On Jan 1, 2012, at 1:24 AM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi Stef,
We are in the new year now, so the arguments can begin :).
Sure ;)
First, these seem to be a totally different set of arguments :). That is good.
I do not like the magic of the block and arguments
There really is
Wishing all Pharoer's a very warm n happy new year
Since last few weeks, I have been experimenting with Pharo as a tablet
interface inside a tiny core Linux. The dev though happens on ubuntu. Some
more playing around for a group of trainees with pharo on windows 7, platform
I do not
What is that prevents picking lessons learnt, fixes from cuis into Pharo or
is it considered a totally different line altogether.
time or money.
But we are cleaning Pharo internals and in some place more than cuis, even if
Juan did a good job and we are looking at
his work. Now Juan
What I would like is that you take each of these points and send one mail for
each with a detailed description. so that we can answer, turn them into bug
entries..
I do intend doing this in a while thru the week ahead.
Thx,... For other answers...
On Jan 1, 2012, at 1:58 PM,
Excellent!
Stef
On Jan 1, 2012, at 10:36 AM, Krishsmalltalk wrote:
What I would like is that you take each of these points and send one mail
for each with a detailed description. so that we can answer, turn them into
bug entries..
I do intend doing this in a while thru the week
On 31.12.2011 18:58, Lukas Renggli wrote:
Let's take this on the Pharo mailing list.
I do think that Seaside should be considered for being part of the
Pharo infrastructure. At least the Core and the basic HTML rendering
(i.e., without JQuery, Magritte and Pier).
And I also think your analysis
So, before dismissing Seaside, perhaps it would be useful to actually
look into it.
rofl, made by day
Can we turn this into a meme?
Definitely, http://memegenerator.net/instance/12756821.
Lukas
--
Lukas Renggli
www.lukas-renggli.ch
. I find Pharo 1.2 more stable than 1.3 latest...
Me too. But it is not the core which is less stable in 1.3, but the dev
tools.
. Mechanism to autosave a defined package every method commit to a
packagename.mcz by default to ease crash recovery, use monticello only when
I need to
. I find Pharo 1.2 more stable than 1.3 latest...
Me too. But it is not the core which is less stable in 1.3, but the dev
tools.
Mariano, this is a logic puzzle for you:
http://memegenerator.net/instance/12757355
Lukas
--
Lukas Renggli
www.lukas-renggli.ch
Hi philippe
I need a dictionary to read your emails :)
What is a meme?
Stef
rofl, made by day
Can we turn this into a meme?
You look like you are having fun lukas. You made me laugh and I wish you a good
year.
This year I decided that I will more zen and not only related to pharo but to
life in general.
I have the best position I can dream of as researcher, so I will say no to a
lot of things and
I will have fun
On 01.01.2012 17:07, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Hi philippe
I need a dictionary to read your emails :)
What is a meme?
An idea virus [1]. You probably know several Internet memes [2] like
lolcats or Yo dawg.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meme
[2]
Ah ah! Excellent!!
Alexandre
Le 1 janv. 2012 à 11:55, Lukas Renggli reng...@gmail.com a écrit :
So, before dismissing Seaside, perhaps it would be useful to actually
look into it.
rofl, made by day
Can we turn this into a meme?
Definitely, http://memegenerator.net/instance/12756821.
There are a number of separate problems here, I think. Mixing them up
makes the situation a bit complex. I'll try separating them here.
At what abstraction level should the basic tools be build. From my point
of view, Glamour provides the right level. It is very easy to build browsers
and it is
Hi guys,
There is opportunity for someone of you to finally catch this bug! My
image is blocked again, but Aida is still working and my backdoor too :)
So, I can run any code on image. 'Sensor startUp' didn't help, what can
yet try? Last action was OSProcess related, can this be a problem, some
Hi,
I agree that people should load what they want on top of a nice little core.
But, most people will load exactly the same thing: one set of development tools
that should do the basic work nicely. This was the point of the Pharo
distribution. And it shipped with OB and it was great. Only OB
But, most people will load exactly the same thing: one set of development
tools that should do the basic work nicely. This was the point of the Pharo
distribution. And it shipped with OB and it was great.
OB was never part of PharoCore, it was part of a distribution
(PharoDev) that
Hi Lukas,
Please read my mails :). I was talking about Pharo distribution which in your
language means Pharo Dev. I never argued for Pharo Core. And I also said that
the whole misunderstanding stems from the position of the current Pharo image.
To me, the current image is a convenience for the
To you, the current Pharo image is the Pharo Core and you are unhappy that it
is too big (for example because RB is there).
The size is the least problem.
More annoying is that the code quickly gets out of sync and
non-changes are added to the history. Both of these problems are
already
Hi Stef,
On 1 Jan 2012, at 09:14, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
On Jan 1, 2012, at 1:24 AM, Tudor Girba wrote:
I do not like the magic of the block and arguments
There really is little magic. In fact, it is about the same as the magic of
Morphic calling selectors with arguments.
Hi,
On 1 Jan 2012, at 23:56, Lukas Renggli wrote:
To you, the current Pharo image is the Pharo Core and you are unhappy that
it is too big (for example because RB is there).
The size is the least problem.
More annoying is that the code quickly gets out of sync and
non-changes are added
Part of why those attacks are so easy is that the factor for the
multiplicative hash function is very poor (i.e.: 33, 31, etc). There is
nothing spectacular about this reasoning, those cool looking factors
chosen using the digital (finger) method should have been stamped out a
long time ago.
Hi guys,
There is opportunity for someone of you to finally catch this bug! My
image is blocked again, but Aida is still working and my backdoor too :)
So, I can run any code on image. 'Sensor startUp' didn't help, what can
yet try? Last action was OSProcess related, can this be a problem,
Hi,
I agree that people should load what they want on top of a nice little core.
But, most people will load exactly the same thing: one set of development
tools that should do the basic work nicely. This was the point of the Pharo
distribution. And it shipped with OB and it was great.
24 matches
Mail list logo
