On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 12:19 AM, Keith Hodges [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do have a look at Sake/Packages equivalent to universes.
I agree with Keith. Sake/Packages have all the features of universes
without a GUI but provide an easy way to define your own universe as
you did with Seaside and as
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 08:10:53 +0200
Damien Cassou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 12:19 AM, Keith Hodges [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do have a look at Sake/Packages equivalent to universes.
Some told me they would stop using my
dev-images if I use Sake/Packages without giving
Hi Damien
I can give you an explanation but keith will not like it.
Note that I like the ideas that he is pushing and that I started to
write a chapter for the next book on installer.
- Keith idea that everybody can build its own distribution is not
something that everybody like
- For
Damien Cassou wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 12:19 AM, Keith Hodges [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do have a look at Sake/Packages equivalent to universes.
I agree with Keith. Sake/Packages have all the features of universes
without a GUI but provide an easy way to define your own universe as
you
Hello all,
Have a look at:
http://www.object-arts.com/content/news/excitingNews.html
Object Arts and Lesser Software are collaborating on a new version of
Dolphin. They are still sticking to the Windows-only angle, which I
find disappointing. However, even if they hold to that, we are
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 8:26 AM, Stéphane Ducasse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- For example I would like to have a real look at MC1.6 but the
message around it is blurry
MC1.6 is not the topic here.
I tried LFP and it broke on me.
It worked fine for me. You may want to try again and send bug
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Lukas Renggli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One problem I see with Sake/Packages is that these tools depend on a
lot of other packages, that I don't necessarily want to have loaded in
my images: Logging, Rio, Installer, Sake, Packages ...
I guess one could argue
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Janko Mivšek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you answered already: no GUI, no integration with tools. I see that
as the only obstacle to a broader acceptance of Keith's work.
For a long time, debian linux systems did not have any GUI to manage
their packages.
On Sep 26, 2008, at 5:03 PM, Damien Cassou wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 8:26 AM, Stéphane Ducasse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- For example I would like to have a real look at MC1.6 but the
message around it is blurry
MC1.6 is not the topic here.
Still this is the same :). It is a
Damien
can you post the code to load
Sake
Packages
MC1.6
For me I'm always lost.
Stef
___
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Hi all.
Gary and I decided we ought to give out an MCZ of our fixes that we've
put together over the last two years.
Obviously some of those we found have been pulled into Pharo already,
but the attached MCZ represents those that we think are still
relevant :)
This is a rough list of
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Lukas Renggli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One problem I see with Sake/Packages is that these tools depend on a
lot of other packages, that I don't necessarily want to
have loaded in
my images: Logging, Rio, Installer, Sake, Packages ...
I guess one
My objection, the big ball of mud called Kernel-Extensions and the
liberal
use of overrides, which I think are evil. I like using packages
that do
their best to only use extensions and don't just go around the
system willy
nilly monkey patching everything. I don't trust packages with
Hi
I'm tracking a problem I have and which is quite annoying
I cannot see the diff when I do a merge or browse with MC.
I'm with 10074 and I woudl like to know if you have the same behavior.
Stef
___
Pharo-project mailing list
Simon
with which machine did you create you mcz?
Because apparently I can see the diffs for other packages.
Can somebody else check the pinesoft package I put in the pharoInbox?
Stef
Hi all.
Gary and I decided we ought to give out an MCZ of our fixes that
we've put together over the
I'm trying to understand the problem
I have the hypothesis that this is linked with the class extension or
the fact that the package does not exist in the image.
Can you also check that you can see diff when the changes is in an
class extension?
Because this is strange with some packages I
hi Stef.
Hmm, strange. How are you viewing the diffs? If I browse the MCZ in a
Monticello browser I see extensions to these classes:
BrowserCommentTextMorph
BrowserRequestor
CanvasCharacterScanner
Character
ConnectionQueue
GrafPort
MultiCanvasCharacterScanner
NaturalLanguageTranslator
Random
On Sep 26, 2008, at 10:07 PM, Simon Kirk wrote:
hi Stef.
Hmm, strange. How are you viewing the diffs? If I browse the MCZ in
a Monticello browser I see extensions to these classes:
BrowserCommentTextMorph
BrowserRequestor
CanvasCharacterScanner
Character
ConnectionQueue
GrafPort
18 matches
Mail list logo
