Hi, Mariano
I also confronted this problem when I was writing some extension of
NewInspector. And I agree, the current process of registering of new
tools is ugly. I solved the problem with writing some code, which
created an anonymous class which merged behaviour of all the tool sets
passed to
Hi,
I think that introducing more global state is not a good idea.
I believe a cleaner solution would be to create have ToolSet default
return an instance of a ToolSetImplementation, and then create a
instance variables in the ToolSetImplementation for these tools and
let me customize it
I think that this would be the first mail to smalltalk-research
Begin forwarded message:
From: Tom Van Cutsem tvcut...@vub.ac.be
Date: February 3, 2010 5:13:00 AM GMT+01:00
To: SOFT members s...@soft.vub.ac.be
Cc: Stéphane Ducasse stephane.duca...@inria.fr
Subject: Communicating Event Loops
On 02.02.2010 23:06, John M McIntosh wrote:
Ok, I can speak from experience that the file clean up logic does work in
Squeak because in Sophie we would open 100's of files in a big project and we
did discover a bug in
the finalization logic that the FileStream uses to cleanup linkages after
Hi henrik
if you get a chance to have a look at the slice I uploaded it would be good.
I like the idea that people have a look at other code, which is what we do when
we integrate
now for my own code I always feel nervous :)
Stef
On Feb 3, 2010, at 9:40 AM, Henrik Sperre Johansen wrote:
On
Hi guys
I added the list of actions we performed in pharo 1.0
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/ActionsInPharoOne?ts=1265189477updated=ActionsInPharoOne
We should move on and make that list shinning a bit. Then use the trick of
miguel and get done
So mike can you have a look at the
this loads well in the latest 1,1 core :)
so now we should really have a look and these cool changes
Stef
On Jan 6, 2010, at 2:38 PM, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
SystemChangeNotifier uniqueInstance
noMoreNotificationsFor: TestCase.
Gofer it
disablePackageCache;
On 3 February 2010 10:33, Stéphane Ducasse stephane.duca...@inria.fr wrote:
I think that this would be the first mail to smalltalk-research
Err, what you mean?
All i could say, that this scheme already discussed on squeak-dev
couple of years ago... This is exactly the way where i think we
On Feb 3, 2010, at 12:34 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
On 3 February 2010 10:33, Stéphane Ducasse stephane.duca...@inria.fr wrote:
I think that this would be the first mail to smalltalk-research
Err, what you mean?
All i could say, that this scheme already discussed on squeak-dev
couple of
I'm ok for such a list...
Nevertheless, I'm wondering if we could go a bit further by doing a kind of
research group with a proper web site listing all people involved and the
projects there're working on. We could then establish some categories and
eventually sub-groups. List all published
Igor
You know Concurrent Smalltalk was certainly like that too.
Now my point is that this is good to share ideas that there are old or not.
Already discussed or not.
For example I would like to see the cost of it at the level of the GC.
Stef
Begin forwarded message:
From: Tom Van Cutsem
On Feb 3, 2010, at 1:18 PM, Cédrick Béler wrote:
I'm ok for such a list...
Nevertheless, I'm wondering if we could go a bit further by doing a kind of
research group with a proper web site listing all people involved and the
projects there're working on. We could then establish some
Cédrick: I like the idea, however, I think your idea may be a consequence
of my idea. You can do all steps at the same time, but I rather go step by
step. We first create the list, we create a group, we join people, we
discuss, we learn, and after that, eventually it will naturally arrive a
Here is a quick list of what I do or plan to do... Having a central web
site would be excellent for visibility (of course a mailing can be setup
too), both for Smalltalk and for people doing research with it.
for the moment having it low profile is also a good way.
What do you mean by
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Tudor Girba tudor.gi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I think that introducing more global state is not a good idea.
I believe a cleaner solution would be to create have ToolSet default
return an instance of a ToolSetImplementation, and then create a
instance
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Chris Muller asquea...@gmail.com wrote:
4) I have refactored DirectoryEntry to no longer inherit from
ArrayedCollection. Is this an improvement with any community
interest?
