Issue 191: freeze in World/Configuration menu
Issue 134: ReadOnlyVariableBinding should be removed (unused experiment)
Issue 194: some random cleanups from 23.09
Issue 193: Squeakmap fails to open if it is purged and no sm/ dir
present
Issue 205: [ENH] 10% faster senders of
May be time to release? How do we proceed for the dev packages?
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Marcus Denker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Issue 191: freeze in World/Configuration menu
Issue 134: ReadOnlyVariableBinding should be removed (unused
experiment)
Issue 194: some random
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Marcus Denker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ssue 191: freeze in World/Configuration menu
Issue 134: ReadOnlyVariableBinding should be removed (unused
experiment)
Issue 194: some random cleanups from 23.09
Issue 193: Squeakmap fails to open if it
Hi Marcus,
good batch of changes!
I'm just trying to understand the process by which you made these,
since I was going to make some more that are dependent on it. I
didn't see a SLICE-xx for these changes in PharoInbox, just the later
version of the individual packages in Pharo. Is this
On 01.10.2008, at 10:37, Damien Cassou wrote:
May be time to release? How do we proceed for the dev packages?
not yet. in the changesets I added there of course was a conflict..
and some
more cleanup is needed (remove preferences not needed, and so on)
Marcus
On Wed, Oct 1,
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Marcus Denker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
May be time to release? How do we proceed for the dev packages?
not yet. in the changesets I added there of course was a conflict.. and some
more cleanup is needed (remove preferences not needed, and so on)
I may not
On 01.10.2008, at 10:42, Damien Cassou wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Marcus Denker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
ssue 191: freeze in World/Configuration menu
Issue 134: ReadOnlyVariableBinding should be removed (unused
experiment)
Issue 194: some random cleanups from
On 01.10.2008, at 11:03, Damien Cassou wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Marcus Denker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
May be time to release? How do we proceed for the dev packages?
not yet. in the changesets I added there of course was a conflict..
and some
more cleanup is needed
On Oct 1, 2008, at 11:03 , Damien Cassou wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Marcus Denker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
May be time to release? How do we proceed for the dev packages?
not yet. in the changesets I added there of course was a conflict..
and some
more cleanup is needed
I will confess to being in a similar situation. I have been grabbing
new images and looking at them, but am hoping to wait for the
integration before moving my code from my very old (in Pharo time)
image to a more recent one.
Bill
Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D.
University of Florida
Department of
On Oct 1, 2008, at 10:02 AM, Marcus Denker wrote:
Issue 191: freeze in World/Configuration menu
Issue 134: ReadOnlyVariableBinding should be removed (unused
experiment)
Issue 194: some random cleanups from 23.09
Issue 193: Squeakmap fails to open if it is purged and no sm/ dir
Hi Simon
Not entirely fair I know, but I'm using the demo TT + PolyMorph
image which was based on 10074. If I try to update from the server
on this image it throws up an emergency debugger, which is unsavable.
This may well be expected, given that the TT and PolyMorph
integration isn't a
Dear list,
In PharoInbox Gwenael and I put an extension of SUnit that records
results when running a set of test.
Feel free to suggest improvement
Open a TestRunner to enjoy its 'History' button.
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Alexandre Bergel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In PharoInbox Gwenael and I put an extension of SUnit that records results
when running a set of test.
Feel free to suggest improvement
Open a TestRunner to enjoy its 'History' button.
Please have a look at the
can you tell us more?
I cannot acces the wiki page.
I once tried to see the differences between SUnit and testing
but I could not really extract something.
Stef
On Oct 1, 2008, at 5:02 PM, Damien Cassou wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Alexandre Bergel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In
I would really like if Pharo will introduce a convention for tidying
up the image, proposed by Keith.
It could save a lot of time and nerves for developers/maintainers :)
http://www.nabble.com/Squeak-low-on-space...-td13243777.html#a13244357
--
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
Ok I saw it is below :)
I like the idea now it would be good to specify it a bit better.
Stef
I would really like if Pharo will introduce a convention for tidying
up the image, proposed by Keith.
It could save a lot of time and nerves for developers/maintainers :)
On 01.10.2008, at 11:15, Adrian Lienhard wrote:
On Oct 1, 2008, at 11:03 , Damien Cassou wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Marcus Denker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
May be time to release? How do we proceed for the dev packages?
not yet. in the changesets I added there of course was
Hi
I tried to load the following code into 10082 and 10083
in 10082 it works like a charm, in 10083
loadOB
self loadOB
| instClass |
instClass := self environment at: #Installer ifAbsent: [self new
installingInstaller].
instClass ss
project:
Why do your scripts use a temporary variable, this means that you cannot
select part of the script and Doit. This is one of the design goals of
Installer, that you be able to execute scripts either wholly or in parts.
