On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Integrating Monticello commands directly into code browser, in
right-click menu over packages. This really helps with code management, I
know that from VW.
you should use the package browser and ask for improvement
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Bill Schwab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, as further evidence of the accumulated effort, to check the jargon
above, I just fired up an early 3.9 image that was handy, and the
differences are striking! Maybe I do want to lean on Damien for an
updated web image
Damien Cassou writes:
Polymorph is going to be included in all Pharo images so you don't
have to worry. RB as been in all my images from the beginning and will
continue to be. I think I will stop generating web images for Pharo
because we want only one image for Pharo. I will try to find a
Yann I guess
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
because there is a package Network YM 44
Please please avoid to use initials.
Stef
___
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
Marcus Denker writes:
On 24.09.2008, at 23:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For now, I just used the vm from the seaside package and copied all th
dll's in
from the freetype package. This seems to work...
The recompiling gets really more important as soon as we go for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marcus Denker writes:
On 24.09.2008, at 23:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For now, I just used the vm from the seaside package and copied all th
dll's in
from the freetype package. This seems to work...
The recompiling gets
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 12:36 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Damien Cassou writes:
Polymorph is going to be included in all Pharo images so you don't
have to worry. RB as been in all my images from the beginning and will
continue to be. I think I will stop generating web images for Pharo
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Bill Schwab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Damien,
Now I'm confused :) If installing Seaside is easy, then the web image
is not all that necessary, agreed. With PolyMorph in Pharo, every image
gets better. No worries so far.
You said we want one image for
Hi guys
I was browsing some etoy cleans of gary and I found somewhere sqPage
and SqueakPage.
Apparently we can save on disc a bookmorph.
Any ideas if this is working/useful/fun?
Stef
___
Pharo-project mailing list
Damien,
Sounds good.
Bill
Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D.
University of Florida
Department of Anesthesiology
PO Box 100254
Gainesville, FL 32610-0254
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: (352) 273-6785
FAX: (352) 392-7029
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/28/08 9:16 AM
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Bill Schwab
On 28.09.2008, at 15:27, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Hi guys
I was browsing some etoy cleans of gary and I found somewhere sqPage
and SqueakPage.
Apparently we can save on disc a bookmorph.
Any ideas if this is working/useful/fun?
I think this is partly not used anymore: now projects are
Sorry, I'll make sure I set my fullname in my new images.
Cheers,
Yann
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Damien Pollet [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Yann I guess
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
because there is a package Network YM 44
Please
Hi Yann
Yann you should
- sign the agreement
- then explain your commits because else we cannot really guess
and this is important that other people can follow and may be
contradict you.
Stef
On Sep 28, 2008, at 6:11 PM, Yann Monclair wrote:
Sorry, I'll make sure I set my
Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Hi Damien
I can give you an explanation but keith will not like it.
Note that I like the ideas that he is pushing and that I started to
write a chapter for the next book on installer.
- Keith idea that everybody can build its own distribution is not
something
I agree that Universes is not the ultimate solution, but at least it
seems to work reasonably well. I like the declarative way to
specifying package dependencies.
Cheers,
Lukas
Sake/Packages has been changed to be declarative for the most part,
though it isn't restricted to that.
100% agree. This is why I'm saying that we want to integrate extensions
or reject them.
If it doesn't meet those criteria, I don't consider it safe to even
experiment with.
However, if the base system doesnt support loading and unloading of
things in the first place, its a bit unfair to
In 10082 the script is buggy. script174 contains a line
with only
.mcz
and one line with an archive
Pinesoft-Removals-EToys-stephane.ducasse.1.mcz
that is not in the repository.
Norbert
___
Pharo-project mailing list
On 28.09.2008, at 19:01, Keith Hodges wrote:
Now, the code may work perfectly fine, and Keith's done a lot of
work, but
it's just not community friendly code. A package should have a clear
responsibility, few dependencies, not too many extensions, no
overrides if
at all possible, and
Thanks I will fix that.
This is strange since I tested it on my working Moose image.
Stef
On Sep 28, 2008, at 8:43 PM, Norbert Hartl wrote:
In 10082 the script is buggy. script174 contains a line
with only
.mcz
and one line with an archive
Pinesoft-Removals-EToys-stephane.ducasse.1.mcz
normally this is fixed.
I will try to reload it.
Stef
On Sep 28, 2008, at 8:43 PM, Norbert Hartl wrote:
In 10082 the script is buggy. script174 contains a line
with only
.mcz
and one line with an archive
Pinesoft-Removals-EToys-stephane.ducasse.1.mcz
that is not in the repository.
argh I have to check
sorry
Stef
On Sep 28, 2008, at 9:26 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Thanks I will fix that.
This is strange since I tested it on my working Moose image.
Stef
On Sep 28, 2008, at 8:43 PM, Norbert Hartl wrote:
In 10082 the script is buggy. script174 contains a line
with
But what did you get from the senders of Url#toText?
Because indeed Url#toText will be removed.
Ok I will check what you did and wait for your agreement :)
Stef
On Sep 28, 2008, at 9:09 PM, Yann Monclair wrote:
Hi list,
I figured I'd explain my commit here, since I don't know how you
On Sep 28, 2008, at 6:50 PM, Keith Hodges wrote:
Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Hi Damien
I can give you an explanation but keith will not like it.
Note that I like the ideas that he is pushing and that I started to
write a chapter for the next book on installer.
- Keith idea that everybody can
Now it is working for me.
Stef
___
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
You can always use the built in Enhancement tag.
Cheers,
Doru
On Sep 28, 2008, at 9:40 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
I would prefer a bugtraker with a tag todo that are not bug fixes.
Stef
___
Pharo-project mailing list
I replaced the only sender I found in the base Pharo image
(HttpUrl#askNamePassword).
I found a few senders in Universe, but I couldn't publish the changes, the
project is ReadOnly and I haven't time to chase up the admins about it yet.
I'll send my agreement next week.
Cheers,
Yann
On Sun,
considering that mantis now has 1000 open entries...
Marcus
??
The difference being, that we dont create a mantis entry so that it can
languish unused. We use mantis as a vessel for holding snippets of code
and collecting feedback.
Installer collects a list of fixes applied, and
On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 21:41 +0200, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Now it is working for me.
For me, too. Thanks!
Norbert
___
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Marcus Denker wrote:
On 28.09.2008, at 22:16, Keith Hodges wrote:
considering that mantis now has 1000 open entries...
Marcus
??
The difference being, that we dont create a mantis entry so that it can
languish unused. We use mantis as a vessel for holding snippets of code
and
29 matches
Mail list logo