Do you think this is interesting ? What are the benefits of such change ?
Jannik:
On Feb 3, 2010, at 4:43 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Chris Muller asquea...@gmail.com wrote:
4) I have refactored DirectoryEntry to no longer inherit from
ArrayedCollection. Is this an improvement with any community
interest?
Do you think this
Extendability, correctness of semantics, and correctness of
implementation. Inheritance should adhere to an is-a relationship;
because it reflects a specialization of the superclass. A
DirectoryEntry is definitely not a Collection..
Regards,
Chris
2010/2/3 Mariano Martinez Peck
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Chris Muller asquea...@gmail.com wrote:
Extendability, correctness of semantics, and correctness of
implementation. Inheritance should adhere to an is-a relationship;
because it reflects a specialization of the superclass. A
DirectoryEntry is definitely not a
Marcus,
Rats :) You've stolen my thunder. Actually, I won't go as far as to say
never, but I agree. There are places in Squeak that inherit from collections
or put methods in Object, and it sure looks as though the programmer didn't
know any better. In fairness, it might have been intended
On Feb 3, 2010, at 5:03 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:
Marcus,
Rats :) You've stolen my thunder. Actually, I won't go as far as to say
never, but I agree. There are places in Squeak that inherit from
collections or put methods in Object, and it sure looks as though the
programmer
On 3 February 2010 18:12, Marcus Denker marcus.den...@inria.fr wrote:
On Feb 3, 2010, at 5:03 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:
Marcus,
Rats :) You've stolen my thunder. Actually, I won't go as far as to say
never, but I agree. There are places in Squeak that inherit from
collections or put
Igor
You know Concurrent Smalltalk was certainly like that too.
Now my point is that this is good to share ideas that there are old or not.
Already discussed or not.
Yes, that's why i asked , because i didn't understood your message.
So I repeat it.
Right now on my desktop when I open
On Feb 3, 2010, at 12:00 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
Hi folks. I found I big problem with the way ToolSet works or at least with
the way I think it works. Right now, there is the class ToolSet with certain
methods like API and then a class side method to register a XXX ToolSet as
Very true!
-Original Message-
From: pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr
[mailto:pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Marcus Denker
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 11:13 AM
To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project]
;-)
ok i have done some edits. You can look at the diffs in the source/svn
view (it took me a while to find that feature). Let me know what you
think. I have left some editorlal notes [ed: ] where I need some
clarification. Obviously it's just my 2p on things...
cheers,
Mike
2010/2/4 Michael Roberts m...@mjr104.co.uk:
;-)
ok i have done some edits. You can look at the diffs in the source/svn
view (it took me a while to find that feature). Let me know what you
Humm cool, i was not aware of this feature ;-)
--
Serge Stinckwich
UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi,
Thanks!
Indeed there were some work on UTF8Encoder and friends.
do you know if the same happened in latest squeak?
On Feb 3, 2010, at 10:57 PM, Yanni Chiu wrote:
When attempting to load Seaside-2.8, with the image updated to 11192, I got:
UndefinedObject(Object)doesNotUnderstand: #do:
I created a CRC calculating algorithm and I want to be able to deploy my
application for other people to use. I am not sure how to package an image
so that it is user friendly.
Any help would be nice.
Thanks
___
Pharo-project mailing list
2010/2/4 Nathan Tuttle nathan.tut...@gmail.com
I created a CRC calculating algorithm and I want to be able to deploy my
application for other people to use. I am not sure how to package an image
so that it is user friendly.
Hi Nathan! First of all, thanks for asking how to share something
Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Thanks!
Indeed there were some work on UTF8Encoder and friends.
do you know if the same happened in latest squeak?
I've not tried it on a recent Squeak.
On Feb 3, 2010, at 10:57 PM, Yanni Chiu wrote:
When attempting to load Seaside-2.8, with the image updated to
31 matches
Mail list logo