You would be far better off referring to Installer directly or to 'self
Because we do not want to have a dandling reference if the package is
not loaded. :)
We want to be clean :)
Stef
On Oct 1, 2008, at 7:53 PM, Keith Hodges wrote:
Why do your scripts use a temporary variable, this means that you
cannot
select part of the script and Doit. This is one of the
On Oct 1, 2008, at 8:00 PM, Bill Schwab wrote:
Stef,
To reproduce, one would start with 10083 and invoke
Installer loadOB.
Is that correct?
We found the problem :)
some magic in bytecode generation that was broken.
It will be a couple of hours before I would have time
to try it, and
On 01.10.2008, at 20:18, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
On Oct 1, 2008, at 8:00 PM, Bill Schwab wrote:
Stef,
To reproduce, one would start with 10083 and invoke
Installer loadOB.
Is that correct?
We found the problem :)
some magic in bytecode generation that was broken.
Update 10084 fixes
On 01.10.2008, at 20:57, Marcus Denker wrote:
On 01.10.2008, at 20:18, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
On Oct 1, 2008, at 8:00 PM, Bill Schwab wrote:
Stef,
To reproduce, one would start with 10083 and invoke
Installer loadOB.
Is that correct?
We found the problem :)
some magic in bytecode
Please dont' update, it's broken right now.
(And I don't have time to fix it, I have to admit)
Marcus
--
Marcus Denker -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~denker
___
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
On 01.10.2008, at 10:53, Michael Roberts wrote:
Hi Marcus,
good batch of changes!
I'm just trying to understand the process by which you made these,
since I was going to make some more that are dependent on it. I
didn't see a SLICE-xx for these changes in PharoInbox, just the later
version
Bill Schwab writes:
Bryce,
Thanks for your reply. Actually, I mentioned FFI etc. because that
appeared to be a way to get what OSProcess wanted in terms of
dependencies; using Universes should handle that part for me.
FFI would be of interest on its own, but appears to make people
On 01.10.2008, at 11:27, Simon Kirk wrote:
Not entirely fair I know, but I'm using the demo TT + PolyMorph
image which was based on 10074. If I try to update from the server
on this image it throws up an emergency debugger, which is unsavable.
Yes, this will not work.
This may well be
Thanks marcus !
Stef
On Oct 1, 2008, at 9:15 PM, Marcus Denker wrote:
On 01.10.2008, at 21:04, Marcus Denker wrote:
Please dont' update, it's broken right now.
(And I don't have time to fix it, I have to admit)
Fixed. Make sure to update to 10084, this has the compiler bug fixed.
--
2008/10/1 Stéphane Ducasse [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ok I saw it is below :)
I like the idea now it would be good to specify it a bit better.
I think Keith can describe it more detailed. Keith?
As for me, a simple #cleanUp message added to Behavior is more than enough.
Then system utils can do a
Bryce,
It's every line of (eventually, if all goes well) several years worth
of work. YIKES!! :) Speaking of the mac, does Wikipedia have it
right? Did they change from CR to LF in OS-X? Do we plan a similar
move? Regardless, I should be able to drop extra control characters
either on the
I know about some of these. I'll leave my comments
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 10:53:25PM +0200, Damien Pollet wrote:
Hi list, we (with Stef) are browsing Kernel-Extensions, here are some
notes for discussion, as we think there is stuff that should be merged
in Pharo.
Most of the cleanup
Damien, Stef,
I would argue for #trimBlanks (very useful), #trimLineBreak (I do not recall
needing this one, but clearl you do, so go for it), and keeping
#withoutTrailing: as a separate entry point; write the others in terms of it.
IIRC, #trimBlanks probably should trim leading as well as
Adrian,
I ran the space tally, and have found, even after
WARegistry clearAllHandlers.
Smalltalk garbageCollect.
that there are still some Seaside entrails present in the image. In
particular, there are 11 instances of WAApplication, and 4 instances of
WADispatcher. There are
I started Smalltalk on an educational discount copy of V-DOS, and then
launched at a discounted copy of V-Win. The latter was particularly
prone to crashing during a save-and-exit. To this day, I save, and then
exit w/o saving. I can't get past it :) Humor aside, I would prefer to
have a way
#withoutTrailing:
is useful for things like, knocking the end off a url or path.
url withoutTrailing: $/
Keith
___
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
36 matches
Mail list logo
