: [SQL] UNNEST result order vs Array data

2013-06-20 Thread Vik Fearing
On 06/20/2013 12:40 PM, gmb wrote: Hi all I just want to confirm something regarding UNNEST function used with arrays. I cannot see that it is specifically mentioned in the documentation , but maybe because it is obvious. Is the order of the result guaranteed to be the order of the array

Re: [SQL] UNNEST result order vs Array data

2013-06-20 Thread Vik Fearing
On 06/20/2013 01:00 PM, gmb wrote: Can you please give me an example of how the order is specified? I want the result of the UNNEST to be in the order of the array field E.g. SELECT UNNEST ( ARRAY[ 'abc' , 'ggh' , '12aa' , '444f' ] ); Should always return: unnest abc ggh

Re: [SQL] Unquoted column names fold to lower case

2013-07-03 Thread Vik Fearing
On 07/03/2013 11:12 AM, Dev Kumkar wrote: All unquoted identifiers are assumed by PostgreSQL to be lower case by default. This means - SELECT MY_COLUMN FROM my_table - SELECT my_column FROM my_table - SELECT my_column as MY_COLUMN FROM my_table All refer to my_column and has column name in

Re: [SQL] table constraint on two columns

2013-07-22 Thread Vik Fearing
On 07/22/2013 04:05 PM, ldrlj1 wrote: Postgres 9.2.4. I have two columns, approved and comments. Approved is a boolean with no default value and comments is a character varying (255) and nullable. I am trying to create a constraint that will not allow a row to be entered if approved is set